Re: [gentoo-user] Set the alias of an interface with netifrc
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 1:29:48 AM CET Alarig Le Lay wrote: > On sam. 19 janv. 16:45:42 2019, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > Not sure if that is actually "supported" by netifrc. > > You could add these commands in a postup() block. > > I did that, thanks! > > > Is there a specific benefit for just setting an "alias" like this? > > Yes, knowing what each interface is used for. That's why I rename the interfaces. That works in all tools and also makes the config easier. -- Joost
Re: [gentoo-user] Missing file so DIE; Seriously?!?!?!?
On January 24, 2019 6:25:48 AM Alan Grimes wrote: 99.999% sure this is not my fault yet my build gets killed dead by it, no "Okay, let's see what other things we can build", just DIE!!! Have you tried --keep-going? ## Verifying ebuild manifests !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/dev-python/pygments/files/pygments-2.2.0-sphinx17.patch !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/dev-lang/ruby/files/2.4/012-openssl_1.1.patch !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/dev-lang/ruby/files/2.4/012-openssl_1.1.patch !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/dev-lang/ruby/files/2.4/012-openssl_1.1.patch !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/app-text/libetonyek/files/libetonyek-0.1.8-no-parentheses.patch !!! A file is not listed in the Manifest: '/usr/portage/kde-apps/kde-dev-utils/files/kde-dev-utils-18.04.3-ki18n-5.48.patch' !!! A file is not listed in the Manifest: '/usr/portage/kde-apps/kwrite/files/kwrite-18.04.3-root-user.patch' !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/media-video/obs-studio/files/obs-studio-22.0.3-fdk-build-fix.patch ### Trying to mask ruby-2.4 now... =\ ## Total: 1626 packages (427 upgrades, 34 new, 6 in new slots, 1159 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 12,018 KiB Fetch Restriction: 2 packages The following mask changes are necessary to proceed: (see "package.unmask" in the portage(5) man page for more details) # required by dev-ruby/kpeg-1.1.0-r1::gentoo[ruby_targets_ruby24] # required by dev-ruby/rdoc-6.1.1::gentoo[ruby_targets_ruby26] # required by dev-lang/ruby-2.5.3::gentoo[rdoc] # required by dev-vcs/subversion-1.11.1::gentoo[ruby] # required by app-portage/layman-2.4.2-r2::gentoo[subversion] # required by @selected # required by @world (argument) # /etc/portage/package.mask: #broken, pre-release package so don't really care =dev-lang/ruby-2.4.5-r1 NOTE: The --autounmask-keep-masks option will prevent emerge from creating package.unmask or ** keyword changes. Use --autounmask-write to write changes to config files (honoring CONFIG_PROTECT). Carefully examine the list of proposed changes, paying special attention to mask or keyword changes that may expose experimental or unstable packages. tortoise /usr/portage/dev-lang/ruby # 3 I literally have NO IDEA where ruby_targets_ruby24 is being defined, I am installing 23, 25, and 26 with a default of 26... PAIN!!! -- Please report bounces from this address to a...@numentics.com Powers are not rights.
[gentoo-user] Missing file so DIE; Seriously?!?!?!?
