I don't get why any distro leaves this out, why anyone wouldn't like to
automatically notice while booting any announcement that something failed,
especially someone who has just gotten a new installation up for the first
times. Why isn't --noclear set by default?
Once I set this and rebooted I
Fernando Rodriguez frodriguez.develo...@outlook.com [15-08-08 05:43]:
On Friday, August 07, 2015 9:44:50 PM meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com [15-08-07 20:04]:
On Friday 07 Aug 2015 04:27:15 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
On Thursday, August 06, 2015 6:18:59 PM
On Saturday 08 Aug 2015 07:57:29 Felix Miata wrote:
I don't get why any distro leaves this out, why anyone wouldn't like to
automatically notice while booting any announcement that something failed,
especially someone who has just gotten a new installation up for the first
times. Why isn't
On Saturday, August 08, 2015 2:57:29 AM Felix Miata wrote:
I don't get why any distro leaves this out, why anyone wouldn't like to
automatically notice while booting any announcement that something failed,
especially someone who has just gotten a new installation up for the first
times. Why
Fernando Rodriguez composed on 2015-08-08 03:43 (UTC-0400):
Felix Miata wrote:
I don't get why any distro leaves this out, why anyone wouldn't like to
automatically notice while booting any announcement that something failed,
especially someone who has just gotten a new installation up for
On Saturday, August 08, 2015 4:45:06 AM Felix Miata wrote:
Fernando Rodriguez composed on 2015-08-08 03:43 (UTC-0400):
Felix Miata wrote:
I don't get why any distro leaves this out, why anyone wouldn't like to
automatically notice while booting any announcement that something
failed,
On Saturday, August 08, 2015 4:55:03 AM Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
On Saturday, August 08, 2015 4:45:06 AM Felix Miata wrote:
Fernando Rodriguez composed on 2015-08-08 03:43 (UTC-0400):
Felix Miata wrote:
I don't get why any distro leaves this out, why anyone wouldn't like to
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 05:13:06 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
To remove safely now you should run:
emerge --deselect dev-haskell/hostname
followed by:
emerge --depclean
That will remove it only if it's not needed by some other package.
Or emerge --depclean --ask --verbose
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 02:57:29 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
I don't get why any distro leaves this out, why anyone wouldn't like to
automatically notice while booting any announcement that something
failed, especially someone who has just gotten a new installation up
for the first times. Why isn't
On 08/08/2015 14:23, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 05:13:06 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
To remove safely now you should run:
emerge --deselect dev-haskell/hostname
followed by:
emerge --depclean
That will remove it only if it's not needed by some other package.
Or emerge
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:32:48 -0500, J. Rutkowski wrote:
There was no installer other than the handbook.
There was the former Gentoo installer project [1] but it was
discontinued in 2009. The source is still available [2]
You have taken my statement out of context. It looks like I was
On 08/08/2015 14:26, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 02:57:29 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
I don't get why any distro leaves this out, why anyone wouldn't like to
automatically notice while booting any announcement that something
failed, especially someone who has just gotten a new
J. Rutkowski jrtk at kow.io writes:
There was no installer other than the handbook.
OOppssee there was I have several images::
livecd-amd64-installer-2008.0-r1.iso
There was the former Gentoo installer project [1] but it was
discontinued in 2009. The source is still available [2]
On 2015-08-08, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
I don't get why any distro leaves this out, why anyone wouldn't like to
automatically notice while booting any announcement that something failed,
especially someone who has just gotten a new installation up for the first
times. Why
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:00:29 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Yep, I find it infuriating that by default all distros seem to go to
great effort to hide as much information about the boot/startup
process as possible. WTF? Do they think that stuff is top secret or
something? Are they afraid
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:41:27 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
The next
big change is likely to be virtualizing openrc so that it can be
uninstalled, and possibly not including it in the stage3, but that
hasn't really even been seriously discussed. (Virtualizing it seems
almost
On Saturday 08 Aug 2015 18:02:00 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:00:29 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Yep, I find it infuriating that by default all distros seem to go to
great effort to hide as much information about the boot/startup
process as possible. WTF? Do they think
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards at gmail.com writes:
I don't get why any distro leaves this out, why anyone wouldn't like to
automatically notice while booting any announcement that something failed,
especially someone who has just gotten a new installation up for the first
times. Why
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:05 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:41:27 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
The next
big change is likely to be virtualizing openrc so that it can be
uninstalled, and possibly not including it in the stage3, but that
hasn't really even
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
there is *no we* in nix unless your or I step up.
