On Wednesday 15 December 2010 19:24:22 Pau Peris wrote:
> n=`wc -l /var/lib/portage/world|awk '{ print $1 }'`;
> for i in `seq 1 $n`;do
> pkg=`cat /var/lib/portage/world|head -n$i|tail -n1`;
> echo -e "Packages depending on $pkg." >> /tmp/auditWorldFile.log
> equery d $pkg
On Monday 20 December 2010 23:42:17 Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Frank,
> > A few months back I switched to Debian (due to hardware problems) and
> > came back a few weeks ago. But ever since I came back, my terminus font
> > in KDE’s Konsole looks different and I don’t know why. It seems I have
> >
On 12/18/2010 07:15 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 18 December 2010 10:18:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> I've found there's just too much overhead with distcc, plus much of
>> the work is still done locally.
>
> I expected that but I wanted to try it to see.
>
>> I have a couple of Atom b
I'm looking for a Boxing-Day gift for myself. The local Walmart shows
an interesting 17" Acer laptop at...
http://www.walmart.ca/Electronics/Computers/Laptops/17quot-Laptops/Acer-Aspire-AS7551-3029-173-Notebook
Reading the specs, it does not seem to be cutting corners, low price
notwithstandi
Hi Frank,
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Hi list
>
> A few months back I switched to Debian (due to hardware problems) and came
> back a few weeks ago. But ever since I came back, my terminus font in
> KDE’s Konsole looks different and I don’t know why. It seems I have
> installed a different varia
Hi,
just to let you know that approach below works for me.
I modified it slightly in that I add
mount --bind /usr/portage /mnt/other/usr/portage
to belows cmd list as machine A and B will always be synchronized.
Thanks a lot,
Thomas
Am 15.12.2010 10:56, schrieb YoYo Siska:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2
101220 Frank Steinmetzger asked us to see the attached screenshot.
I much prefer what you have to what you had:
the latter looks badly squished, the former nice & open.
I use Fixed Misc (13), but everyone to his taste (smile).
--
,,
Hi list
A few months back I switched to Debian (due to hardware problems) and came
back a few weeks ago. But ever since I came back, my terminus font in KDE’s
Konsole looks different and I don’t know why. It seems I have installed a
different variant (it has more space between letters and the g
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Andy Wilkinson wrote:
> So, the only issue that I consistently have in Gentoo anymore is that there
> exist periods of time (probably coincident with gphoto2 or gvfs upgrades)
> wherein I can't automount my PTP digital camera (a Nikon D60, if it's
> relevant) and
walt wrote:
On 12/19/2010 05:28 PM, Dale wrote:
I want fireball to get a fixed IP from the router and I want smoker
> to get a fixed IP from the router. I think I know how to do that much.
When I first set up my TrendNet router I worried about that, too. After
spending many hours doing exactl
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Stroller
wrote:
>
> On 17/12/2010, at 10:56pm, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> ... an Atom N270 box ... server, but it's a bit slow compared with the other
>> boxes on the
>> network. A big bit, actually - 69 minutes to compile a kernel compared
>> with less than 9 minut
On 12/20/2010 10:04 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit
>>>
Something seems wrong.
Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to
remove it.
> Installed vers
On 12/19/2010 05:28 PM, Dale wrote:
I want fireball to get a fixed IP from the router and I want smoker
> to get a fixed IP from the router. I think I know how to do that much.
When I first set up my TrendNet router I worried about that, too. After
spending many hours doing exactly what you're
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Vincent-Xavier JUMEL writes:
Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit
Something seems wrong.
Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to
remove it.
Have you look
On Monday 20 December 2010 15:55:40 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> Vincent-Xavier JUMEL writes:
> > Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit
> >
> >> Something seems wrong.
> >> Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
> >> Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depcl
Vincent-Xavier JUMEL writes:
> Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit
>> Something seems wrong.
>> Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
>> Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to
>> remove it.
>>
> Have you look on how X.org packages are
On 12/19/2010 09:25 PM, Andy Wilkinson wrote:
To make matters worse, when gvfs/nautilus doesn't see the camera at all,
> I have no idea at all how to find out what messages might have been sent
> where, or why gvfs might not be seeing it...
I use gnome, but have no camera so I can't give speci
Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit
> Something seems wrong.
> Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
> Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to
> remove it.
>
Have you look on how X.org packages are built on your computer. You should buil
Something seems wrong.
Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to
remove it.
I can easily add hal to world, but should xdm depend on it?
allan
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Monday 20 December 2010 13:24:11 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 20 December 2010 12:04:27 J. Roeleveld wrote:
For the sake of the archives, I do need to correct you here.
With the current IP-numbers (IPv4) it's a 32-bit number, expressed as
four 8- bit numbers
On Monday 20 December 2010 13:24:11 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 20 December 2010 12:04:27 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > For the sake of the archives, I do need to correct you here.
> > With the current IP-numbers (IPv4) it's a 32-bit number, expressed as
> > four 8- bit numbers (A byte is 8 bit)
>
On Monday 20 December 2010 12:04:27 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> For the sake of the archives, I do need to correct you here.
> With the current IP-numbers (IPv4) it's a 32-bit number, expressed as
> four 8- bit numbers (A byte is 8 bit)
Of course. Thanks for the correction. I should just have stuck wit
On Monday 20 December 2010 11:44:11 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> (What follows has grown rather long. I hope it doesn't come over too
> much as a lecture.)
>
> It's fairly straightforward once you get the hang of it. The address of
> a device is a 64-bit number, expressed as four 16-bit numbers joined
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 20 December 2010 09:37:48 Dale wrote:
I set it up like this. The modem uses DHCP to get the IP from AT&T.
My local IP from the modem is 192.168.1.2. Then the router has the
IP 192.168.2.1 for my connection to the puter. The IP of my puter
is 192.168.2.5.
On Monday 20 December 2010 09:37:48 Dale wrote:
> I set it up like this. The modem uses DHCP to get the IP from AT&T.
> My local IP from the modem is 192.168.1.2. Then the router has the
> IP 192.168.2.1 for my connection to the puter. The IP of my puter
> is 192.168.2.5. The next puter will
2010/12/17 Sebastian Beßler :
> Am 17.12.2010 15:16, schrieb Pau Peris:
>>
>> No one knows what could be?
>
> Maybe you should ask on a kde4, xorg or chromium specific mailinglist or
> forum. A window without titlebar in the way as chromium uses it is a nasty
> hack and absolutly not supported from
Stroller wrote:
Sounds like you're getting it.
A computer (this includes routers) cannot have two interfaces on the same
subnet. They can have multiple network interfaces, as long as they're all on
different subnets. A router is a computer with multiple network interfaces,
acting to gateway d
On 19/12/2010, at 8:35pm, Dale wrote:
> ...
> O. Light bulb moment here, I think. The modem has a network, even tho
> it only has one device connected to it. The router has its own network but
> can have 4 devices connected to it. So, if the modem has 192.168.1.1 >255
> then the router
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Sunday 19 December 2010 21:35:57 Dale wrote:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Sunday 19 December 2010 13:17:51 Dale wrote:
I found a how to. I read it. This is what I got out of it. It
sounds like I need to let the modem use DHCP with the phone company.
On Sunday 19 December 2010 21:35:57 Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Sunday 19 December 2010 13:17:51 Dale wrote:
> >> I found a how to. I read it. This is what I got out of it. It
> >> sounds like I need to let the modem use DHCP with the phone company.
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> >> The
30 matches
Mail list logo
