On 12/23/2016 08:58 AM, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> On 161223-05:38+0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
>> It took me all of my skills ;-) . But I installed Pale Moon
> ...
>> That's new technology. EAPI=6 in the ebuild
>> Nothing I've seen in my previous 7 years as Gentoo
> ...
>> I'd like to provide detailed
lee wrote:
>
> So the names will not change when rebooting and are to be expected to
> possibly change at any time.
/at any time/when you open the computer and mess around with the hardware/
Your whining in many postings becomes meanwhile unbearable.
Just face the facts:
Unless somebody comes up
lee wrote:
> Dale writes:
>
>> lee wrote:
>>> Dale writes:
>>>
>>> I didn't go look at boards I had around here. I went to a major
>>> computer supplier, newegg, and looked at what they had. Go back and
>>> read again what I did and maybe read it more carefully.
>>>
>>> Might I also add, it's
Original message From: lee Date: 24/12/2016
03:07 (GMT+01:00) To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]
from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No
Tom H writes:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
>>
>> It is
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 04:15:50 +0100, lee wrote:
>
>> > There are no config files to edit with the predictable names, the
>> > names are created from the physical location of the port. That's why
>> > they are called predictable,
>>
>> I only know what the names are when
Dale writes:
> lee wrote:
>> Dale writes:
>>
>> I didn't go look at boards I had around here. I went to a major
>> computer supplier, newegg, and looked at what they had. Go back and
>> read again what I did and maybe read it more carefully.
>>
>> Might I also add, it's more than just me that
Tom H writes:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
>>
>> It is even more frustrating that these so-called predictable network
>> names actually can change on a reboot, it's happened to me more than
>> once when multiple network cards are detected in a different order.
>
>>From K
Tom H writes:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 04:15:50 +0100, lee wrote:
>>>
>>> The perceived advantage lies in being able to refer to network ports
>>> in a more reliable way, and I don't see how using unrecognisable
>>> names instead of recognisa
On 161223-05:38+0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> It took me all of my skills ;-) . But I installed Pale Moon
...
> That's new technology. EAPI=6 in the ebuild
> Nothing I've seen in my previous 7 years as Gentoo
...
> I'd like to provide detailed info here how the above happened
Maybe start from the
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:26:05 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>
>>
>> It's the best thing that the systemd developers have produced!
>
> Except they didn't produce it. They assimilated gummiboot, which I was
> already using, into the systemd collective!
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:26:05 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> > I don't use grub on UEFI systems, but I use the systemd bootloader,
> > so I thought I'd keep quiet about that ;-)
>
> I'm also a heretic who uses the systemd bootloader no matter what pid1
> is in charge.
>
> It's the best thing that the sy
11 matches
Mail list logo
