[gentoo-user] Re: executing a command as a nologin user

On 07/14/2016 05:19 PM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > On 07/13/2016 01:41 PM, wabe wrote: >> Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> On 07/13/2016 07:10 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 12/07/2016 03:47, jens w wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-user] executing a command as a nologin user

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/13/2016 01:41 PM, wabe wrote: > Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 07/13/2016 07:10 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 12/07/2016 03:47, jens w wrote:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage getting slicker?

On Thursday 14 July 2016 14:43:54 Gevisz wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:52:41 +0200 Marc Joliet wrote: > > On Thursday 14 July 2016 08:17:19 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > -N is newuse, portage also considers packages whose USE has changed. > > > -t is emptytree, portage also

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE 5

On Friday 15 Jul 2016 02:03:09 Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 14/07/16 08:04, Mick wrote: > For the missing icons, is this inside a Plasma session? What's the > output of "env | grep XDG_"? No, I am not running the full Plasma desktop - although I had tried this on a PC with the Plasma desktop

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage getting slicker?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/13/2016 05:41 PM, James wrote: > Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > >> >> On 13/07/2016 20:25, James wrote: >>> So, today I ran a sync and upgrade to a gentoo workstation:: >>> emerge -uvDNp world >>> >>> These are the packages that

[gentoo-user] Re: Firefox 45.2.0 segfaulting

On 2016-07-14, Grant Edwards wrote: > www-client/firefox got updated this morning to 45.2.0, and now it segfaults > whenever you enter a character in the search field or the URL field. Same behavior with 47.0.1. Starting 47 in "safe mode" avoids the problem, but

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 45.2.0 segfaulting

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > www-client/firefox got updated this morning to 45.2.0, and now it segfaults > whenever you enter a character in the search field or the URL field. > > Anybody else see this sort of behavior? > > -- > Grant Edwards

[gentoo-user] Firefox 45.2.0 segfaulting

www-client/firefox got updated this morning to 45.2.0, and now it segfaults whenever you enter a character in the search field or the URL field. Anybody else see this sort of behavior? -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! over in west at

[gentoo-user] Re: KDE 5

On 14/07/16 08:04, Mick wrote: >> For missing icons and network places, it would be nice to know >> more. > > Please see attached screenshot. The menu has no icons, only text. > Configuration options are limited compared to KDE4. Delete, instead of Move > to > Trash, is not configurable.

[gentoo-user] Re: Portage getting slicker?

Franz Fellner gmail.com> writes: > > Sorry for the interrupting a big gurus, but in my humble opinion > > the reason why there was no compilation while running emerge for > > the first time is the -p option (pretend). > No, even without -p the first command wouldn't have done anything,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage getting slicker?

On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:43:54 +0300, Gevisz wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:52:41 +0200 Marc Joliet wrote: > > > On Thursday 14 July 2016 08:17:19 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > -N is newuse, portage also considers packages whose USE has changed. > > > -t is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage getting slicker?

On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:52:41 +0200 Marc Joliet wrote: > On Thursday 14 July 2016 08:17:19 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > -N is newuse, portage also considers packages whose USE has changed. > > -t is emptytree, portage also considers the entire tree and -u tells it > > to not remerge

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage getting slicker?

On Thursday 14 July 2016 08:17:19 Alan McKinnon wrote: > -N is newuse, portage also considers packages whose USE has changed. > -t is emptytree, portage also considers the entire tree and -u tells it > to not remerge things that don't need updating. Um, -e is --emptytree, no? -t is just --tree.

Re: [gentoo-user] Using SSH around the LAN

On Wednesday 13 Jul 2016 18:23:56 Mick wrote: > Something else to think about is to only allow the login shell to execute > limited command(s), for example to only be able to su to portage and run > rsync or some such. Hmm... -- Rgds Peter

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage getting slicker?

On 14/07/2016 04:03, James wrote: >> It's unsurprising you got different behaviour > true, but the -u was in both and a complete different set of > packages was considered, by portage, and only one was able to > move forward (note the -p was not in the second entry, despite > my not including