99.999% sure this is not my fault yet my build gets killed dead by it, no "Okay, let's see what other things we can build", just DIE!!! ## >>> Verifying ebuild manifests !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/dev-python/pygments/files/pygments-2.2.0-sphinx17.patch !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/dev-lang/ruby/files/2.4/012-openssl_1.1.patch !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/dev-lang/ruby/files/2.4/012-openssl_1.1.patch !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/dev-lang/ruby/files/2.4/012-openssl_1.1.patch !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/app-text/libetonyek/files/libetonyek-0.1.8-no-parentheses.patch !!! A file is not listed in the Manifest: '/usr/portage/kde-apps/kde-dev-utils/files/kde-dev-utils-18.04.3-ki18n-5.48.patch' !!! A file is not listed in the Manifest: '/usr/portage/kde-apps/kwrite/files/kwrite-18.04.3-root-user.patch' !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: /usr/portage/media-video/obs-studio/files/obs-studio-22.0.3-fdk-build-fix.patch ### Trying to mask ruby-2.4 now... =\ ## Total: 1626 packages (427 upgrades, 34 new, 6 in new slots, 1159 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 12,018 KiB Fetch Restriction: 2 packages The following mask changes are necessary to proceed: (see "package.unmask" in the portage(5) man page for more details) # required by dev-ruby/kpeg-1.1.0-r1::gentoo[ruby_targets_ruby24] # required by dev-ruby/rdoc-6.1.1::gentoo[ruby_targets_ruby26] # required by dev-lang/ruby-2.5.3::gentoo[rdoc] # required by dev-vcs/subversion-1.11.1::gentoo[ruby] # required by app-portage/layman-2.4.2-r2::gentoo[subversion] # required by @selected # required by @world (argument) # /etc/portage/package.mask: #broken, pre-release package so don't really care =dev-lang/ruby-2.4.5-r1 NOTE: The --autounmask-keep-masks option will prevent emerge from creating package.unmask or ** keyword changes. Use --autounmask-write to write changes to config files (honoring CONFIG_PROTECT). Carefully examine the list of proposed changes, paying special attention to mask or keyword changes that may expose experimental or unstable packages. tortoise /usr/portage/dev-lang/ruby # 3 I literally have NO IDEA where ruby_targets_ruby24 is being defined, I am installing 23, 25, and 26 with a default of 26... PAIN!!! -- Please report bounces from this address to a...@numentics.com Powers are not rights.
Re: [gentoo-user] OT scripting - strip zero if between period and digit
Hello, On Wed, 23 Jan 2019, Adam Carter wrote: >> $ printf '0.1.2.3 01.2.3.4 1.2.3.0 1.2.000.3\n' | \ >> sed 's/0*\([[:digit:]]\+\)/\1/g' >> 0.1.2.3 1.2.3.4 1.2.3.0 1.2.0.3 > >So [[:digit:]] is another way of writing [0-9] and the + just means another >instance of the proceeding expression, right, so your and Francois >solutions are functionally the same, and all the following are the same >too, right? Not quite. [[:digit:]]+ == [0-9][0-9]* Not too, that [:digit:] respects locale. Don't know where locale applies though. Probably Devanagari or such. I just made myself to use classes rather than char-ranges. See man 7 regex for more classes. HTH, -dnh -- "UNIX was not designed to stop people from doing stupid things, because that would also stop them from doing clever things." -- Doug Gwyn
