Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

2015-11-16 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 03:48:52 -0600, Dale wrote: > > According to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565694 it has > > been fixed, I synced too early this morning to pick that up. > I synced again just a hour or two ago and I must have missed it too. It > spit out the same error as before.

[gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

2015-11-16 Thread Martin Vaeth
cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > I have thinmanifests=true as specified in some news item or post, I > think this was a mandatory change some time ago using rsync. If you really use rsync/webrsync and not git, this is unlikely: The file containing this line

Re: [gentoo-user] Problems while updateing screen (tool not monitor)

2015-11-16 Thread Meino . Cramer
Zhu Sha Zang [15-11-16 17:00]: > You can't. Please report a bug correctly: bugs.gentoo.org. > > Regards > > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 04:13:54 +0100 > meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > > Stroller [15-11-16 03:24]: > > > > > > > On Sun, 15

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

2015-11-16 Thread Marc Joliet
On Monday 16 November 2015 17:21:07 Martin Vaeth wrote: >cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: >> I have thinmanifests=true as specified in some news item or post, I >> think this was a mandatory change some time ago using rsync. > >If you really use rsync/webrsync and not git, this

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

2015-11-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Marc Joliet wrote: > > Don't forget that in Gentoo all commits are also GPG signed. > Sure, but to be fair those signatures are only bound to the content of the commit by an sha1 hash. -- Rich

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

2015-11-16 Thread Dale
Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-11-15, Dale wrote: > >> Wasn't there a emerge option to ignore the manifest? I seem to recall >> there used to be one but it was a LONG time ago. Of course, if someone >> has tinkered with something that would be a bad thing to do. > If the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

2015-11-16 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 17:39:29 -0800, walt wrote: > > >> I hope the gentoo devs will fix this bug before you have a chance to >> test my advice :) > According to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565694 it has been > fixed, I synced too early this morning to pick that

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

2015-11-16 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 17:39:29 -0800, walt wrote: > > I have the same wrong size recorded in the Manifest! > > No idea why portage didn't yell at me - there seems > > to be another bug involved... > > I did the same thing today (15 Nov) and it succeeded. > > However, I ran the ebuild command on

Re: [gentoo-user] Problems while updateing screen (tool not monitor)

2015-11-16 Thread Zhu Sha Zang
You can't. Please report a bug correctly: bugs.gentoo.org. Regards On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 04:13:54 +0100 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Stroller [15-11-16 03:24]: > > > > > On Sun, 15 November 2015, at 4:33 a.m., meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > > > > > screen

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

2015-11-16 Thread Marc Joliet
On Monday 16 November 2015 17:32:56 Rich Freeman wrote: >On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Marc Joliet wrote: >> Don't forget that in Gentoo all commits are also GPG signed. > >Sure, but to be fair those signatures are only bound to the content of >the commit by an sha1 hash. Ah!