Re: [gentoo-user] Loading a Firmware Module By hand?

On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:11:20 + Hunter Jozwiak wrote: On 12/17/17, Andrey Utkin wrote: On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:34:14AM -0500, Hunter Jozwiak wrote: Hi, I have an ath10k_pci device that I'm trying to get hooked to the Internet, but I'm

Re: [gentoo-user] Loading a Firmware Module By hand?

Hmm. I have kernel 4.14.7 and linux-firmware 20171206. I tried version 9 as well, but that didn't help matters, either. Nor did compiling the firmware into the kernel; either 4.14 is too old, or it is too new. I tried copying the firmware my live iso was using, but that didn't help either.

Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > I've been running Linux systems since 1994, calling my private LAN mynet > (bowdlerised). Now I come to install neth server on one machine, it insists > that I tell it a domain name with at least two

[gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network

Hello list, I've been running Linux systems since 1994, calling my private LAN mynet (bowdlerised). Now I come to install neth server on one machine, it insists that I tell it a domain name with at least two dots in it. But I don't have a standard TLD. What do you all call your local LANs?

Re: [gentoo-user] cross compiling arm with 17 profiles.

Hello, On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > On P, 2017-12-17 at 16:50 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote: >> Something I cant figure out: >> >> ARM is still on the 13 profiles - should an amd64 system used to >> cross >> compile for arm (Raspberry Pi's) be left on

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again, emerge -e @world related questions...

On 12/17/2017 06:45 AM, Melleus wrote: > After some digging in the files I commented out v3.4 line in > /etc/python-exec/python-exec.conf by hand and eselect then begins to > work as I expect. The question is that I think that I should not edit > that file by hand. So is it a bug or might I done

Re: [gentoo-user] Canary Pies

On 12/16/2017 10:43 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > Hi, > > Currently I am scanning directories of my system with checksec to > identify relevant files of haveing "No PIE" or "No canary found" set. > > Is there any technical reason for which such files cannot be compiled > in a way so they have

Re: [gentoo-user] cross compiling arm with 17 profiles.

On P, 2017-12-17 at 16:50 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > Something I cant figure out: > > ARM is still on the 13 profiles - should an amd64 system used to > cross > compile for arm (Raspberry Pi's) be left on the 13 profiles or 17 > will > work fine? ARM profiles are delayed to potentially fix

[gentoo-user] Re: Again, emerge -e @world related questions...

Michael Orlitzky writes: > On 12/08/2017 09:53 AM, Melleus wrote: >> I had moved to v 17.0 profile mostly painless, though it was a time >> consuming event. But I got one point anyway. Python in my system was >> updated from 3.4 to 3.5 and after 3.4 was removed with depclean,

Re: [gentoo-user] Loading a Firmware Module By hand?

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:34:14AM -0500, Hunter Jozwiak wrote: > Hi, > > I have an ath10k_pci device that I'm trying to get hooked to the > Internet, but I'm having some strange issues. It is trying to load the > 2.1 firmware, but I don't think that is the proper firmware for the > interface to

Re: [gentoo-user] Loading a Firmware Module By hand?

On Sunday, 17 December 2017 05:34:14 GMT Hunter Jozwiak wrote: > Hi, > > I have an ath10k_pci device that I'm trying to get hooked to the > Internet, but I'm having some strange issues. It is trying to load the > 2.1 firmware, but I don't think that is the proper firmware for the > interface to

[gentoo-user] cross compiling arm with 17 profiles.

Something I cant figure out: ARM is still on the 13 profiles - should an amd64 system used to cross compile for arm (Raspberry Pi's) be left on the 13 profiles or 17 will work fine? BillK