> I went back to GCC 4.9.3 & the pkg merged without any problem.
>
> What are other users' experiences using GCC 5.4.0 ?
>
~amd64 users have been using it for ages, with no problems. I have one
system that seems to need me to run ldconfig when i update gcc, but the
others are fine.
On 04/22/2017 10:45 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
> I've been following the thread re GCC 5.4.0 & after 'eix-sync' installed it.
> There's a news item warning that there's a new ABI
> & it mb necessary to run 'revdep-rebuild' if it fails with a linking error.
>
> The first pkg I tried to compile with 5.4
On April 23, 2017 7:48:27 AM GMT+02:00, "J. Roeleveld"
wrote:
>On April 21, 2017 6:37:46 PM GMT+02:00, "Arthur Țițeică"
> wrote:
>>În ziua de vineri, 21 aprilie 2017, la 12:34:13 EEST, Mick a scris:
>>> I've updated dolphin to kde-apps/dolphin-16.12.3 and elog advised
>me:
>>>
>>> * Messages for
On April 21, 2017 6:37:46 PM GMT+02:00, "Arthur Țițeică"
wrote:
>În ziua de vineri, 21 aprilie 2017, la 12:34:13 EEST, Mick a scris:
>> I've updated dolphin to kde-apps/dolphin-16.12.3 and elog advised me:
>>
>> * Messages for package kde-apps/dolphin-16.12.3:
>>
>> * For crypto actions, pleas
I've been following the thread re GCC 5.4.0 & after 'eix-sync' installed it.
There's a news item warning that there's a new ABI
& it mb necessary to run 'revdep-rebuild' if it fails with a linking error.
The first pkg I tried to compile with 5.4.0 indeed failed at that point,
so I followed the adv
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:51:56PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 22/04/2017 12:47, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > Hello group,
> >
> > after years of reading of other people’s dependency stupefications here, it
> > is finally my turn. Looking over the output of emerge --depclean after a
> > world
>
> Thanks. I suppose it's just a gcc thing, then. I just emerged
> gcc-5.4.0 and the output is the same, though.
>
My skylake comes up as broadwell too, with gcc 5.4
Looks like gcc 6 has a skylake arch, but not a kabylake.
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-6.3.0/gcc/x86-Options.html#x86-Options
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Poison BL. wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
> While I don't have anything that new handy, the 6MB cache checks out against
> intel's specs for the i5-7600. The broadwell i5-5675 lists off at a 4MB
> cache (not including the eDRAM).
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
> I have a new computer, assembled piece by piece, and the cpu is
> supposed to be an intel i5-7600 LGA1151. The original box says "7th
> generation".
>
> However:
>
> $ gcc -### -E - -march=native 2>&1 | sed -r '/cc1/!d;s/(")|(^.* - )//g'
>
I have a new computer, assembled piece by piece, and the cpu is
supposed to be an intel i5-7600 LGA1151. The original box says "7th
generation".
However:
$ gcc -### -E - -march=native 2>&1 | sed -r '/cc1/!d;s/(")|(^.* - )//g'
-march=broadwell -mmmx -mno-3dnow -msse -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3
-mno-sse
On 22/04/2017 12:47, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> after years of reading of other people’s dependency stupefications here, it
> is finally my turn. Looking over the output of emerge --depclean after a
> world update, I found that portage wants to remove my X11 video driver. o.O
> F
Hello group,
after years of reading of other people’s dependency stupefications here, it
is finally my turn. Looking over the output of emerge --depclean after a
world update, I found that portage wants to remove my X11 video driver. o.O
From my point of view, it should not want to do so, because
On Saturday 22 Apr 2017 00:45:31 Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 22 Apr 2017 00:08:25 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Friday 21 Apr 2017 13:39:52 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > I was referring to the situation where you use the DHCP server to give
> > > out pseudo-static addresses. I have always used addresses
13 matches
Mail list logo
