On Samstag, 16. August 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've a strange problem with my root partion:
# du -hxs /
188M/
and
# du -hx --max-dep=1 /
24M /root
4.0K/cdrom
19M /etc
76K /.nvclock
12K /media
100K/chroot
4.0K/home
4.0K/usr
1.9M
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16.08.08 07:51]:
Hi,
I've a strange problem with my root partion:
the difference between du and df is about 640 - 188 = 452 MB. and df is
showing that my root is full 2.4 times more than du.
which one is the correct one? I've another server
Sebastian Günther wrote:
df shows you the available space on the fs and du the size of the files
inside it.
The difference is caused by the journal and the 5% reserved for the
superuser, which du does not take in account
Do others have this kind of inconsistancy on their systems?
I
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16.08.08 10:08]:
I've another question. On my server root is 80% full and last weed it was 98%
full. if it get to 100% , How can I delete or flush Journals to free some
space?
That is what the 5% are for, as you saw there where stated as not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sebastian Günther wrote:
df shows you the available space on the fs and du the size of the files
inside it.
The difference is caused by the journal and the 5% reserved for the
superuser, which du does not take in account
Do others have this kind of
Sebastian Günther wrote:
That is what the 5% are for, as you saw there where stated as not
available but they are for the superuser for such things.
So there is no way to free some space from journals.
BTW: Why is your root so full, or didn't you partionate your disk?
I did not partitioned
Platoali wrote:
Sebastian Günther wrote:
That is what the 5% are for, as you saw there where stated as not
available but they are for the superuser for such things.
So there is no way to free some space from journals.
BTW: Why is your root so full, or didn't you partionate your
Hi All,
Is there a way to convert a .mov file to be playable by a dvd player?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday 16 August 2008, Dale wrote:
Sebastian may have more and better ideas but if a reboot gave you
some space back, then you should check the tmp directories that are
usually cleared when rebooting. I notice that in your list /tmp
takes up 3.8Gb which is a good bit. May want to see
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 07:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the difference between du and df is about 640 - 188 = 452 MB. and df is
showing that my root is full 2.4 times more than du.
which one is the correct one? I've another server that this difference is
about 7 GiG and on that server
* Platoali ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16.08.08 11:14]:
Sebastian Günther wrote:
That is what the 5% are for, as you saw there where stated as not
available but they are for the superuser for such things.
So there is no way to free some space from journals.
BTW: Why is your root so full, or
Mick schrieb:
Hi All,
Is there a way to convert a .mov file to be playable by a dvd player?
Maybe this will help:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-117709.html
and
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Create_a_DVD:Encode
kh
Ward Poelmans wrote:
You can find those files with lsof | grep deleted. Try closing the
process with deleted files and suddenly your du en df will give the
same free diskspace.
Ofcourse, a reboot does also the trick.
lsof | grep -i deleted
...
/dev/console (deleted)
mysqld 5679
Sebastian Günther wrote:
OK here is a diference to big to be normal between df and du.
14GB against 5.5GB
We are definetly missing something...
Yes, that is the strange thing.
Last week, I was alarmed that / root is 98 percent full. but I could not
find any reason why server is
On Saturday 16 August 2008, KH wrote:
Mick schrieb:
Is there a way to convert a .mov file to be playable by a dvd player?
Maybe this will help:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-117709.html
and
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Create_a_DVD:Encode
Thanks KH. That's what I was familiar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alle giovedì 14 agosto 2008, Daniel Pielmeier ha scritto:
Rev. Ferris schrieb am 14.08.2008 19:26:
#cat /etc/locale.gen
it_IT UTF-8
de_DE ISO-8859-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15
de_DE UTF-8
it_IT ISO-8859-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Platoali ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16.08.08 13:13]:
Sebastian Günther wrote:
OK here is a diference to big to be normal between df and du.
14GB against 5.5GB
We are definetly missing something...
Yes, that is the strange thing.
This should definetly be investigated. This could be
On Friday 15 August 2008 15:41:04 Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
On Freitag, 15. August 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Oddly enough, 3D is very very snappy. It's the 2D
stuff that cripples the
performance, and on a desktop, 2D is exactly what
you want.
