On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:43:13 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> After installing python 3.6, I now have multiple systems wanting to
> depclean it! Have I missed something? Should I be uninstalling 3.4 and
> 3.5 which are also present?
>
> bunyip ~ # eselect python list
> Available Python
On 28/06/18 06:16, John Covici wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:04:57 -0400,
> Ralph Seichter wrote:
>> On 27.06.18 22:43, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>>
>>> After installing python 3.6, I now have multiple systems wanting to
>>> depclean it! Have I missed something? Should I be uninstalling 3.4
>>> and
On 28.06.18 00:16, John Covici wrote:
> after doing a world update, there are still packages which apparently
> need both 3.4 and 3.5, so I cannot remove them.
That sounds like you might still have some packages where the use flags
python_targets_python3_4 and/or python_targets_python3_5 are
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:04:57 -0400,
Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
> On 27.06.18 22:43, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>
> > After installing python 3.6, I now have multiple systems wanting to
> > depclean it! Have I missed something? Should I be uninstalling 3.4
> > and 3.5 which are also present?
>
> After
On 27.06.18 22:43, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> After installing python 3.6, I now have multiple systems wanting to
> depclean it! Have I missed something? Should I be uninstalling 3.4
> and 3.5 which are also present?
After you have recompiled all packages that were built with Python 3.4
and 3.5
After installing python 3.6, I now have multiple systems wanting to
depclean it! Have I missed something? Should I be uninstalling 3.4 and
3.5 which are also present?
bunyip ~ # eselect python list
Available Python interpreters, in order of preference:
[1] python3.6
[2] python3.5
[3]
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:51 AM Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>
> I think its more complex than just falling behind - anything later gets
> the spectre fixes etc. and it appears not to be quite stable yet in some
> cases.
This may have been your intent and I might be misreading your email,
but I just
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:41 PM Philip Webb wrote:
>
> 180626 Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:58 PM Philip Webb wrote:
> >> Does anyone know why the latest stable version of Gentoo-sources is 4.9.xx
> >> ?
> >> I installed 4.9.16 , which I continue to use, on 2017-04-06 .
>
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 09:23:55 +0100, Mick wrote:
> I had to revert to gentoo-sources-4.9.95 because on a Dell-XPS all
> kernels on the 4.14, 4.15, 4.16 series broke bluetooth and suspend to
> RAM.
I have an XPS and have run all those versions, now on 4.17.2, and have
had no problems with suspend
On Wednesday, 27 June 2018 06:51:50 BST Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> I think its more complex than just falling behind - anything later gets
> the spectre fixes etc. and it appears not to be quite stable yet in some
> cases. I am on 4.9.95 for everything except a surface pro4 with 4.16.17
> (as stable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
No Idea anybody why python is so slow on Gentoo compared to Debian?
No Idea how to solve this?
Regards
Klaus
- --
Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16Klaus Ethgen
11 matches
Mail list logo