Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

On 08/16/2013 07:29 AM, Alessio Ababilov wrote: > 2013/8/13 Canek Peláez Valdés mailto:can...@gmail.com>> > > I think it's a great experiment, but perhaps too much work for little > gain, at least currently. > > Thank you! > > The next council meeting will vote if separated /usr wit

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph and a possible python problem

On 16/08/13 22:31, William Kenworthy wrote: > On 16/08/13 22:15, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:12 AM, William Kenworthy >> wrote: >>> On 16/08/13 15:34, Keith Dart wrote: Re , William Kenworthy said: > olympus ~ # ceph > File "/usr/bin/ceph", line 192

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge -e errors right after install

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:18:35PM -0300, Francisco Ares wrote > You were right. I have overlooked the type of the new machine's CPU (it is > a "Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU" and the other one, already working, is a > "Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU"). So, a "march=nocona" instead of a > "march=core2" s

Re: How hard is it to move separate /usr to / partition? - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:04:35 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > > And really, maybe you could try an initramfs? It will be much more > > easy than any juggle of filesystems. > > I always compile my kernels manually, by choice - so, no desire to use > genkernel or dracut. > > How would I then create on

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:04:38 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > >> For the folks who lost /etc/conf.d/net, was it the stub file that came >> with OpenRC, or had you modify it? > > I've tried the update on two systems, both with modified config fil

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge -e errors right after install

2013/8/16 Francisco Ares > > 2013/8/16 Michael Palimaka > >> On 16/08/2013 23:22, Francisco Ares wrote: >> >>> 26892 Illegal instruction | $AWK -f "$ac_tmp/subs.awk" > >>> 31167 Illegal instruction | $AWK -f "$tmp/subs.awk" > $tmp/out >>> >> > [...] >> >> I have built binary

Re: How hard is it to move separate /usr to / partition? - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> And really, maybe you could try an initramfs? It will be much more >> easy than any juggle of filesystems. > > > I always compile my kernels manually, by choice - so, no desire to use > genkernel or dracut. > > How would I then create one? I am

Re: How hard is it to move separate /usr to / partition? - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > Thanks for the reply Canek > > > On 2013-08-16 10:48 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> >> If you have physical access to the system, > > > I do. > > >> and a large enough /, > > > Well... > > / is 19GB, with 18GB available. > > /usr is 20GB, wi

Re: How hard is it to move separate /usr to / partition? - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

On 16/08/2013 17:04, Tanstaafl wrote: > Thanks for the reply Canek > > On 2013-08-16 10:48 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> If you have physical access to the system, > > I do. > >> and a large enough /, > > Well... > > / is 19GB, with 18GB available. > > /usr is 20GB, with 13GB used, with

Re: How hard is it to move separate /usr to / partition? - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

Thanks for the reply Canek On 2013-08-16 10:48 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: If you have physical access to the system, I do. and a large enough /, Well... / is 19GB, with 18GB available. /usr is 20GB, with 13GB used, with 7.9GB available. I guess I'd be ok with going from 18GB availa

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge -e errors right after install

2013/8/16 Michael Palimaka > On 16/08/2013 23:22, Francisco Ares wrote: > >> 26892 Illegal instruction | $AWK -f "$ac_tmp/subs.awk" > >> 31167 Illegal instruction | $AWK -f "$tmp/subs.awk" > $tmp/out >> > > [...] > > I have built binary packages for "sed" and "gawk", created

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon

* Rich Freeman [130816 10:43]: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people > > lost their net configs > > > > So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice > > And hence the value of having a group of volunt

Re: How hard is it to move separate /usr to / partition? - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > So, in order to fix a system I'd rather not reinstall from scratch... > > Is this possible? Easy? Recommended? If you have physical access to the system, and a large enough /, it's really easy. You boot from a livecd, mount /usr in another direc

How hard is it to move separate /usr to / partition? - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

So, in order to fix a system I'd rather not reinstall from scratch... Is this possible? Easy? Recommended?

