On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:45:31 +0100 Marc Stürmer m...@marc-stuermer.de wrote:
Am 25.11.2014 um 18:44 schrieb Gevisz:
It usually took me from 10 to 20 minutes to download my daily updates
in Ubuntu. For big packages - about 40 minutes or even more.
That's the time saving aspect
lol
On 25/11/14 23:35, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
On 25 November 2014 at 23:42, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
The point was that it could be changed. […]
[…] It's about as on-topic and relevant as WinXP.
No, the point was that sometimes even a small annoyance is plenty
enough to drive
On 24/11/14 19:13, Marc Stürmer wrote:
Am 24.11.2014 um 19:25 schrieb Gevisz:
I switched from Ubuntu 10.04 to Gentoo just because it forced closing
window button x to the upper-left corner of the window in Unity of
Ubuntu 12.04 while I used to look for it in the upper-right corner. :)
So, I
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:06:23 +, thegeezer wrote:
* stable releases with a more or less stable and predictable release
cycle,
debatable - i would suggest better tested than stable otherwise there
would be no need for debian bugzilla
The vagaries of English strike again! When Debian
Is this possible?
I have two layman repos I have added at some point in time in the past:
sunrise, and ultrabug.
I'd like to see what, if any packages, I have installed from them, and
see if I can remove them and ultimately remove the layman repo.
Thanks
man eix
...
--in-overlay overlay
Only match packages with at least one version in an overlay matching
overlay.
--only-in-overlay overlay
Only match packages which have only versions in an overlay matching
overlay.
-J, --installed-overlay
Only
On 2014-11-22 18:12, wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
The first 100 or so I looked at, are deprecated. They just need
somebody
to 'remove them' the BGO java backlog is being artificially used to
prevent java work on gentoo. Somebody of authority needs to open
up java for other folks to work on.
On 11/26/2014 9:28 AM, Александр Паутов sh2d0...@gmail.com wrote:
man eix
Ah, I thought I'd need to do this with the layman command.
Thanks!
-J, --installed-overlay
Only match packages which have been installed from some overlay.
To get a completely reliable
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:21 AM, thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote:
all of gentoo council meetings happen on irc if i remember right so it's not
like there is an elite group deciding fate they are just sorting things that
need to be sorted.
Per Gentoo's social contract [1] we try to be open
Rich Freeman:
There has been a
desire for a long time to try to make it easier to contribute, but in
the end people have to step up to make that happen. Those who are
most passionate about it are of course the best candidates to try to
drive change.
That's a common misconception in
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:29 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
That's a common misconception in gentoo. Someone has an idea and no one
cares until he makes it happen. A lot of ideas are not so trivial that
you can just make it happen. You need consensus, a shift of thinking,
workflow
Am Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:35:37 +0100
schrieb Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de:
Hey list
during yesterday's upgrade I read the news about python 3.4 being the
new profile default.
[...]
Perhaps you've noticed by now, but the change was reverted in the meantime.
Furthermore, eselect news shows
I still don't see a good argument why we made our system so inflexible,
that obviously needed change needs such high amount of work, PR and proof.
Trying to improve gaming in gentoo took me 2 years full of work just to
realize it is a dead end and I am doing most of the work alone.
The necessity
On 26/11/14 18:23, Marc Joliet wrote:
Am Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:35:37 +0100
schrieb Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de:
Hey list
during yesterday's upgrade I read the news about python 3.4 being the
new profile default.
[...]
Perhaps you've noticed by now, but the change was reverted in the
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:23:48 +0100
Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:35:37 +0100
schrieb Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de:
Hey list
during yesterday's upgrade I read the news about python 3.4 being
the new profile default.
[...]
Perhaps you've noticed by
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:29 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't know of literally any big project except gentoo that still does
not _require_ a review workflow. Git would be the perfect excuse to
make it
On 26-Nov-14 21:03, »Q« wrote:
during yesterday's upgrade I read the news about python 3.4 being
the new profile default.
[...]
Perhaps you've noticed by now, but the change was reverted in the
meantime.
Furthermore, eselect news shows that the news entry got deleted, too:
% eselect news
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:28 PM, konsolebox konsole...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it really official that most significant people on Gentoo don't like the
change from CVS to Git? Has there been a general discussion about it, and
what is basically everyone's general argument to it? Just in case
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:39:17AM +0200, Gevisz wrote
Moreover, if I had to maintain computers for *other* users, I would not
mind to upgrade their binary distributions every 2 or, better, every 5 years
even if *their* working environment would every time change from Gnome2
to Unity and
Am 26.11.2014 um 21:39 schrieb Walter Dnes:
I've been running ICEWM for over 4 years, and blackbox for a few years
before that. What desktop interface change? :)
Switching to ratpoison or i3wm, of course. :
Am 26.11.2014 um 21:39 schrieb Rich Freeman:
Most devs can't wait to switch to git. There are a few who might
prefer to stick with cvs but overall I don't think that is preventing
us from switching at all.
(without having read the whole thread, sorry)
my *personal opinion* is that git
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/11/14 06:28, thegeezer wrote:
On 26/11/14 18:23, Marc Joliet wrote:
Am Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:35:37 +0100 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger
war...@gmx.de:
during yesterday's upgrade I read the news about python 3.4
being the new profile default.
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:59:28 +1100
wraeth wra...@wraeth.id.au wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/11/14 06:28, thegeezer wrote:
On 26/11/14 18:23, Marc Joliet wrote:
Am Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:35:37 +0100 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger
war...@gmx.de:
during
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Sometimes I wonder why syncing portage isn't yet available via git ;-)
Well, right now it is because it is too much of a pain to try to keep
cvs and git in sync.
However, the plan for the future is to have a master
you might check out webrsync fwiw
On 11/26/14 23:43, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Sometimes I wonder why syncing portage isn't yet available via git ;-)
Well, right now it is because it is too much of a pain to try to keep
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Paige Thompson erra...@yourstruly.sx wrote:
you might check out webrsync fwiw
Webrsync is great, of course, but not really the same thing as git.
Changelogs will also go away when we move to git.
--
Rich
You know I don't think thats going to happen because if you look at
layman its not as if they didn't think of using git for package trees;
all of them do use git.
A good example of why I don't think they will be using git for portage:
``git clone https://git.kernel.org'
This takes a very long
Have a look at this
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2935899/is-there-any-git-repository-with-official-daily-updated-gentoo-portage
On 11/27/14 02:03, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Paige Thompson erra...@yourstruly.sx wrote:
you might check out webrsync fwiw
Webrsync
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Paige Thompson erra...@yourstruly.sx wrote:
A good example of why I don't think they will be using git for portage:
``git clone https://git.kernel.org'
This takes a very long time and a lot of bandwidth and a lot of space.
Why move data that isn't going to be
Paige Thompson:
You know I don't think thats going to happen because if you look at
layman its not as if they didn't think of using git for package trees;
all of them do use git.
A good example of why I don't think they will be using git for portage:
``git clone https://git.kernel.org'
30 matches
Mail list logo
