On Friday 08 April 2011 00:39:07 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> So why can't links find the site?
Because I had a bad alias lurking in the undergrowth.
Sorry about the noise.
--
Rgds
Peter
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 07 April 2011 23:47:22 Dale wrote:
I mistyped a package name the other day and portage actually made
suggestions as to what I meant to type. O_O I think the devs are
trying to program in some ESP code. lol
No mate, they've just finally cottoned-on
On Friday 08 April 2011 00:09:29 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Friday 08 April 2011 00:55:19 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > Why do boxes on my network return this?
> >
> > $ nslookup www.gentoo.org
> > Server: 127.0.0.1
> > Address:127.0.0.1#53
> >
> > Non-authoritativ
On Friday 08 April 2011 00:55:19 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Why do boxes on my network return this?
>
> $ nslookup www.gentoo.org
> Server: 127.0.0.1
> Address:127.0.0.1#53
>
> Non-authoritative answer:
> www.gentoo.org canonical name = www-bytemark.gentoo.org.
> Na
On Thursday 07 April 2011 23:47:22 Dale wrote:
> I mistyped a package name the other day and portage actually made
> suggestions as to what I meant to type. O_O I think the devs are
> trying to program in some ESP code. lol
No mate, they've just finally cottoned-on to your and my bad typing!
Hello list,
Why do boxes on my network return this?
$ nslookup www.gentoo.org
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address:127.0.0.1#53
Non-authoritative answer:
www.gentoo.org canonical name = www-bytemark.gentoo.org.
Name: www-bytemark.gentoo.org
Address: 89.16.167.134
(This is on the dnsmasq
>
> > >
> > > Thanks, I've installed this and it seems to work.
> > >
> > >> learn to search portage. either "eix" or "emerge -s"
> > >
> > > That I'll have to do. I'm not fully comfortable with emerge yet.
> > >
> > >> Jeremy
> >
> > Sounds like you are new. Interesting commands: The "q" family
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 07 April 2011 21:10:32 Mark Knecht wrote:
mark@c2stable ~ $ equery files telnet-bsd | grep bin
Which of course he can't do until after he's installed the package.
--
Rgds
Peter
Damn
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 07 April 2011 21:10:32 Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> mark@c2stable ~ $ equery files telnet-bsd | grep bin
>
> Which of course he can't do until after he's installed the package.
>
> --
> Rgds
> Peter
Damn. You're right. My bad.
Well,
On Thursday 07 April 2011 21:10:32 Mark Knecht wrote:
> mark@c2stable ~ $ equery files telnet-bsd | grep bin
Which of course he can't do until after he's installed the package.
--
Rgds
Peter
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday 07 April 2011 15:14:43 Dale wrote:
>> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> > Hi, Jeremy.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:05:41AM -0500, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
>> >> [I] net-misc/netkit-telnetd
>> >>
>> >> Available versions: 0.1
On Thursday 07 April 2011 15:14:43 Dale wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Jeremy.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:05:41AM -0500, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
> >> [I] net-misc/netkit-telnetd
> >>
> >> Available versions: 0.17-r6 0.17-r8 ~0.17-r9 ~0.17-r10
> >> Installed versions:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Jeremy.
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:05:41AM -0500, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
[I] net-misc/netkit-telnetd
Available versions: 0.17-r6 0.17-r8 ~0.17-r9 ~0.17-r10
Installed versions: 0.17-r8(04:51:44 11/19/09)
Homepage:ftp://ftp.uk.linux.o
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Jeremy.
>
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:05:41AM -0500, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
>> [I] net-misc/netkit-telnetd
>> Available versions: 0.17-r6 0.17-r8 ~0.17-r9 ~0.17-r10
>> Installed versions: 0.17-r8(04:51:44 11/19/09)
>> H
Hi, Jeremy.