Fair enough! ::
git clone --bare https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gli.gitCloning into bare
repository 'gli.git'...
fatal: repository 'https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gli.git/' not found
It'd be
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 07:41:27PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
So, I don't know if that makes you more or less worried, but nothing
has really changed in the last year on the systemd front. The next
big change is likely to be virtualizing openrc so that it can be
uninstalled, and possibly
2015-08-08 11:02 GMT-06:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
Gentoo doesn't hide it, it merely clears the screen once the boot has
completed successfully. If the boot halts, you can see where and,
usually, why it stopped. Try that with openUbundora.
Most splash screens I've seen, can change
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 08 Aug 2015 18:02:00 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:00:29 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Yep, I find it infuriating that by default all distros seem to go to
great effort to hide as much
Neil Bothwick composed on 2015-08-08 18:02 (UTC+0100):
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:00:29 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Yep, I find it infuriating that by default all distros seem to go to
great effort to hide as much information about the boot/startup
process as possible. WTF? Do they think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/08/2015 01:37 PM, James wrote:
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
there is *no we* in nix unless your or I step up. Fair enough!
::
git clone --bare https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gli.gitCloning
into bare repository
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Poison BL. poiso...@gmail.com wrote:
So it was prompted by a perceived security issue, but I would happily sit
down with any of the DPOs involved in that to hear just how that little
bandaid fixes any of the real security issues involved ;)
--
Joshua M.
Am 08.08.2015 um 19:05 schrieb walt:
I just noticed that net-misc/netifrc installs two systemd service files,
which puzzled me. Is this in preparation for virtualizing openrc?
This is to provide systemd users with the corresponding service files
like OpenRC users get the necessary init
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
I think this should actually be handled by USE=-systemd, and not by
INSTALL_MASK.
This was the subject of extensive discussion and a council decision.
The rationale for not configuring the installing of small files via a
Am 08.08.2015 um 21:30 schrieb Rich Freeman:
This was the subject of extensive discussion and a council decision.
The rationale for not configuring the installing of small files via a
USE flag is that it would greatly increase the number of packages that
would depend on that flag, and then
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am 08.08.2015 um 21:30 schrieb Rich Freeman:
This was the subject of extensive discussion and a council decision.
The rationale for not configuring the installing of small files via a
USE flag is that it would greatly
On 08/08/2015 22:02, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am 08.08.2015 um 21:30 schrieb Rich Freeman:
This was the subject of extensive discussion and a council decision.
The rationale for not configuring the installing of small files
On Saturday, August 08, 2015 2:26:50 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 08/08/2015 14:23, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 05:13:06 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
To remove safely now you should run:
emerge --deselect dev-haskell/hostname
followed by:
emerge --depclean
That will
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 08/08/2015 22:02, Rich Freeman wrote:
It is recommended that users not set an INSTALL_MASK, so you won't
have to rebuild anything if you don't do that. If you care that much
about inodes I'd probably get rid of /usr/portage before
/usr/lib/systemd. :)
On the other
On Saturday, August 08, 2015 6:28:00 PM Mick wrote:
On Saturday 08 Aug 2015 18:02:00 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:00:29 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Yep, I find it infuriating that by default all distros seem to go to
great effort to hide as much information about the
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 15:21:07 -0400
Poison BL. poiso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Poison BL. poiso...@gmail.com wrote:
So it was prompted by a perceived security issue, but I would
happily sit down with any of the DPOs involved in that to hear just
how that little
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 12:21:12 -0600, Jc García wrote:
Gentoo doesn't hide it, it merely clears the screen once the boot has
completed successfully. If the boot halts, you can see where and,
usually, why it stopped. Try that with openUbundora.
Most splash screens I've seen, can change back
Jonathan Callen jcallen at gentoo.org writes:
Until Sven updates his code to not use GuideXML, I have linked to his
snapshots in my own devspace, under
http://dev.gentoo.org/~jcallen/snapshots/.
The snapshots go back to 2008-01-20, and are current to 2015-07-20.
downloading now.
thx
James
37 matches
Mail list logo
