Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Konsole

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:47 AM, konsolebox wrote: >> However, if I try to update @world, it still wants to drag in a bunch of >> kde5 crap. > > You have to mask packages. > > `USE='-wayland' emerge -pvet kde-apps/kde-meta` shows this mask works. > (Just for testing. Don't

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Konsole

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Daniel Frey wrote: > On 07/11/2016 06:06 PM, Daniel Frey wrote: >> I would think that if eshowkw is picking up things in the kde-sunset >> overlay it would be indicated in the repo column? >> >> However, I don't see any kde4 packages. Maybe

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Konsole

On 07/11/2016 06:06 PM, Daniel Frey wrote: > I would think that if eshowkw is picking up things in the kde-sunset > overlay it would be indicated in the repo column? > > However, I don't see any kde4 packages. Maybe they're still moving them > over? > > Dan > > > I really shouldn't try

[gentoo-user] executing a command as a nologin user

.procmailrc :0 c * !^X-Loop: n...@example.com | formail -X "From:" | $HOME/bin/script.sh procmail.log procmail: Executing " formail -X "From:" | $HOME/bin/script.sh for incoming mail, a script is executed. logfile has the same entry as it is in other users. but the script do nothing. How

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

El lun, 11-07-2016 a las 20:47 -0400, waltd...@waltdnes.org escribió: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:48:37AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote > > > so it is not turned on on x86. Not sure about amd64. IIRC it is > > default > > on amd64, but I am not sure and too lazy to google. Just like the > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Konsole

On 07/11/2016 02:44 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Daniel, > > Please clarify what you mean by "doesn't seem to show anything from the > kde-sunset overlay", preferably with config files and output of suitable > emerge commands. > > Alan > Note: I was assuming kde4 was put into the sunset overlay.

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:48:37AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote > so it is not turned on on x86. Not sure about amd64. IIRC it is default > on amd64, but I am not sure and too lazy to google. Just like the thread > starter. Actually, I did Google. So did another particpant in the Pale

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

Am 11.07.2016 um 22:51 schrieb J. García: > El lun, 11-07-2016 a las 16:27 -0400, waltd...@waltdnes.org escribió: >> I put it into CFLAGS/CCFLAGS years ago, and left it there. During >> a >> discussion on the Pale Moon forum about build options, the opinion >> seems >> to be that

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Wireless DHCP takes over resolv.conf

On Monday 11 Jul 2016 23:50:48 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 11/07/2016 23:03, Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2016-07-11, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> On 11/07/2016 22:29, Grant Edwards wrote: > >>> On 2016-07-11, Alan McKinnon wrote: > why don't you

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Wireless DHCP takes over resolv.conf

On 11/07/2016 23:03, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2016-07-11, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 11/07/2016 22:29, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2016-07-11, Alan McKinnon wrote: why don't you go with the dns server addresses supplied by each network's dhcp?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Konsole

On 11/07/2016 23:05, konsolebox wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 11/07/2016 22:07, konsolebox wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Daniel Frey wrote: Thanks, that led me to sync the kde-sunset overlay. However,

Re: [gentoo-user] Update blocked by kdebase-startkde:4

2016-07-09 8:52 GMT-05:00 Robin Atwood : > Attempting to update/world this weekend I get: > > > > > > # emerge -uDv @world > > > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > > > Calculating dependencies... done! > > > > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Konsole

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 11/07/2016 22:07, konsolebox wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Daniel Frey wrote: >>> >>> Thanks, that led me to sync the kde-sunset overlay. However, I think I >>> am missing a

[gentoo-user] Re: Wireless DHCP takes over resolv.conf

On 2016-07-11, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 11/07/2016 22:29, Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2016-07-11, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >>> why don't you go with the dns server addresses supplied by each >>> network's dhcp? Presumably the admin put them their

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

El lun, 11-07-2016 a las 16:27 -0400, waltd...@waltdnes.org escribió: >   I put it into CFLAGS/CCFLAGS years ago, and left it there.  During > a > discussion on the Pale Moon forum about build options, the opinion > seems > to be that "-fomit-frame-pointer" is now the default.  Is that > correct?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Konsole

On 11/07/2016 22:07, konsolebox wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Daniel Frey wrote: Thanks, that led me to sync the kde-sunset overlay. However, I think I am missing a step as when I use emerge or eshowkw it doesn't seem to show anything from the kde-sunset overlay.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Wireless DHCP takes over resolv.conf