AFAIK the problem is that the 8XXX series
On Saturday 16 August 2008 03:57:42 b.n. wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann ha scritto:
In short: all 8XXX chips are bad. Because of the
thermal environment
laptops are on a different place of the bell curve
than desktops. Laptops
with nvidia graphic are failing left and right. Whole
series of
On Samstag, 16. August 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 15 August 2008 15:41:04 Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
On Freitag, 15. August 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Oddly enough, 3D is very very snappy. It's the 2D
stuff that cripples the
performance, and on a desktop, 2D is exactly
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:38:31 +0100, Mick wrote:
Is there a way to convert a .mov file to be playable by a dvd player?
media-video/tovid
--
Neil Bothwick
MIPS: Meaningless Indication of Processor Speed
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
loader/module.o: In function `MODULE_GetProcAddress':
module.c:(.text+0x109): undefined reference to `wrapper_target'
module.c:(.text+0x10e): undefined reference to `wrapper'
module.c:(.text+0x114): undefined reference to `report_entry'
module.c:(.text+0x11e): undefined reference to `report_ret'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I notice a net problem with the new KDE version.
If I use konqueror as browser I failed each first connection trial on
all website. After timeout, I must just press reload and it cnnect with
the website.
With Kmail if I use manual email download
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
I don't use compiz ;)
and people have reported slowdowns even with kde3.5.9 - with 4.1 it is just
much severe. And when I say 'severe' I talk about lagging for several seconds
between 'key pressed' and 'sign appears on screen'. Or 'mouse button pressed'
and
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Ward Poelmans wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 07:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the difference between du and df is about 640 - 188 = 452 MB.
and df is showing that my root is full 2.4 times more than du.
which one is the correct one? I've another server that this
On Saturday 16 August 2008 23:40:21 Dale wrote:
I use 3.5.9 and with a newer kernel, I get the same
slowdowns. Could
this me something to do with the kernel? I'm using
2.6.23 but the
2.6.25 kernel does this slow thing. It started in
2.6.24 range.
what video card do you have?
--
alan
On Sunday 17 August 2008 01:18:21 Paul Colquhoun wrote:
Actually, there is one more way to hide a file from du
If there is a file in the /var directory *BEFORE* the
/var partition is
mounted onto the directory, then du won't find it, but
df will know
about the space it is using.
You will
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 16 August 2008 23:40:21 Dale wrote:
I use 3.5.9 and with a newer kernel, I get the same
slowdowns. Could
this me something to do with the kernel? I'm using
2.6.23 but the
2.6.25 kernel does this slow thing. It started in
2.6.24
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 08:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 15 August 2008 14:36:58 Dale wrote:
Somewhat still on the same subject since I am still cleaning. Anyway to
clean out unneeded files in /etc? I'm thinking about files that
On 19:56 Sat 16 Aug, Dale wrote:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 08:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 15 August 2008 14:36:58 Dale wrote:
Somewhat still on the same subject since I am still cleaning. Anyway
to
clean out unneeded files in
forgottenwizard wrote:
On 19:56 Sat 16 Aug, Dale wrote:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 08:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 15 August 2008 14:36:58 Dale wrote:
Somewhat still on the same subject since I am
On 20:21 Sat 16 Aug, Dale wrote:
forgottenwizard wrote:
On 19:56 Sat 16 Aug, Dale wrote:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 08:38 -0500, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 15 August 2008 14:36:58 Dale wrote:
Somewhat
On Sonntag, 17. August 2008, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 16 August 2008 23:40:21 Dale wrote:
I use 3.5.9 and with a newer kernel, I get the same
slowdowns. Could
this me something to do with the kernel? I'm using
2.6.23 but the
2.6.25 kernel does this slow
Dale schrieb am 17.08.2008 05:06:
Dale wrote:
Will report back later. Dale
:-) :-)
OK. I ran it but not real sure what the output is. Text file
attached. Looks like a error or two and not sure if that matters or not.
Info:
portage-utils-0.1.29
portage-2.2_rc8
Thanks
Dale
:-)
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag, 17. August 2008, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 16 August 2008 23:40:21 Dale wrote:
I use 3.5.9 and with a newer kernel, I get the same
slowdowns. Could
this me something to do with the kernel? I'm using
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Try the attached file, putting the script directly into the mail
probably broke it!
Regards,
Daniel
OK. Did that. No errors. It is a HUGE list of files. Here is a SMALL
snippet:
/etc/make.conf
/etc/wvdial.conf
/etc/default/foldingathome
/etc/prelink.cache
Dale schrieb am 17.08.2008 05:35:
OK. Did that. No errors. It is a HUGE list of files. Here is a
SMALL
snippet:
snipping the snippet :-)
They all look about the same as those listed above. What would it look
like if one was orphaned?
Dale
:-) :-)
Detecting real orphan files is
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Dale schrieb am 17.08.2008 05:35:
OK. Did that. No errors. It is a HUGE list of files. Here is a
SMALL
snippet:
snipping the snippet :-)
They all look about the same as those listed above. What would it
look like if one was orphaned?
Dale
:-) :-)
38 matches
Mail list logo
