On 04/25/13 00:16, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
On 4/24/2013 19:23, Joseph wrote:
The above is not correct as users from any machine on a local network
can connect to my database.
In the scenario you described, as Joost explained, the users on your
network are *not* connecting to your database; they
On 4/24/2013 19:23, Joseph wrote:
The above is not correct as users from any machine on a local network
can connect to my database.
In the scenario you described, as Joost explained, the users on your
network are *not* connecting to your database; they are connecting to a
website. The web serv
On Apr 24, 2013 2:29 AM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> On 2013-04-22 8:56 AM, Andre Lucas Falco wrote:
>>
>> 2013/4/21 Tanstaafl wrote:
>>>
>>> Windows VMs see get an 'LSI Logic SAS', and my gentoo VM gets an
>>> 'LSI Logic Parallel' controller.
>
>
>> Did you tested using pvscsi? It's improve performa
On 04/24/13 22:27, J. Roeleveld wrote:
The connection to the database is done by apache. Apache connects from the
server where Apache is running.
Postgresql does not know nor even care where the connection to apache
originates from. It only sees apache connecting to it.
If you want to preven
On 04/24/13 22:27, J. Roeleveld wrote:
[snip]
Thank you for explanation.
That is what I'm confused about. When I connect to "pstgresql"
database from the same machine as postgres is running on I can
understand.
It is a local connection from localhost (127.0.0.1) so everybody is
allowed but I d
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:04:27 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> I don't know if it's configurable somewhere, but I vaguely recall
> seeing an occasional bootup where I get a message about the system
> having gone more than X days without being fsck'd. So it helpfully
> does it for me automatically and
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:22:36PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> On 24/04/2013 11:37, Philip Webb wrote:
> > 130424 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >>> 130423 Philip Webb hadn't read any horror stories re Reiser 3 :
> >> Where have you been for the last ten years?
> >
> > Reading this list & various Linux n
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>
> Hello, William.
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:59:54PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:49:19AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > > > Feel free to remove PA if you don't need it. I really don't see any
> > > > scop
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:46:12PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:12:56AM +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote
>
> > >> Of course from many threads from a pro audio user called Ralf, Gentoo
> > >> users and so a fraction of Linux users are the only ones lucky enough
> > >> to be a
Joseph wrote:
>On 04/24/13 07:11, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>On Wed, April 24, 2013 00:16, Joseph wrote:
>>> On 04/23/13 20:10, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
I am guessing Apache is running on the same machine as your
>Postgresql
server?
In this case. The connection will always ori
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:45:21 -0400, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Who's paying for this bandwith?
What bandwidth? We're discussing disk space usage. Unless you're
referring to the bandwidth consumed by the discussion, which jumps
massively every time someone quotes and reposts an entire email to add a
on
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:44:18 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> > The warnquota command, from sys-fs/quota, does this for all user and
> > all filesystems with a single command called from cron. Yes, you could
> > reinvent the wheel with a shell script, but the wheel already exists
> > for filesystems other
Who's paying for this bandwith?
N.
On 4/24/13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:07:05 +0100, Stroller wrote:
>
>> > That only works on small systems. I have systems here where a 'du' on
>> > /home would take hours and produce massive IO wait, because there's so
>> > much data in the
On 24 April 2013, at 19:32, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> ...
>> Your system must be more complex than I'm imagining, because I see this
>> obvious answer of a bash script which loops through /home/*, runs `du`
>> or `df` and sends an email to anyone who's consuming more than 90%.
>> Obviously this need
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:07:05 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> > That only works on small systems. I have systems here where a 'du' on
> > /home would take hours and produce massive IO wait, because there's so
> > much data in there.
>
> Of course. Excuse me.
>
> My original idea was in respect of the
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:38:42 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> > Sometimes a simplistic rule is what's needed. If you are selling
> > off-site storage in 1GB chunks, you need to stop people using more
> > than they have paid for. Hard quotas do this, soft quotas let you
> > warn them first, before things g
On 24 April 2013, at 18:53, Michael Hampicke wrote:
>> ...
>> Your system must be more complex than I'm imagining, because I see this
>> obvious answer of a bash script which loops through /home/*, runs `du` or
>> `df` and sends an email to anyone who's consuming more than 90%. Obviously
>> thi
On 24 April 2013, at 15:10, James wrote:
> ...
> What I'm really (eventually) after is a way to send
> a custom emoticon, tied to a specific trirgger.
