On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Matt Harrison wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
| On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:32:33 +0100, Matt Harrison wrote:
| Sorry for replying to my own message, just had a thought. Could
| this all be a udev rules problem? I mean could some new rules in
| the updated udev package be
Greets,
I never used beagle so far, only recently read an article about it and
thought I would give it a try, so I emerged it yesterday.
So I have app-misc/beagle-0.2.18 now, with USE-flags eds gtk pdf python
thunderbird xscreensaver, along
mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.14 ...
Thanks for your help, but I'm still puzzled with the madwifi driver and the
build-in ath5k driver. Does it mean
if I choose to install a madwifi driver I can still use my 2.6.24 kernel?
But the problem is I cannot find the non-hamradio
WLAN option in current kernel either...
-邮件原件-
发件人:
Am Montag, 23. Juni 2008 schrieb ext Zhou Rui:
I'm using gentoo in my UMPC fujitsu U1010 which has a Atheros superG
wireless card. I found the wiki says there is a kernel option can
compile Atheros 5xxx WLAN driver into the kernel, but I cannot find it in
my kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r5 (emeged as
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Continuing to use cdrkit affords me that luxury of not getting involved,
so I can carry on blissfully not caring and instead devote my energies
to the projects I do care about.
Things are not as simple as you seem to believe.
You cannot stay off the
2008/6/24 Zhou Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks for your help, but I'm still puzzled with the madwifi driver and the
build-in ath5k driver. Does it mean
if I choose to install a madwifi driver I can still use my 2.6.24 kernel?
Though ath5k driver will eventually replace the madwifi driver
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Continuing to use cdrkit affords me that luxury of not getting
involved, so I can carry on blissfully not caring and instead
devote my energies to the projects I do care about.
Things are not as simple
On 23 Jun 2008, at 19:54, Joerg Schilling wrote:
...
The license of the original cdrtools has been examined by
specialized lawyers
and these lawyers did not see any license problem in the original
software.
A bit of Googling lead me to a couple of articles which appear to
indicate you
el 2008-06-23 a las 14:58 Joerg Schilling escribió:
Cdrecord is known to work with all drives and media. Other software
may have problems with some drives or media.
that's exactly my personal experience. i won't comment about license
issues, because although i always try to support free
Hi,
Let's say there's a new version of a given package. I'd like to make a
backup, update, test and if I liked the old version better restore.
What is (is there?) the Gentoo way to do that?
--
Best regards,
Daniel
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Daniel Iliev asks:
Let's say there's a new version of a given package. I'd like to make a
backup, update, test and if I liked the old version better restore.
What is (is there?) the Gentoo way to do that?
Let's assume you upgrade from package/foo-1.0 to package/foo-1.1. You can
then use
Ivan Alden ivan.alden at gmail.com writes:
I am trying to compile the ATI proprietary drivers for my DELL D600 lap.
I found in a web search that the last working drivers for this card was
the 8.28.8 version.
H,
I got this version installed and working:
Installed versions:
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jörg, you appear to be making a fundamental error of assumption. It
looks like you consider that simply because you think this matter
important (and in your life it probably IS important), that therefore
it must be important in mine. This is not true.
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:54:09 +0200
Alex Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Iliev asks:
Let's say there's a new version of a given package. I'd like to
make a backup, update, test and if I liked the old version better
restore.
What is (is there?) the Gentoo way to do that?
Thanks Alex, this is also useful to me. I'm fresh here.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Alex Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Iliev asks:
Let's say there's a new version of a given package. I'd like to make a
backup, update, test and if I liked the old version better restore.
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:41:12 +0100
Matt Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Some of you may remember my problems with lvm after an update in
http://www.archivum.info/gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org/2008-04/msg00899.html
I'm now headed back towards the same situation. I have a load
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:32:57 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
quickpkg is exactly what I was looking for.
You can also add buildpkg to FEATURES, then portage will create a binary
package for every package you install. It can use a fair amount of disk
space, but it means you can always roll back from
Neil Bothwick writes:
You can also add buildpkg to FEATURES, then portage will create a binary
package for every package you install. It can use a fair amount of disk
space, but it means you can always roll back from a broken version, even
if you managed to break portage.
And there's also
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:39:12 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
treat Virtual Machines # emerge -at gnucash
These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:23:45 +0100
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:32:57 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
quickpkg is exactly what I was looking for.
You can also add buildpkg to FEATURES, then portage will create a
binary package for every package you install. It
Hi,
yesterday I tried emerging pdftk and was instructed by the emerge output
to add 'gcj' to my USE flags. I did that, reemerged gcc and was able to
emerge pdftk just fine.
Now, whenever I do revdep-rebuild, gcc gets reemerged. Does anybody have
a better idea, than to change my USE flags and
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:47:56 -0400, Peter Wood wrote:
Now, whenever I do revdep-rebuild, gcc gets reemerged. Does anybody
have a better idea, than to change my USE flags and reemerge gcc
without the 'gcj' flag set?
This is a long-standing bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:56:29PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
This is a long-standing bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728
Long long Long LONG standing bug.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman rocket
Joerg Schilling ha scritto:
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jörg, you appear to be making a fundamental error of assumption. It
looks like you consider that simply because you think this matter
important (and in your life it probably IS important), that therefore
it must be important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thanks to all who replied to my previous question. This question is related.
Has anyone gotten the 'extra-ciphers' (you can get them from the loop-aes site)
to compile with the loop-aes kernel patch in place? If so, could you give me a
hint on
25 matches
Mail list logo
