Am 10.02.2013 06:11, schrieb Grant:
I received the following ELOG message after an emerge:
* One or more symlinks to directories have been preserved in order to
* ensure that files installed via these symlinks remain accessible. This
* indicates that the mentioned symlink(s) may be
Am 2013-02-10 00:26, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
li...@xunil.at wrote:
Next episode:
I also migrated my gentoo thinkpad to systemd today.
Cool.
;-) ... next try, I had systemd on both of my work-systems already a
year ago or so
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:25:25 -0600, Dale wrote:
Of course I have backups, although a quick run of demerge got it back
for me. But rolling back KDE, with the attendant hassles of messed up
configs, only sidesteps the bug , which relates to qr-core not KDE.
I didn't have any config problems
Am 2013-02-10 11:09, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Into fstab, right? I will try to play with automount-options as well.
nofail gives me a straight bootup as the system does not (try to)
enable swap. The cryptsetup-unit gets set up correctly:
# cryptsetup status swap
/dev/mapper/swap is
On Feb 10, 2013 3:29 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 06:11, schrieb Grant:
I received the following ELOG message after an emerge:
* One or more symlinks to directories have been preserved in order to
* ensure that files installed via these symlinks remain
Am 09.02.2013 20:58, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
On 09/02/2013 20:22, Florian Philipp wrote:
Hi list!
I have an issue with SSH. It's a variation of the old Set 'UseDNS no'
to avoid delays with faulty DNS records theme.
Following setup:
1. I have a server with IPv6 compiled into the SSH daemon
Dan Johansson dan.johans...@dmj.nu wrote:
On 02/10/13 06:19, Grant wrote:
I'm getting the following when restarting shorewall:
# /etc/init.d/shorewall restart
* Stopping firewall ...
* Starting firewall ...
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.
How can I find out
On Sunday 10 Feb 2013, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:25:25 -0600, Dale wrote:
Of course I have backups, although a quick run of demerge got it back
for me. But rolling back KDE, with the attendant hassles of messed up
configs, only sidesteps the bug , which relates to
On 10/02/2013 13:49, Michael Mol wrote:
On Feb 10, 2013 3:29 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 06:11, schrieb Grant:
I received the following ELOG message after an emerge:
* One or more symlinks to directories have been preserved in order to
* ensure that
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/02/2013 13:49, Michael Mol wrote:
On Feb 10, 2013 3:29 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 06:11, schrieb Grant:
I received the following ELOG message after an emerge:
* One or
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 06:49:59 -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
If my understanding of the situation is correct, we see this message
whenever a package is updated that in the old version installed to
/var/run and now has migrated to /run.
Even if I'm wrong, there is nothing to be done. /var/run
On 10/02/2013 15:14, Michael Mol wrote:
Better to leave the
symlink in place and train your eyes to ignore the elogs (something we
humans are extremely good at)
Oh god no...Then you end up like some folks who get bit every time
something changes (despite being warned about it for a months
Am 10.02.2013 14:14, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 10/02/2013 13:49, Michael Mol wrote:
On Feb 10, 2013 3:29 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 06:11, schrieb Grant:
I received the following
Am 2013-02-10 11:35, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I can live with that so far ... but it would be interesting to get that
right, just to learn things.
Maybe I should try the other approach and create a unit-file for the
encrypted swap by myself.
Next steps done ... no real success so far.
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 10/02/2013 13:49, Michael Mol wrote:
On Feb 10, 2013 3:29 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 06:11, schrieb Grant:
I received the
Alan McKinnon wrote:
It's probably better to leave the symlink in place for now. What
happens when the user installs a package they have never had before
and that package uses /var/run? It will make a directory which isn't
what you want. Better to leave the symlink in place and train your
On 10/02/2013 17:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I had to actually prevent the migration to /run by changing the
boot.misc script because if I do not do that, a number of subdirectories
which I had created in /var/run were not in /run and a number of apps
would not start properly and indeed
On 10/02/2013 17:53, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
It's probably better to leave the symlink in place for now. What
happens when the user installs a package they have never had before
and that package uses /var/run? It will make a directory which isn't
what you want. Better to leave the
Robin Atwood wrote:
On Sunday 10 Feb 2013, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:25:25 -0600, Dale wrote:
Of course I have backups, although a quick run of demerge got it back
for me. But rolling back KDE, with the attendant hassles of messed up
configs, only sidesteps the bug , which
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 10/02/2013 17:53, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
It's probably better to leave the symlink in place for now. What
happens when the user installs a package they have never had before
and that package uses /var/run? It will make a directory which isn't
what you want.