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:05:41AM -0500, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
> [I] net-misc/netkit-telnetd
> Available versions: 0.17-r6 0.17-r8 ~0.17-r9 ~0.17-r10
> Installed versions: 0.17-r8(04:51:44 11/19/09)
> Homepage:ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/Networking/
On Thursday 07 April 2011 11:35:42 BRM wrote:
> - Original Message
>
> > From: J. Roeleveld
>
> I think the issue comes from the fact that LVM2 supports Mirroring without
> an underlying RAID controller:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3woh2d7
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_Volume_Manag
On Thursday 07 April 2011 17:19:24 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo!
>
> I would like a telnet client installed on my gentoo amd64 system. When I
> try
> emerge telnet
> , I get told that telnet doesn't exist.
>
> What am I doing wrong? Is there a telnet client on gentoo?
As others s
- Original Message
> From: J. Roeleveld
> On Thu, April 7, 2011 7:31 pm, BRM wrote:
> > The attraction to LVM for me was that from what I could tell it supported
> > and
> > implemented a software-RAID
> > so that I could help protect from disk-failure. I never got around to
> > confi
On Thursday 07 April 2011 14:21:33 Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> Dale, this comment isn't meant as an insult. I honestly think you would be
> perfect for some QA or Testing job :)
QA != Testing
QA is the features of a company organisation that give it the characteristic of
not introducing faults.
On Thursday 07 April 2011 11:13:18 Dale wrote:
> Either the mirrors you are trying don't have it yet for some reason or
> it *could* be a bug and it is looking in the wrong place or something.
I have three mirrors in make.conf, but when those were exhausted, portage tried
106 others around the w
On Wednesday 06 April 2011 12:14:14 Gregory Fontenele wrote:
> want to leave this list but I can not, can someone erase me from this list?
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 00:37, Bill Longman wrote:
> > Maybe switch it to just a shift key?
> >
> > And I really *do* like the idea of language switch, Kf
On Thu, April 7, 2011 7:31 pm, BRM wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Joost Roeleveld
>> On Thursday 07 April 2011 06:52:26 BRM wrote:
>> > - Original Message
>> >
>> > > From: Joost Roeleveld
>> > >
>> > > On Thursday 07 April 2011 06:20:55 BRM wrote:
>> > > > - Origi
> I think that package is there, but I'll check this weekend. I didn't feel
like carrying my laptop today.
> It would be nice if I just had to install it, but I would think
revdep-rebuild should pull it in . . . or doesn't revdep-rebuild work that
way?
revdep-rebuild will only rebuild the package
- Original Message
> From: Joost Roeleveld
> On Thursday 07 April 2011 06:52:26 BRM wrote:
> > - Original Message
> >
> > > From: Joost Roeleveld
> > >
> > > On Thursday 07 April 2011 06:20:55 BRM wrote:
> > > > - Original Message
> > > >
> > > > > From: Neil Bo
- Original Message -From: walt Date: Thursday, April 7, 2011 12:32
pmSubject: [gentoo-user] Re: revdep-rebuild Not Fixing Broken LinksTo:
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> On 04/05/2011 07:23 AM, dhk...@optonline.net
wrote:> > On my amd64 laptop I have broken links that never clear up. > The
On 04/05/2011 07:23 AM, dhk...@optonline.net wrote:
On my amd64 laptop I have broken links that never clear up. The laptop is new
and the install is only about two months old. Everything works all right, but
revdep-rebuild lists the following broken links, and after a few weeks of
sync'ing the
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> Hi, Gentoo!
>>
>> I would like a telnet client installed on my gentoo amd64 system. When I
>> try
>> emerge telnet
>> , I get told that telnet doesn't exist.
>>
>> What am I doin
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo!
>
> I would like a telnet client installed on my gentoo amd64 system. When I
> try
> emerge telnet
> , I get told that telnet doesn't exist.
>
> What am I doing wrong? Is there a telnet client on gentoo?
>
> --
> Alan Mac
[I] net-misc/netkit-telnetd
Available versions: 0.17-r6 0.17-r8 ~0.17-r9 ~0.17-r10
Installed versions: 0.17-r8(04:51:44 11/19/09)
Homepage:ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/Networking/netkit/
Description: Standard Linux telnet client and server
learn to sea
Hi, Gentoo!
