On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 00:06, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 19/11/2010, at 8:45pm, Fatih Tümen wrote:
I just want to beware of anything unusual instantly, preferably by
email. This is a single or two user laptop.
I've been meaning for some time to look for something like
On Saturday 20 November 2010 05:31:15 Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2010-11-20, Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Friday 19 November 2010 17:53:31 Grant Edwards wrote:
What different behavior?
As I said, from the command line ls shows the year for any file
more than 12
hi:
I upgraded rxvt-unicode within just one or two days, right after a
upgrade to version 9.09,
it does not support transparency any more, but my Xresources had been always
working for me.
post a snippet of my config file here, thanks.
URxvt.transparent:true
URxvt.shading:20
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 00:10:02 +0100, Mick wrote about Re: [gentoo-user]
migrating disks (from mounts to disklabels:
On Friday 19 November 2010 19:19:34 David W Noon wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:00:04 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] migrating disks (from mounts to
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:58:01PM +0800, fei huang wrote:
I upgraded rxvt-unicode within just one or two days, right after a
upgrade to version 9.09,
it does not support transparency any more, but my Xresources had been always
working for me.
post a snippet of my config file here,
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 00:32:28 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
But harmless. The severe delays you noticed were the result of a
broken modem/router failing to recognise that IPv6 was not available
and trying to use it anyway. The usual fix for such a problem is a
firmware update.
It's more
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 13:26:03 +, David W Noon wrote:
Unless you have the mother of all initrd's or initramfs's, you cannot
have /boot on a logical partition -- only a primary partition, as BIOS
interrupts will only access raw drives and primary partitions.
% fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk
On Saturday 20 November 2010 00:22:49 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:21 on Saturday 20 November 2010, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:13:50 +, Mick wrote:
Short of measuring the latency with some system (which I wouldn't know
how) I
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Willie Wong ww...@math.princeton.eduwrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:58:01PM +0800, fei huang wrote:
I upgraded rxvt-unicode within just one or two days, right after a
upgrade to version 9.09,
it does not support transparency any more, but my
ok, everything is back to normal again, I downgraded my rxvt-unicode to
9.07-r2 and it worked as before. shall I report a bug or maybe I still
missed something?
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:11 AM, fei huang daniel.huang...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Willie Wong
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 16:10:02 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] migrating disks (from mounts to disklabels:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 13:26:03 +, David W Noon wrote:
Unless you have the mother of all initrd's or initramfs's, you cannot
have /boot on a logical partition -- only a
On 11/20/10, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
Really? Please don't tell this computer, it's been booting from a logical
partition for more than six years.
GRUB user, meet a LILO user? :)
--
Arttu V.
On Saturday 20 November 2010 13:26:03 David W Noon wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 00:10:02 +0100, Mick wrote about Re: [gentoo-user]
Short of measuring the latency with some system (which I wouldn't know
how) I have experimented with setting the /boot partition on primary
and logical partitions
On 11/19/2010 03:46 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Been using e17 for years :-)
But you use kde too, right? How do you choose which one to use today?
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:36:01AM +0800, fei huang wrote:
ok, everything is back to normal again, I downgraded my rxvt-unicode to
9.07-r2 and it worked as before. shall I report a bug or maybe I still
missed something?
Go ahead and file a bug, but as pseudotransparency was never
officially
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:04:10AM -0800, Keith Dart wrote:
I had previously used method 3, with an entry in my ~/.Xdefaults for
it, that worked fine. It stopped for some reason with this new version.
I suspect they may have removed the hacks they talked about and now
depend on a properly
On 11/19/2010 11:46 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:03 on Friday 19 November 2010, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
Perhaps distros will pick up on this and offer other criteria, maybe
something like a profile selectable at boot-time or maybe even runtime.
What
Am 19.11.2010 16:36, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:18 on Friday 19 November 2010, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
On 11/19/2010 04:37 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
2.6.38 should contain a ~200 line patch that makes a huge difference to
desktop responsiveness under
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:59 on Saturday 20 November 2010, Mick did
opine thusly:
On Saturday 20 November 2010 00:22:49 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:21 on Saturday 20 November 2010, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:13:50 +,
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:25 on Saturday 20 November 2010, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
About two months ago I did reboot into a gentoo kernel and things did
feel a little different but not in a way I could put my fingers on. I
put it down to running a huge compile in
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:12 on Saturday 20 November 2010, walt did
opine thusly:
On 11/19/2010 03:46 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Been using e17 for years :-)
But you use kde too, right? How do you choose which one to use today?
Until about a year ago I primarily used e17 but also
On 11/20/2010 10:55 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:25 on Saturday 20 November 2010, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
About two months ago I did reboot into a gentoo kernel and things did
feel a little different but not in a way I could put my fingers on. I
put
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:09 on Saturday 20 November 2010, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
I'm running 2.6.36-ck-r2 and mplayer is smooth as a baby's backside - KDE
animations have no effect on that.
2.6.36-ck-r2 has BFS as scheduler. I thought your were not using BFS :-P
On 07/22/2010 03:14 PM, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:56:50 +0200 Andrea Momesso
momesso.and...@gmail.com wrote:
That's impossible, isn't it?
Swithcing profile and reemerging everithing isn't gonna work? Even from a
chroot?
Should I reinstall a new stage from scratch?
=== On Sat, 11/20, Willie Wong wrote: ===
If that were indeed the case (that they are forcing migration away
from pseudotransparency and into real transparency), then it'd have
been nice if the +/-tr tags throw some error text rather than just
being silently ignored.
===
I did some
Hi, i'm doing a backup of a windows installation using rsync.
Everything is working fine except for symlinks, the problem is that
symlinks are taking absolute path so they're going to be broken as
soon a paths get changed. look at the example:
$ ls -la /mnt/rsync/vista/
wxrwxrwx 1 root root
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 16:53:25 +, David W Noon wrote:
Really? Please don't tell this computer, it's been booting from a
logical partition for more than six years.
You must have a newer BIOS than I have on my 2004-vintage box, offering
non-standard BIOS facilities. The ISA-standard BIOS
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 00:54:36 +0100, Pau Peris wrote:
Hi, i'm doing a backup of a windows installation using rsync.
Everything is working fine except for symlinks, the problem is that
symlinks are taking absolute path so they're going to be broken as
soon a paths get changed.
walt wrote:
I've copy/pasted below a new post to the devicekit-devel mail list. I
can't
vouch for the accuracy of any of it, but it did catch my attention:
===
There seems to be a lack of information in a central place about
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Keith Dart ke...@dartworks.biz wrote:
=== On Sat, 11/20, Willie Wong wrote: ===
If that were indeed the case (that they are forcing migration away
from pseudotransparency and into real transparency), then it'd have
been nice if the +/-tr tags throw some
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:11 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Thursday 11 November 2010 18:07:35 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:05 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
If the
31 matches
Mail list logo
