tl;dr: Is an update to the myspell-en Oxford spelling dictionary really
wanted by anyone?
If you don't know or don't care, you can safely ignore all the rest.
app-dicts/myspell-en-20081002 works, but newer, better
dictionaries are available. It's maintainer-wanted, so I'm taking
a crack at an u
I would also recommend the tp-link.
On 2 May 2015 at 17:17, wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
> > Am 27.04.2015 um 20:37 schrieb waben...@gmail.com:
> > > I'm searching for a new WLAN-AP that is fast, powerful and
> > > reliable. I can remember that there were some recommendations in
> > > this list some weeks/months ago, but
On 07.05.2015 13:21, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't think this produces VM interfaces that are
> visible outside of the subnet. I made some live changes a while ago
> (and need to figure out what they were - probably routing stuff). In
> any case, you should be able to create the tap device
On Thu, 07 May 2015 08:47:34 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 06/05/2015 23:01, »Q« wrote:
> > At the time, I was on the lookout for such a news item and I never
> > saw one. Always possible that was my fault, but I really think
> > there was no such item.
> >
> > Also, if I've correctly unders
# ip link
3: enp2s0:
5: tap0:
6: tap1:
7: br0:
Assign what was the host machine's IP to br0. The guests on tap0 and
tap1 should have IP addresses different from this, configured within
the guest.
# ip route
192.168.1.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.2
Now, the config tha
On 06.05.2015 23:14, Poison BL. wrote:
> If you need the VMs outwardly visible, I can't think of a way to do it
> without losing connection upon switching to the bridge (granted, I'm far
> from an expert on bridging under linux). If you're fine with the VMs being
> behind a NAT, and your kernel ha
7 matches
Mail list logo