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/02/2013 17:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I had to actually prevent the migration to /run by changing the
boot.misc script because if I do not do that, a number of subdirectories
which I had created in /var/run were not in /run and a
I'm getting the following when restarting shorewall:
# /etc/init.d/shorewall restart
* Stopping firewall ...
* Starting firewall ...
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.
How can I find out which chain/target/match I need to compile into the
kernel? shorewall-init.log does not
Am 10.02.2013 17:39, schrieb Dale:
[...]
Actually, I had something that wouldn't start and said it needed /run.
I didn't have one, found references with google that it was the new and
upcoming thing, so I created it myself. So, it must have been a bug
that should have been reported but I
Am 10.02.2013 17:46, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/02/2013 17:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I had to actually prevent the migration to /run by changing the
boot.misc script because if I do not do that, a number of subdirectories
which I
# /etc/init.d/shorewall restart
* Stopping firewall ...
* Starting firewall ...
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.
How can I find out which chain/target/match I need to compile into the
kernel? shorewall-init.log does not indicate any problems and I have
LOG_VERBOSITY=2 in
Hi gentoo-users,
today after syncing portage tree I tried to update my system,
but I was greeted with message:
!!! Your current profile is deprecated and not supported anymore.
!!! Use eselect profile to update your profile.
!!! Please upgrade to the following profile if possible:
Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 17:39, schrieb Dale:
[...]
Actually, I had something that wouldn't start and said it needed /run.
I didn't have one, found references with google that it was the new and
upcoming thing, so I created it myself. So, it must have been a bug
that should
Jarry wrote:
Hi gentoo-users,
today after syncing portage tree I tried to update my system,
but I was greeted with message:
!!! Your current profile is deprecated and not supported anymore.
!!! Use eselect profile to update your profile.
!!! Please upgrade to the following profile if
Am Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:25:39 +0100
schrieb Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com:
Hi gentoo-users,
today after syncing portage tree I tried to update my system,
but I was greeted with message:
!!! Your current profile is deprecated and not supported anymore.
!!! Use eselect profile to update your
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:56:45 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
I guess the simplest approach is:
1. drop into single user runlevel (`rc single`)
2. move the remnants from /var/run to /run
3. symlink /var/run to /run
4. reboot or go back to default runlevel (`rc default`)
/run is a tmpfs mounted
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:42:17 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
BTW: Am I the only one annoyed by elog messages like If you are
updating from $ANCIENT_VERSION make sure to change $DEPRECATED_FEATURE
lurking in the tree for years? Especially because when you see the
message, it is a pain in the ass
Am 10.02.2013 18:56, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:56:45 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
I guess the simplest approach is:
1. drop into single user runlevel (`rc single`)
2. move the remnants from /var/run to /run
3. symlink /var/run to /run
4. reboot or go back to default
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 17:46, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/02/2013 17:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I had to actually prevent the migration to /run by changing the
boot.misc script because if I
130202 Philip Webb wrote:
130202 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
On 02.02.2013 04:54, Philip Webb wrote:
checking for alsa...
Package alsa was not found in the pkg-config search path.
... configure: error: Need alsa for Ogg, Wave or WebM decoding on Linux.
Disable with --disable-ogg
I'm prepping for updating some things I've been putting off, and I
noticed that lvm2 has some new use flags set, and I'm wondering why...
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 [2.02.88] USE=lvm1 readline
thin%* udev%* (-clvm) (-cman) (-selinux) -static* -static-libs* 1,166 kB
The two that
Am 10.02.2013 19:01, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 17:46, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/02/2013 17:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I had to actually prevent the migration to
On 2013-02-10, Jarry wrote:
Hi gentoo-users,
today after syncing portage tree I tried to update my system,
but I was greeted with message:
!!! Your current profile is deprecated and not supported anymore.
!!! Use eselect profile to update your profile.