I would like a telnet client installed on my gentoo amd64 system. When I
try
emerge telnet
, I get told that telnet doesn't exist.
What am I doing wrong? Is there a telnet client on gentoo?
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
Dale gmail.com> writes:
> If you know how to do that, then that works. Right now, I have no
> experience with LVM. All I know is what I have read which is about as
> clear as mud.
Yes, I agree with you Dale.
The docs on LVM raid and many related issues are
in poor shape, confusing and miss
On Thursday 07 April 2011 09:11:35 Dale wrote:
> Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 April 2011 15:41:00 Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> >> On Thursday 07 April 2011 14:31:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:21:33 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> I think Dale will probably succe
On Thursday 07 April 2011 08:57:40 Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:21:33 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> >> I think Dale will probably succeed in breaking it :)
> >>
> >> Dale, this comment isn't meant as an insult. I honestly think you
> >> would
> >> be perfect for
On Thursday 07 April 2011 06:52:26 BRM wrote:
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Joost Roeleveld
> >
> > On Thursday 07 April 2011 06:20:55 BRM wrote:
> > > - Original Message
> > >
> > > > From: Neil Bothwick
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:22:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 07 April 2011 15:41:00 Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 07 April 2011 14:31:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:21:33 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
I think Dale will probably succeed in breaking it :)
Dale, this comment isn't m
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:21:33 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
I think Dale will probably succeed in breaking it :)
Dale, this comment isn't meant as an insult. I honestly think you would
be perfect for some QA or Testing job :)
But not on any project you wanted to
- Original Message
> From: Joost Roeleveld
> On Thursday 07 April 2011 06:20:55 BRM wrote:
> > - Original Message
> > > From: Neil Bothwick
> > > On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:22:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > > > I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my
> >
On Thursday 07 April 2011 15:41:00 Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday 07 April 2011 14:31:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:21:33 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > > I think Dale will probably succeed in breaking it :)
> > >
> > > Dale, this comment isn't meant as an insult. I h
On Thursday 07 April 2011 14:31:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:21:33 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > I think Dale will probably succeed in breaking it :)
> >
> > Dale, this comment isn't meant as an insult. I honestly think you would
> > be perfect for some QA or Testing job :)
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:21:33 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> I think Dale will probably succeed in breaking it :)
>
> Dale, this comment isn't meant as an insult. I honestly think you would
> be perfect for some QA or Testing job :)
But not on any project you wanted to finish on time ;-)
--
N
On Thursday 07 April 2011 06:20:55 BRM wrote:
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Neil Bothwick
> >
> > On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:22:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > > I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my
> > > OS
> > > on. Just my personal opinion on LVM.
> >
> >
On Thursday 07 April 2011 14:04:05 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 07:49:55 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > > Bear in mind that LVM has been around for years. It is proven and
> > > reliable. Once setup, you don't have to touch it, so you can't break
> > > it. The least trustworthy part of your s
- Original Message
> From: Neil Bothwick
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:22:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my OS
> > on. Just my personal opinion on LVM.
> This doesn't make sense. Your OS can be reinstalled in an hour or two,
> y
On Thursday 07 April 2011 18:39:12 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:31, Mick wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 April 2011 05:44:17 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > > Someone really should mention 'screen' in the handbook; that
> > > venerable
> > > tool just saved my day :)
> > >
> > > I was in the
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 19:58, Dale wrote:
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>> Gosh, now I feel stupid and illiterate ;_;
>>
>> Rgds,
>> --
>> Pandu E Poluan
>> ~ IT Optimizer ~
>> Visit my Blog: http://pepoluan.posterous.com
>>
>>
>>
>
> Welcome to my world. ROFLMAO
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
>
Of course,
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 07:49:55 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > Bear in mind that LVM has been around for years. It is proven and
> > reliable. Once setup, you don't have to touch it, so you can't break
> > it. The least trustworthy part of your system remains the user.
