Re: [gentoo-user] Anybody got a Gentoo system working under uclibc?

On 04/28/2016 06:07 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:33:01AM -0500, Corbin wrote Questions ... if you will permit : Are you saying that in "make.conf" you set INPUT_DEVICES="evdev" and did a test compile run? The emerge you tried ... was it "xorg-base/xorg-x11"?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Failed to emerge dev-qt/qtwebkit-5.6.0

walt wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:50:41 -0500 > Dale wrote: > >> Dale wrote: >>> Howdy, >>> >>> Doing some updates and ran into this. Anyone else having this >>> problem? I can post more info if needed but thought this would get >>> it off to a start. >>> >>> >>> >>>

[gentoo-user] Re: Failed to emerge dev-qt/qtwebkit-5.6.0

On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:50:41 -0500 Dale wrote: > Dale wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > Doing some updates and ran into this. Anyone else having this > > problem? I can post more info if needed but thought this would get > > it off to a start. > > > > > > > > <<< SNIP >>> > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Anybody got a Gentoo system working under uclibc?

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:33:01AM -0500, Corbin wrote > > > Questions ... if you will permit : > > Are you saying that in "make.conf" you set INPUT_DEVICES="evdev" and did > a test compile run? > The emerge you tried ... was it "xorg-base/xorg-x11"? > Or did you try a meta package for a

Re: [gentoo-user] Failed to emerge dev-qt/qtwebkit-5.6.0

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:44:34AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote > proc/proc procdefaults0 0 > shm /dev/shmtmpfs nodev,nosuid0 0 > > Not sure about those last two - are they still needed nowadays? I'm running OK without

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: freeSwitch

On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:32:37 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: > > I take it the other 10% was rounding errors? ;-) > > Covered by NDA. ;) Non-Decimal Addition? -- Neil Bothwick The trouble with the world is that everybody in it is three drinks behind. pgp1D1SobOlWt.pgp Description: OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: freeSwitch

On Thursday, April 28, 2016 08:24:47 PM Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:38:12 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: > > To be clear, 80% of my grievances with FreeSwitch have to do with the > > nature of their configuration and documentation. 9% had to do with a > > weird issue wherin we wound

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: freeSwitch

On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:38:12 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: > To be clear, 80% of my grievances with FreeSwitch have to do with the > nature of their configuration and documentation. 9% had to do with a > weird issue wherin we wound up rebooting the VM containing FS on a > schedule; none of my

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: freeSwitch

On Thursday, April 28, 2016 04:06:50 PM James wrote: > Michael Mol gmail.com> writes: > > Bah. So you guys aren't going to let me get away with trash-talking > > without > > some accountability of details. OK. I'll let you know when I've written up > > something; I've already emailed one person a

[gentoo-user] Re: Anybody got a Gentoo system working under uclibc?

Corbin charter.net> writes: > If a hard dependency link between Xorg server -> xf86-input-keyboard > exists, this will never work. I have no idea at this point if this is > true. What I have been reading suggests that the xf86-input keyboard and > mouse libs are being phased out. > With

[gentoo-user] Re: freeSwitch

Michael Mol gmail.com> writes: > Bah. So you guys aren't going to let me get away with trash-talking without > some accountability of details. OK. I'll let you know when I've written up > something; I've already emailed one person a handful of my complaints in > bullet form. But that'd need

Re: [gentoo-user] ATLAS@home and VirtualBox

On Wednesday 27 Apr 2016 10:03:58 I wrote: --->8 > I've just noticed that the files under ~/.VirtualBox are all 0600; I wonder > if that's thet problem: that the boinc user can't read them. But then > boinc is running as me, the owner of all the files involved. Nope. After setting files to 0644

Re: [gentoo-user] Anybody got a Gentoo system working under uclibc?

On 04/27/2016 10:16 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 07:30:12PM -0500, Corbin wrote Your Welcome. Link for "evdev" : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evdev The default kernel config has "evdev" built into the kernel. On my desktop, Nvidia drivers do look for and use

Re: [gentoo-user] freeSwitch

On Thursday, April 28, 2016 04:26:31 AM J. Roeleveld wrote: > On April 28, 2016 12:48:36 AM GMT+02:00, "Max R.D. Parmer" wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 27, 2016, at 15:17, Stroller wrote: > >> > On Wed, 27 April 2016, at 3:21 pm, Michael Mol > > > >wrote: > >> > ...

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Bluetooth PIM sync with KDE?

On Thursday, April 28, 2016 10:32:58 AM J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 01:14:01 PM Michael Mol wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 04:09:33 PM James wrote: > > > Michael Mol gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > But it's *great* to see you post to the list, again. I peruse your > >

[gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrade from 4.1.12 to 4.4.6 hangs without writing logs.

On 27/04/16 21:33, J. Roeleveld wrote: On April 27, 2016 12:59:18 PM GMT+02:00, Hans wrote: Tried to upgrade the kernels of my desktop and notebook fron kernel 4.1.12 upgrade to 4.4.6. Both systems freeze during booting with 4.4.6. No dmsg, No messages logs. Previous kernel

Re: [gentoo-user] Failed to emerge dev-qt/qtwebkit-5.6.0

On Wednesday 27 Apr 2016 17:52:07 Dale wrote: > I seem to recall glibc being one of those packages that you can't > downgrade. Sort of chicken to upgrade, just in case the problem gets > even worse. You could back your system partitions up first, to have a system to revert to if necessary. I've

Re: [gentoo-user] Bluetooth PIM sync with KDE?

On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 01:59:18 PM Michael Mol wrote: > Is it still possible to sync, e.g. the contacts on my phone with Kontact? > Googling around, it seems like OpenSync isn't really even a thing any more, > and I'm not finding anything in various account settings in Kontact to add > a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Bluetooth PIM sync with KDE?

On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 01:14:01 PM Michael Mol wrote: > On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 04:09:33 PM James wrote: > > Michael Mol gmail.com> writes: > > But it's *great* to see you post to the list, again. I peruse your install > > script (github) on occasion to see if you have updated it, or