On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 12:17:51PM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > > > 2. USB port is not supported by kernel
> > > > I'm not sure what you mean. Is there any option I should enable for
> > > > genkernel? I read on the Wiki page that
> > > It works with Arch, are you using the same kernel options
On 07/10/2015 21:42, brettrse...@gmail.com wrote:
> YyyyYYuIU
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
Hmm, interesting reply. I'm wondering if it has something to
do with:
1. verizon
2. dodgy 3g
3. crapberry. oops, sorry: blackberry
Or maybe it's because y, u and i are in a
Hi. I am getting some kind of kernel panick in 4.2.1 -- it boots up OK,
to a virtual console with a framebuffer, but after half a minute or so,
I get the kernel panick -- now nothing is preserved in the logs, so how
do I get any information about what happened -- serial console or other
means?
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
> > Hi. I am getting some kind of kernel panick in 4.2.1 -- it boots up OK,
> > ...
> > how
> > do I get any information about what happened -- serial console or other
> > means? Can I do a
On Wednesday 07 Oct 2015 14:23:39 James wrote:
> Mick gmail.com> writes:
> > > http://gentoo-en.vfose.ru
> > > /wiki/IptablesIptables_and_stateful_firewalls#State_basics
> >
> > Start iptables, run the script, stop iptables with '/etc/init.d/iptables
> > >
>
> stop' which will save your rules
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
> Hi. I am getting some kind of kernel panick in 4.2.1 -- it boots up OK,
> ...
> how
> do I get any information about what happened -- serial console or other
> means? Can I do a console over the network without additional
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:34 PM, wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using gentoo-sources, I will
>> > sync and try again, maybe go to 4.1
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:34 PM, wrote:
> > Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote:
> >
> > Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using gentoo-sources, I will
> > sync and try again, maybe go to 4.1 and see what happens. I heard 3.19
> > was the first version where btrfs
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote:
>
> Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using gentoo-sources, I will
> sync and try again, maybe go to 4.1 and see what happens. I heard 3.19
> was the first version where btrfs actually worked, and I have 3.18 here,
> this is
YyyyYYuIU
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Alan McKinnon
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:39:42
To:
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] strange TCP timeout errors
On
On Tuesday, October 06, 2015 11:03:04 PM João Miguel wrote:
> > > > Possible causes:
> > > > 1. USB stick doesn't work as boot device
> >
> > Ok, so scratch that one.
>
> Okay, done.
>
> > > > 2. USB port is not supported by kernel
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what you mean. Is there any option I
Ralf writes:
> I have some issues building an armv7a toolchain using crossdev.
You'll find much more expertise on the gentoo embedded IRC channel
for these sorts of issues and in depth expertise on the arm platforms.
hth,
James
>>> I've attached a PNG from Munin showing the TCP timeout errors on my
>>> Gentoo server over the past month. The data is expressed in timeouts
>>> per second and that rate is shown to be steadily increasing over the
>>> past month. That seems strange to me. Munin doesn't show any other
>>>
Mick gmail.com> writes:
> > http://gentoo-en.vfose.ru
> > /wiki/IptablesIptables_and_stateful_firewalls#State_basics
> Start iptables, run the script, stop iptables with '/etc/init.d/iptables >
stop' which will save your rules to /var/lib/iptables/rules-save,
after starting iptables, I ran
On 07/10/2015 14:58, Grant wrote:
I've attached a PNG from Munin showing the TCP timeout errors on my
Gentoo server over the past month. The data is expressed in timeouts
per second and that rate is shown to be steadily increasing over the
past month. That seems strange to
On 07/10/2015 18:27, Grant wrote:
> I have to chown munin:nginx and chmod g+x on directory /run/munin/
> after every reboot. The munin list suggests altering the initscript
> but is there a better way?
There are ways, but I wouldn't call them better.
/run is often a tmpfs so the dir has to be
Folks,
I do not want gmail or any other big (brother) organization email.
I just need a simple pop3 (small) email box, in case my
(underconstruction) email server is not happy. Low traffic.
Temporary is fine too.
Suggestions most welcome.
Tia,
James
> I've attached a PNG from Munin showing the TCP timeout errors on my
> Gentoo server over the past month. The data is expressed in timeouts
> per second and that rate is shown to be steadily increasing over the
> past month. That seems strange to me. Munin doesn't show any
I have to chown munin:nginx and chmod g+x on directory /run/munin/
after every reboot. The munin list suggests altering the initscript
but is there a better way?
- Grant
On 07/10/2015 17:55, Grant wrote:
>> I've attached a PNG from Munin showing the TCP timeout errors on my
>> Gentoo server over the past month. The data is expressed in timeouts
>> per second and that rate is shown to be steadily increasing over the
>> past month. That seems
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:14 PM, James wrote:
>
> #!/bin/bash
> # A basic stateful firewall for a workstation or laptop that isn't running any
> # network services like a web server, SMTP server, ftp server, etc.
>
> if [ "$1" = "start" ]
> then
> echo "Starting
On 6 October 2015 at 22:14, James wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I just ran across this page:
>
> http://gentoo-en.vfose.ru/wiki/Iptables/Iptables_and_stateful_firewalls#State_basics
>
> It has a basic firewall using iptables.
> Not bad for a generic firewall on a openrc
wrote:
> James wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > I do not want gmail or any other big (brother) organization email.
> > I just need a simple pop3 (small) email box, in case my
> > (underconstruction) email server is not happy. Low traffic.
> > Temporary
James wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I do not want gmail or any other big (brother) organization email.
> I just need a simple pop3 (small) email box, in case my
> (underconstruction) email server is not happy. Low traffic.
> Temporary is fine too.
>
> Suggestions most welcome.
25 matches
Mail list logo