> For example, every hour, I'd like to send a measured
> temperature from a remote linux system to the mail
> box on another system, that looks lik
Am 24.04.2013 19:38, schrieb Stroller:
>
> On 24 April 2013, at 11:16, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Volume size so far fits my needs just fine, but that's because I've
>>> never needed quotas as such. I find quotas too inflexible anyway, it's a
>>> case of forcing a simplistic hardware rule in
On 24 April 2013, at 11:16, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> ...
>> Volume size so far fits my needs just fine, but that's because I've
>> never needed quotas as such. I find quotas too inflexible anyway, it's a
>> case of forcing a simplistic hardware rule into the human space and that
>> never really sol
Anyone?
On 2013-04-23 3:28 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-04-22 8:56 AM, Andre Lucas Falco wrote:
2013/4/21 Tanstaafl wrote:
Windows VMs see get an 'LSI Logic SAS', and my gentoo VM gets an
'LSI Logic Parallel' controller.
Did you tested using pvscsi? It's improve performance with less cos
On 04/24/2013 11:39 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-04-23 12:34 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
>> Am 23.04.2013 16:44, schrieb Tanstaafl:
>>> /boot (ext2), 100M
>>> /swap, 2G
>>> / (ext4), 40G
>>>
>>> then on LVM
>>>
>>> /tmp (ext2), 5G? <- how big?
>>> /var/tmp (ext2), 5G? <- how big?
>
>> If this is
On 2013-04-24 11:31 AM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 24.04.2013 17:12, schrieb Tanstaafl:
Ok, but - does it make sense to add the noexec option to /var/tmp? Is it
possible that there are other apps that need exec capability in there?
It makes sense. Any world-writable directory should be noexec
On 2013-04-23 12:34 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 23.04.2013 16:44, schrieb Tanstaafl:
/boot (ext2), 100M
/swap, 2G
/ (ext4), 40G
then on LVM
/tmp (ext2), 5G? <- how big?
/var/tmp (ext2), 5G? <- how big?
If this is a production server I wouldn't use ext2. In the case of a
crash or reboot,
Am 24.04.2013 17:12, schrieb Tanstaafl:
> On 2013-04-24 8:48 AM, Florian Philipp wrote:
>>> One thing I'm trying to do is make the system as secure as
>>> possible at the filesystem level, and I've read that making /tmp
>>> and /var/tmp separate partitions so you can mount them
>>> /nodev/noexec/n
On 2013-04-24 6:27 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Here's my pair of MTAs:
$ uptime
12:24PM up 1295 days, 13:10, 1 user, load averages: 0.19, 0.20, 0.31
$ uptime
12:24PM up 1925 days, 20:30, 4 users, load averages: 0.90, 0.75, 0.84
Those two just keep on accepting and dealing with mail, they do th
On 2013-04-24 8:48 AM, Florian Philipp wrote:
One thing I'm trying to do is make the system as secure as
possible at the filesystem level, and I've read that making /tmp
and /var/tmp separate partitions so you can mount them
/nodev/noexec/nosuid is one way to make things a bit more
secure...
>
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:17:26 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> So I continue to believe that Reiser 3 is remarkably reliable,
> at least if you don't try running it virtually on itself
> or blame hardware problems on the software.
I didn't say otherwise, in fact I've already posted to this thread about
On 2013-04-24 1:22 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
- avoid Postfix and Qmail
Eh???
Been running postfix/courier-imap and now dovecot for 8+ years on
reiserfs with zarro problems... including a few scary moments after 2
unclean shutdown events due to extended power outage and the UPS not
sending the
Stroller stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes:
> Stroller.
> [1]
http://thommck.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/youve-got-emoji-smilie-characters-discovered-in-a-font/
> [2] http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/
> [3] https://github.com/android/platform_frameworks_base/tree/master/data/fonts
> [4]
http://www.xda-d
Am 24.04.2013 12:48, schrieb Tanstaafl:
> On 2013-04-23 1:59 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:34:38 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
>>
So - first, is 5G way too big for the two /tmp dirs? I have lots of
space, but hate waste
>
>>> If you worry about waste consider bind-m
On 04/24/13 07:11, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wed, April 24, 2013 00:16, Joseph wrote:
On 04/23/13 20:10, J. Roeleveld wrote:
I am guessing Apache is running on the same machine as your Postgresql
server?