> Since I have no experience with LVM,
On Thursday 07 April 2011 07:49:55 Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:28:40 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put
> my
> OS on. Just my personal opinion on LVM.
> >>>
> >>> This doesn't make sense. Your OS c
Pandu Poluan wrote:
Gosh, now I feel stupid and illiterate ;_;
Rgds,
--
Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
Visit my Blog: http://pepoluan.posterous.com
Welcome to my world. ROFLMAO
Dale
:-) :-)
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:28:40 -0500, Dale wrote:
I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my
OS on. Just my personal opinion on LVM.
This doesn't make sense. Your OS can be reinstalled in an hour or two,
your photos etc. are irreplace
Gregory Shearman wrote:
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:22:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my OS
on. Just my personal opinion on LVM.
This doesn't make sense. Yo
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
>
> On Thursday 07 April 2011 05:44:17 Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> Someone really should mention 'screen' in the handbook; that venerable
>> tool just saved my day :)
>> I was in the midst of 'emerge --update --newuse world' over SSH when
>> my office had a 'temporary po
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:22:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my OS
>>> on. Just my personal opinion on LVM.
>>>
>> This doesn't make sense. Your OS can be reinstalled
On Thursday 07 April 2011 06:12:40 Dale wrote:
> Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 April 2011 05:22:41 Dale wrote:
> > You will need to do it in the following steps though:
> > - create PV, LVM and LV on the new drive
> > - copy data over
> > - create PV on old drive and add it to LVM
> > C
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:28:40 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my
> >> OS on. Just my personal opinion on LVM.
> >>
> > This doesn't make sense. Your OS can be reinstalled in an hour or two,
> > your photos etc. are irreplaceable.
> >
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:31, Mick wrote:
>
> On Thursday 07 April 2011 05:44:17 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > Someone really should mention 'screen' in the handbook; that venerable
> > tool just saved my day :)
> >
> > I was in the midst of 'emerge --update --newuse world' over SSH when
> > my office h
Dale writes:
> Quick question about LVM. I have a 750Gb drive that has miscellaneous
> stuff on it. Stuff likes videos, music, pictures, ISO files and a few
> other things. It's not full yet but it is working on it. I have my OS
> on sda. The large drive is on sdc. If I buy another drive it
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:22:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my OS
on. Just my personal opinion on LVM.
This doesn't make sense. Your OS can be reinstalled in an hour or two,
your photos etc. are irreplaceable.
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:22:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my OS
> on. Just my personal opinion on LVM.
This doesn't make sense. Your OS can be reinstalled in an hour or two,
your photos etc. are irreplaceable.
--
Neil Bothwick
Advance
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 07 April 2011 05:22:41 Dale wrote:
Hi,
Quick question about LVM. I have a 750Gb drive that has miscellaneous
stuff on it. Stuff likes videos, music, pictures, ISO files and a few
other things. It's not full yet but it is working on it. I have my OS
on
On Thursday 07 April 2011 05:22:41 Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quick question about LVM. I have a 750Gb drive that has miscellaneous
> stuff on it. Stuff likes videos, music, pictures, ISO files and a few
> other things. It's not full yet but it is working on it. I have my OS
> on sda. The large dr
Hi,
Quick question about LVM. I have a 750Gb drive that has miscellaneous
stuff on it. Stuff likes videos, music, pictures, ISO files and a few
other things. It's not full yet but it is working on it. I have my OS
on sda. The large drive is on sdc. If I buy another drive it should be
sd
Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello list,
What's happened to =net-libs/gnutls-2.10.5? One of my boxes wants to upgrade to
this version (from 2.10.4) but it's nowhere to be seen. This is the third day,
too, so it isn't just a brief asynchrony between servers.
Either the mirrors you are trying don'
Hello list,
What's happened to =net-libs/gnutls-2.10.5? One of my boxes wants to upgrade to
this version (from 2.10.4) but it's nowhere to be seen. This is the third day,
too, so it isn't just a brief asynchrony between servers.
--
Rgds
Peter
63 matches
Mail list logo