[gentoo-user] Worst ideas in history:
Top 3 bad ideas of all time: 1. Hitler picking a fight with Stalin. 2. Messing with /usr/lib, /usr/lib32, and /usr/lib64 which had not caused me a single issue since the scheme was introduced. (17.0 is broken under ~amd64) 3. Putting 320 people on a baloon filled with Hydrogen and sending it to New Jersey. I'm rebuilding my system after an 80 day rest because my video card threw a glitch on the other monitor, a group of pixels it does not update. PAIN PAIN PAIN!!! wtf is up with linux_headers 4.20; kernels after 4.18.x are radioactive and will cause illness if death after prolonged exposure. =( I need headers for 4.18 so it will probably work... (Version 4.17 is the one that held up for 80+ days, finally installing 4.18 now..) -- Please report bounces from this address to a...@numentics.com Powers are not rights.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT scripting - strip zero if between period and digit
On 1/23/19 2:24 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: This is not a good application for a regex. Since that doesn't seem to be stopping anyone, here's my entry. sed 's/\(0*\(255\|254\|253\|252\|251\|250\|249\|248\|247\|246\|245\|244\|243\|242\|241\|240\|239\|238\|237\|236\|235\|234\|233\|232\|231\|230\|229\|228\|227\|226\|225\|224\|223\|222\|221\|220\|219\|218\|217\|216\|215\|214\|213\|212\|211\|210\|209\|208\|207\|206\|205\|204\|203\|202\|201\|200\|199\|198\|197\|196\|195\|194\|193\|192\|191\|190\|189\|188\|187\|186\|185\|184\|183\|182\|181\|180\|179\|178\|177\|176\|175\|174\|173\|172\|171\|170\|169\|168\|167\|166\|165\|164\|163\|162\|161\|160\|159\|158\|157\|156\|155\|154\|153\|152\|151\|150\|149\|148\|147\|146\|145\|144\|143\|142\|141\|140\|139\|138\|137\|136\|135\|134\|133\|132\|131\|130\|129\|128\|127\|126\|125\|124\|123\|122\|121\|120\|119\|118\|117\|116\|115\|114\|113\|112\|111\|110\|109\|108\|107\|106\|105\|104\|103\|102\|101\|100\|99\|98\|97\|96\|95\|94\|93\|92\|91\|90\|89\|88\|87\|86\|85\|84\|83\|82\|81\|80\|79\|78\|77\|76\|75\|74\|73\|72\|71\|70\|69\|68\|67\|66\|65\|64\|63\|62\|61\|60\|59\|58\|57\|56\|55\|54\|53\|52\|51\|50\|49\|48\|47\|46\|45\|44\|43\|42\|41\|40\|39\|38\|37\|36\|35\|34\|33\|32\|31\|30\|29\|28\|27\|26\|25\|24\|23\|22\|21\|20\|19\|18\|17\|16\|15\|14\|13\|12\|11\|10\|9\|8\|7\|6\|5\|4\|3\|2\|1\|0\)\.0*\(255\|254\|253\|252\|251\|250\|249\|248\|247\|246\|245\|244\|243\|242\|241\|240\|239\|238\|237\|236\|235\|234\|233\|232\|231\|230\|229\|228\|227\|226\|225\|224\|223\|222\|221\|220\|219\|218\|217\|216\|215\|214\|213\|212\|211\|210\|209\|208\|207\|206\|205\|204\|203\|202\|201\|200\|199\|198\|197\|196\|195\|194\|193\|192\|191\|190\|189\|188\|187\|186\|185\|184\|183\|182\|181\|180\|179\|178\|177\|176\|175\|174\|173\|172\|171\|170\|169\|168\|167\|166\|165\|164\|163\|162\|161\|160\|159\|158\|157\|156\|155\|154\|153\|152\|151\|150\|149\|148\|147\|146\|145\|144\|143\|142\|141\|140\|139\|138\|137\|136\|135\|134\|133\|132\|131\|130\|129\|128\|127\|126\|125\|124\|123\|122