Re: [gentoo-user] Is there a reason why LLVM/Clang ebuilds don't support "mutislot"?

This also makes it difficult to use GHC's LLVM backend, since its compatible versions usually lag behind the current one.

[gentoo-user] Is there a reason why LLVM/Clang ebuilds don't support "mutislot"?

Other distros like Ubuntu support the installation of multiple versions of LLVM/Clang side by side. One of the things Clang is really good at is support for the most recently approved upcoming features of the C++17 standard. The best support for testing such features is with the latest

Re: [gentoo-user] USB crucial file recovery

On August 29, 2016 3:24:18 AM GMT+02:00, Grant wrote: >>> I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup >>> elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open >>> the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that >NTFS

Re: [gentoo-user] USB crucial file recovery

>> I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup >> elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open >> the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that NTFS >> was the best solution. >> >> I decided to copy a 10GB file from a USB hard

Re: [gentoo-user] USB crucial file recovery

On Sunday 28 Aug 2016 11:49:44 Grant wrote: > I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup > elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open > the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that NTFS > was the best solution. > > I decided

Re: [gentoo-user] USB crucial file recovery

On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:49:44 -0700, Grant wrote: > I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup > elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open > the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that NTFS > was the best solution. If it's

[gentoo-user] USB crucial file recovery

I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that NTFS was the best solution. I decided to copy a 10GB file from a USB hard disk directly to

Re: [gentoo-user] removal of bopm before hopm is in tree

>From the dev mailing list: # Pacho Ramos (21 Aug 2016) # Dead for a long time in favour of hopm, bug #473754. # Removal in a month. net-misc/bopm On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 08/25/2016 07:29 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote: > > I

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI booting

On Sunday 28 Aug 2016 10:26:15 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: --->8 > > ... part of the output of "bootctl status": > > > > Boot Loader Binaries: > > ESP: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI booting

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday 28 Aug 2016 10:55:56 Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 10:43:17 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> > I'd still like to know where the directory /usr/lib64/systemd/boot/efi >> > came from though. >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI booting

On Sunday 28 Aug 2016 10:55:56 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 10:43:17 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I'd still like to know where the directory /usr/lib64/systemd/boot/efi > > came from though. > > Surely it's from systemd-boot, it is installed by systemd here. What does > qfile

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI booting

On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 10:43:17 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I'd still like to know where the directory /usr/lib64/systemd/boot/efi > came from though. Surely it's from systemd-boot, it is installed by systemd here. What does qfile tell you? $ qfile /usr/lib/systemd/boot/efi -- Neil Bothwick

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI booting

On Friday 26 Aug 2016 16:13:53 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > In my search for a suitable boot method, I'm trying Mike G's > > systemd-boot > > ebuild. I've installed it with no problem, and now I reach the heart-in- > >

Re: [gentoo-user] removal of bopm before hopm is in tree

On 08/25/2016 07:29 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote: > I still use bopm, and it built fine last time I emerged it. > > If hopm isn't in the tree yet, why was bopm still pmasked for removal? > > Reason for asking is I'm curious about removal procedures. I was under > the impression that replacement