!!! Please upgrade to the following
Am 10.02.2013 19:37, schrieb Tanstaafl:
I'm prepping for updating some things I've been putting off, and I
noticed that lvm2 has some new use flags set, and I'm wondering why...
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 [2.02.88] USE=lvm1 readline
thin%* udev%* (-clvm) (-cman) (-selinux)
On 2013-02-10 1:47 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 19:37, schrieb Tanstaafl:
I'm pretty sure that lvm2 was NOT built with either of these, but is
there a way to to tell what USE flags were used for the currently
installed package?
I guess you remember wrongly:
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 19:01, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 17:46, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/02/2013 17:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com
I guess the simplest approach is:
1. drop into single user runlevel (`rc single`)
2. move the remnants from /var/run to /run
3. symlink /var/run to /run
4. reboot or go back to default runlevel (`rc default`)
/run is a tmpfs mounted at boot time, so anything you copy in there
before
Am 2013-02-10 15:41, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 2013-02-10 11:35, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I can live with that so far ... but it would be interesting to get that
right, just to learn things.
next learnings (I maybe should write some wiki-entry somewhere to
collect all that for
Am 10.02.2013 20:07, schrieb Tanstaafl:
On 2013-02-10 1:47 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 19:37, schrieb Tanstaafl:
I'm pretty sure that lvm2 was NOT built with either of these, but is
there a way to to tell what USE flags were used for the currently
installed
Am 10.02.2013 20:17, schrieb Grant:
I guess the simplest approach is:
1. drop into single user runlevel (`rc single`)
2. move the remnants from /var/run to /run
3. symlink /var/run to /run
4. reboot or go back to default runlevel (`rc default`)
/run is a tmpfs mounted at boot time, so
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 2013-02-10 15:41, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 2013-02-10 11:35, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I can live with that so far ... but it would be interesting to get that
right, just to learn things.
next
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:07:38 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
So, the question becomes, why did these change? I do have /user on a
separate LVM partition, so, is this something I should worry about?
The static use flag builds a separate lvm.static all-in-one binary
more suitable for use in an
On 2013-02-10 2:57 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:07:38 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
So, the question becomes, why did these change? I do have /user on a
separate LVM partition, so, is this something I should worry about?
The static use flag builds a separate
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:40:00 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
Here's what IUSE says are enabled for the currently installed lvm2:
readline +static +static-libs clvm cman +lvm1 selinux
IUSE shows the flags that were available to that build, USE shows the
flags that were used.
--
Neil Bothwick
I
On 10/02/2013 20:01, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 17:46, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/02/2013 17:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I had to actually prevent the migration to /run
On 10/02/2013 19:25, Jarry wrote:
Hi gentoo-users,
today after syncing portage tree I tried to update my system,
but I was greeted with message:
!!! Your current profile is deprecated and not supported anymore.
!!! Use eselect profile to update your profile.
!!! Please upgrade to the
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/02/2013 20:01, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 17:46, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/02/2013 17:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com
Hello!
After a recent upgrade to LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 Impress refuses to
import a video file in .mpg format. I had no such problems with LO-3.6
before. Maybe some dependencies have also changed -- I don't know.
So, my question is: what is necessary to install in order to be able
to embed
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:47:58 +0200, v...@ukr.net wrote:
After a recent upgrade to LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 Impress refuses to
import a video file in .mpg format. I had no such problems with LO-3.6
before. Maybe some dependencies have also changed -- I don't know.
So, my question is: what is
Hello!
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 21:52:41 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:47:58 +0200, v...@ukr.net wrote:
After a recent upgrade to LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 Impress refuses to
import a video file in .mpg format. I had no such problems with
LO-3.6 before.
On 7 February 2013, at 21:37, Tanstaafl wrote:
...
I believe he is correct and /dev/shm is irrelevant for this discussion.
Ok, thanks, but... and no offense...
I am not willing to gamble on breaking a remotely accessed server based on
someone's 'I believe that this is correct' comment.
On 10 February 2013, at 05:05, Grant wrote:
...
Your server is just a single computer, running multiple processes.
Each request from a user (be it you or someone else) requires a
certain amount of resources while it's executing. If there aren't
enough resources, some of the requests will
How can that be
only captures STDOUT, not STDERR. So the file.txt should be a subset of
what's displayed on the console.
57 matches
Mail list logo