On 11/07/2016 22:29, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2016-07-11, Alan McKinnon wrote: why don't you go with the dns server addresses supplied by each network's dhcp? Presumably the admin put them their because they work on that network. One might think that, but I find it

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

On 07/11/2016 04:27 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: I put it into CFLAGS/CCFLAGS years ago, and left it there. During a discussion on the Pale Moon forum about build options, the opinion seems to be that "-fomit-frame-pointer" is now the default. Is that correct? I'd like to simplify my

[gentoo-user] Re: Wireless DHCP takes over resolv.conf

On 2016-07-11, Alan McKinnon wrote: > why don't you go with the dns server addresses supplied by each > network's dhcp? Presumably the admin put them their because they > work on that network. One might think that, but I find it often not to be the case. I can recall

[gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

I put it into CFLAGS/CCFLAGS years ago, and left it there. During a discussion on the Pale Moon forum about build options, the opinion seems to be that "-fomit-frame-pointer" is now the default. Is that correct? I'd like to simplify my CFLAGS/CCFLAGS both in Gentoo and the Pale Moon build

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Konsole

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 11/07/2016 02:46, Daniel Frey wrote: >> On 07/10/2016 01:27 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> >>> It's an overlay, not an Attic. Enable the overlay with layman. >>> > Or, maybe I have the name wrong. > It is correct.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Konsole

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Daniel Frey wrote: > Thanks, that led me to sync the kde-sunset overlay. However, I think I > am missing a step as when I use emerge or eshowkw it doesn't seem to > show anything from the kde-sunset overlay. layman usually handled this > stuff,

Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless DHCP takes over resolv.conf

On 11/07/2016 20:13, Mick wrote: On Monday 11 Jul 2016 17:31:29 Alan McKinnon wrote: On 11/07/2016 10:32, Emanuele Rusconi wrote: Wouldn't it be better to just use the same servers for both wired and wireless? It's what I use and it works flawlessly. It works flawlessly *for you*, but by no

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Konsole

On 07/10/2016 09:38 PM, konsolebox wrote: > > So that confirms it. It's not in layman. > > You can add a `repos.conf` file like this. See portage(5) for it. > > [kde-sunset] > auto-sync = yes > location = /var/local/overlays/kde-sunset > masters = gentoo > sync-type = git > sync-uri =

Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless DHCP takes over resolv.conf

On Monday 11 Jul 2016 17:31:29 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 11/07/2016 10:32, Emanuele Rusconi wrote: > > Wouldn't it be better to just use the same servers for both wired and > > wireless? It's what I use and it works flawlessly. > > It works flawlessly *for you*, but by no means can you consider

Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless DHCP takes over resolv.conf

On 11/07/2016 10:32, Emanuele Rusconi wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to just use the same servers for both wired and > wireless? It's what I use and it works flawlessly. It works flawlessly *for you*, but by no means can you consider it correct or stable. There is no guarantee that a wired and

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Konsole

On 11/07/2016 02:46, Daniel Frey wrote: > On 07/10/2016 01:27 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >> It's an overlay, not an Attic. Enable the overlay with layman. >> >> A single kde-4 ebuild is useless without the rest of KDE it depends on. >> > > I just tried this and layman says the overlay doesn't

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Update blocked by kdebase-startkde:4

On Sunday 10 July 2016 12:22:32 I wrote: > I've had no trouble with stability, only with ugliness. ...most of which I've eliminated by using the Oxygen theme, Deja Vu sans typeface and the 1,1 strut values I mentioned in another message. However, there is one remaining problem (well, most

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Update blocked by kdebase-startkde:4

Daniel Frey wrote: > On 07/09/2016 07:08 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> Thanks Dan. I tried your package.mask and thought I was getting >> somewhere. But I had to add these to package.use (I have USE=-qt5 in >> make.conf): >> >> sys-auth/polkit-qt qt5 >> dev-libs/libdbusmenu-qt

Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless DHCP takes over resolv.conf

Wouldn't it be better to just use the same servers for both wired and wireless? It's what I use and it works flawlessly. In that case you have at least a couple of options: The second line says: # /etc/resolv.conf.head can replace this line So, you can just put your preferred servers in the