In this case. The connection will always originate from localhost and
Postgresql is beha
On 2013-04-23 1:59 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:34:38 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
So - first, is 5G way too big for the two /tmp dirs? I have lots of
space, but hate waste
If you worry about waste consider bind-mounting both from the same
partition and install quotas to
Hello, William.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:59:54PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:49:19AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > > Feel free to remove PA if you don't need it. I really don't see any
> > > scope for Lennart to make all of alsa redundant anytime soon (unlike
> >
On 24/04/2013 12:17, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:10:56 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>>> "Some directory operations (including unlink(2)) are not synchronous
>>> on ReiserFS, which can result in data corruption with applications
>>> relying heavily on file-based locks (such as ma
On 24/04/2013 11:37, Philip Webb wrote:
> 130424 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> 130423 Philip Webb hadn't read any horror stories re Reiser 3 :
>> Where have you been for the last ten years?
>
> Reading this list & various Linux news sites.
>
>> A quick search of this list's archives will reveal severa
Am 24.04.2013 04:46, schrieb Walter Dnes:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:12:56AM +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote
>
Of course from many threads from a pro audio user called Ralf, Gentoo
users and so a fraction of Linux users are the only ones lucky enough
to be able to do that *easily* w
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:10:56 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > "Some directory operations (including unlink(2)) are not synchronous
> > on ReiserFS, which can result in data corruption with applications
> > relying heavily on file-based locks (such as mail transfer agents
> > qmail[9] and Postfix[10
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:08:12 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > It's a shame there appears to be no equivalent of a soft quota in ZFS.
> > Maybe it is the use of the term quota that is misleading, when in
> > reality it is more akin to volume size.
>
> "quota" is this context is indeed a misleadin
On 24/04/2013 11:21, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:00:06 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
- avoid Postfix and Qmail
>>>
>>> Why? I ask because I have a mail server with reiserfs on the mail
>>> spool, it's been running for several years and behaved impeccably,
>>> but if there
On 24/04/2013 11:27, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:50:11 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> Then I want to tell the system how much storage I want for what purpose.
>> If Joe Blow is to get 20G of storage for his ~, I want to tell the
>> system there is a thing called joeb and it has
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:50:11 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > Then I want to tell the system how much storage I want for what purpose.
> > If Joe Blow is to get 20G of storage for his ~, I want to tell the
> > system there is a thing called joeb and it has a hard quota of
130424 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> 130423 Philip Webb hadn't read any horror stories re Reiser 3 :
> Where have you been for the last ten years?
Reading this list & various Linux news sites.
> A quick search of this list's archives will reveal several.
If it's so easy, please point me to a couple (s
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:50:11 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Then I want to tell the system how much storage I want for what purpose.
> If Joe Blow is to get 20G of storage for his ~, I want to tell the
> system there is a thing called joeb and it has a hard quota of 20G. The
> software must then go
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:00:06 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> - avoid Postfix and Qmail
> >
> > Why? I ask because I have a mail server with reiserfs on the mail
> > spool, it's been running for several years and behaved impeccably,
> > but if there is a good reason to switch, I will.
>
> It
On 24/04/2013 10:24, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:22:37 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
>> I have mix of various sizes. The best feature about ReiserFS is that
>> it doesn't do inodes, so I don't have to be psychic about my future file
>> mix when I format the partition. For that
This same thing also happened to me once when the disk was full.
Cheers,
Paul
Good news here, I added
nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 8.8.4.4
to my /etc/resolv.conf,logout and login,no pause before splash
appeared.Then I rebooted,/etc/resolv was automatically changed back
and the PAUSE came
On 04/24/2013 10:26:52 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
SUSE are using btrfs in SLES, so it can't be that experimental or
unstable
any more.
That depends on the version of the kernel in use. I remember having
lost all data of a
btrfs file system with an early 3.x kernel. Meanwhile there have been
On 24/04/2013 10:27, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
> I stay away for Btrfs for now. And to be frank I don't quite like
> Btrfs's, and ZFS's for that matter, approach of throwing together all
> the layers, from the file-system, to the RAID, to the block
> management, etc. I find the layered approach
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
wrote:
> [...] So when I needed to install a
> new machine, I looked around and settled on JFS. This box has been
> running for about half a year now (so that includes several power
> failures) without any problems. I certainly am very pleased with
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:37:52 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > I've used ReiserFS3 for years with no problems,
> > but I keep hearing horror stories about it.
>
> I haven't read any horror stories re Reiser 3 ,
Where have you been f0r the last ten years? A quick search of this list's
archives will
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:22:37 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> I have mix of various sizes. The best feature about ReiserFS is that
> it doesn't do inodes, so I don't have to be psychic about my future file
> mix when I format the partition. For that reason alone, I'm tempted to
> stay with ReiserFS
52 matches
Mail list logo
