Had problems configuring the static network inside a gentoo VM.
The network never came up but when I logged in and started the
network.service manually it worked. Strange.
The mentioned service-file was the one here (my posting with /bin/ip):
Am 28.08.2013 08:03, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Had problems configuring the static network inside a gentoo VM.
The network never came up but when I logged in and started the
network.service manually it worked. Strange.
before you ask: yes, the service was enabled correctly
Am 27.08.2013 18:57, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
Canek, how to best tell the gentoo-devs about all these files?
Filing bugs for every single file?
Yeah, to the package in question. Probably with a CC to the systemd
team, so they add the unit file if the maintainer takes too much to
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:27:30 -0400, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1, all the commands
from 2.1.x.y will continue to work? I know that several readers have
used 2.2 for years with success.
The commands will, but there may be better alternatives
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/08/2013 14:05, Tanstaafl wrote:
[-- snippy --]
Thanks Alan, starting to get excited about playing with ZFS.
How would you rate their docs and support community (for the free version)?
Support is
On 2013-08-27 5:06 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
You wrote that modules become derivatives of the Linux kernel and this is the
same as writing ZFS would become a kernel derivative.
Just for clarification, I was talking about compiling ZFS support INTO
the
On 2013-08-27 5:27 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I was away for two weeks. I just resynced and see that 2.2.1 is now in
testing (and my current version 2.1.13.1 is not in the tree).
Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1, all the commands
from 2.1.x.y will
On 28/08/2013 13:04, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-27 5:27 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I was away for two weeks. I just resynced and see that 2.2.1 is now in
testing (and my current version 2.1.13.1 is not in the tree).
Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1,
On 28/08/2013 12:58, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-27 5:06 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
You wrote that modules become derivatives of the Linux kernel and this
is the
same as writing ZFS would become a kernel derivative.
Just for clarification, I was talking
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-08-27 5:06 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
You wrote that modules become derivatives of the Linux kernel and this is
the
same as writing ZFS would become a kernel derivative.
Just for clarification, I
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:04:39 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
So... is 2.2 *ever* going to go stable???
Give it a chance! It's only just come out of rc. Until recently it
wasn't even available in testing without umasking.
--
Neil Bothwick
Does fuzzy logic tickle?
signature.asc
Description: PGP
2013/8/28 Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz
Am 27.08.2013 22:40, schrieb Francisco Ares:
I think I might have found it. Although I have selected in the kernel
menuconfig to compress the initramfs using gzip and deselected all
other
decompression forms. a simple file initramfs-xxx told me
2013/8/28 Francisco Ares fra...@gmail.com
2013/8/28 Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz
Am 27.08.2013 22:40, schrieb Francisco Ares:
I think I might have found it. Although I have selected in the kernel
menuconfig to compress the initramfs using gzip and deselected all
other
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
While trying to learn about dracut, I found a detail that made me look
closer to the genkernel generated initramfs, and I found that the error
message was perfectly clear: there was no /dev/sda5, where my real_root
is, that initramfs has just /dev/sda1 to
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:04:39 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
So... is 2.2 *ever* going to go stable???
Hopefully, 2.2.1 will be stabilized. See zmedico's comments 5 and 6 at
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478904#c5.
15 matches
Mail list logo