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph and a possible python problem

On 16/08/13 22:15, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:12 AM, William Kenworthy wrote: >> On 16/08/13 15:34, Keith Dart wrote: >>> Re , William Kenworthy said: olympus ~ # ceph File "/usr/bin/ceph", line 192 print '\n', s, '\n', '=' * len(s)

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph and a possible python problem

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:12 AM, William Kenworthy wrote: > On 16/08/13 15:34, Keith Dart wrote: >> Re , William Kenworthy said: >>> olympus ~ # ceph >>> File "/usr/bin/ceph", line 192 >>> print '\n', s, '\n', '=' * len(s) >>> ^ >>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax >>> olympus ~ # >>

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph and a possible python problem

On 16/08/13 15:34, Keith Dart wrote: > Re , William Kenworthy said: >> olympus ~ # ceph >> File "/usr/bin/ceph", line 192 >> print '\n', s, '\n', '=' * len(s) >> ^ >> SyntaxError: invalid syntax >> olympus ~ # > > > In Python 3 "print" is a function, and should be called like t

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon

On 14 August 2013 16:43, Keith Dart wrote: > Re , William Hubbs said: >> All, >> >> This message is an announcement and a reminder. >> >> OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few >> days. >> >> If you are using ~arch OpenRc, the standard disclaimer applies: >> remember th

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2013-08-16 8:29 AM, Alessio Ababilov wrote: >> >> 2013/8/13 Canek Peláez Valdés mailto:can...@gmail.com>> >> >> >> I think it's a great experiment, but perhaps too much work for little >> gain, at least currently. >> >> Thank you! >>

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge -e errors right after install

On 16/08/2013 23:22, Francisco Ares wrote: 26892 Illegal instruction | $AWK -f "$ac_tmp/subs.awk" > 31167 Illegal instruction | $AWK -f "$tmp/subs.awk" > $tmp/out > [...] I have built binary packages for "sed" and "gawk", created in a machine with the same characteristics an

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Alessio Ababilov wrote: > 2013/8/13 Canek Peláez Valdés >> >> I think it's a great experiment, but perhaps too much work for little >> gain, at least currently. >> > Thank you! >> >> The next council meeting will vote if separated /usr without and >> initramfs is

[gentoo-user] emerge -e errors right after install

Hello, all. Gentoo is absolutely great. This is mainly to make clear I am pretty satisfied on how things are made to let us have a Linux distro that does not use binary packages, everything being built almost from the ground up. But (here comes the "but"), right on the point I was able to build

[gentoo-user] Advice needed regarding udisks

I'm having a problem detaching a USB camera from a desktop. I found a Ubuntu bug for the problem which states that it is a bug in udisks-1 which won't be fixed upstream and the solution is to upgrade to Ubuntu 12.10 which uses udisks-2. Can anyone recommend a good course of action for me here? H

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

On 2013-08-16 8:29 AM, Alessio Ababilov wrote: 2013/8/13 Canek Peláez Valdés mailto:can...@gmail.com>> I think it's a great experiment, but perhaps too much work for little gain, at least currently. Thank you! The next council meeting will vote if separated /usr without and in

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013/8/13 Canek Peláez Valdés > I think it's a great experiment, but perhaps too much work for little > gain, at least currently. > > Thank you! > The next council meeting will vote if separated /usr without and > initramfs is officially supported by Gentoo; I hope this time around > finally is

Re: [gentoo-user] What (free) remote desktop do you use

Re , Helmut Jarausch said: > What remote desktop do you use? ssh. ;) -- Keith -- -- ~ Keith Dart public key: ID: 19017044 ===

Re: [gentoo-user] ceph and a possible python problem

Re , William Kenworthy said: > olympus ~ # ceph > File "/usr/bin/ceph", line 192 > print '\n', s, '\n', '=' * len(s) > ^ > SyntaxError: invalid syntax > olympus ~ # In Python 3 "print" is a function, and should be called like this: print('\n', s, '\n', '=' * len(s)) This w