\|121\|120\|119\|118\|117\|116\|115\|114\|113\|112\|111\|110\|109\|108\|107\|106\|105\|104\|103\|102\|101\|100\|99\|98\|97\|96\|95\|94\|93\|92\|91\|90\|89\|88\|87\|86\|85\|84\|83\|82\|81\|80\|79\|78\|77\|76\|75\|74\|73\|72\|71\|70\|69\|68\|67\|66\|65\|64\|63\|62\|61\|60\|59\|58\|57\|56\|55\|54\|53\|52\|51\|50\|49\|48\|47\|46\|45\|44\|43\|42\|41\|40\|39\|38\|37\|36\|35\|34\|33\|32\|31\|30\|29\|28\|27\|26\|25\|24\|23\|22\|21\|20\|19\|18\|17\|16\|15\|14\|13\|12\|11\|10\|9\|8\|7\|6\|5\|4\|3\|2\|1\|0\)\.0*\(255\|254\|253\|252\|251\|250\|249\|248\|247\|246\|245\|244\|243\|242\|241\|240\|239\|238\|237\|236\|235\|234\|233\|232\|231\|230\|229\|228\|227\|226\|225\|224\|223\|222\|221\|220\|219\|218\|217\|216\|215\|214\|213\|212\|211\|210\|209\|208\|207\|206\|205\|204\|203\|202\|201\|200\|199\|198\|197\|196\|195\|194\|193\|192\|191\|190\|189\|188\|187\|186\|185\|184\|183\|182\|181\|180\|179\|178\|177\|176\|175\|174\|173\|172\|171\|170\|169\|168\|167\|166\|165\|164\|163\|162\|161\|160\|159\|158\|157\|156\|155\|154\|153\|152\|151\|150\|149\|148\|147\|146\|145\|144\|143\|142\|141\|140\|139\|138\|137\|136\|135\|134\|133\|132\|131\|130\|129\|128\|127\|126\|125\|124\|123\|122\|121\|120\|119\|118\|117\|116\|115\|114\|113\|112\|111\|110\|109\|108\|107\|106\|105\|104\|103\|102\|101\|100\|99\|98\|97\|96\|95\|94\|93\|92\|91\|90\|89\|88\|87\|86\|85\|84\|83\|82\|81\|80\|79\|78\|77\|76\|75\|74\|73\|72\|71\|70\|69\|68\|67\|66\|65\|64\|63\|62\|61\|60\|59\|58\|57\|56\|55\|54\|53\|52\|51\|50\|49\|48\|47\|46\|45\|44\|43\|42\|41\|40\|39\|38\|37\|36\|35\|34\|33\|32\|31\|30\|29\|28\|27\|26\|25\|24\|23\|22\|21\|20\|19\|18\|17\|16\|15\|14\|13\|12\|11\|10\|9\|8\|7\|6\|5\|4\|3\|2\|1\|0\)\.0*\(255\|254\|253\|252\|251\|250\|249\|248\|247\|246\|245\|244\|243\|242\|241\|240\|239\|238\|237\|236\|235\|234\|233\|232\|231\|230\|229\|228\|227\|226\|225\|224\|223\|222\|221\|220\|219\|218\|217\|216\|215\|214\|213\|212\|211\|210\|209\|208\|207\|206\|205\|204\|203\|202\|201\|200\|199\|198\|197\|196\|195\|194\|193\|192\|191\|190\|189\|188\|187\|186\|185\|184\|183\|182\|181\|180\|179\|178\|177\|176\|175\|174\|173\|172\|171\|170\|169\|168\|167\|166\|165\|164\|163\|162\|161\|160\|159\|158\|157\|156\|155\|154\|153\|152\|151\|150\|149\|148\|147\|146\|145\|144\|143\|142\|141\|140\|139\|138\|137\|136\|135\|134\|133\|132\|131\|130\|129\|128\|127\|126\|125\|124\|123\|122\|121\|120\|119\|118\|117\|116\|115\|114\|113\|112\|111\|110\|109\|108\|107\|106\|105\|104\|103\|102\|101\|100\|99\|98\|97\|96\|95\|94\|93\|92\|91\|90\|89\|88\|87\|86\|85\|84\|83\|82\|81\|80\|79\|78\|77\|76\|75\|74\|73\|72\|71\|70\|69\|68\|67\|66\|65\|64\|63\|62\|61\|60\|59\|58\|57\|56\|55\|54\|53\|52\|51\|50\|49\|48\|47\|46\|45\|44\|43\|42\|41\|40\|39\|38\|37\|36\|35\|34\|33\|32\|31\|30\|29\|28\|27\|26\|25\|24\|23\|22\|21\|20\|19\|18\|17\|16\|15\|14\|13\|12\|11\|10\|9\|8\|7\|6\|5\|4\|3\|2\|1\|0\)\)/\2.\3.\4.\5/g'
[gentoo-user] Re: OT scripting - strip zero if between period and digit
On 2019-01-23, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:41 PM Grant Edwards > wrote: >> On 2019-01-23, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >> >> > This any better? :-) >> > >> > echo '198.088.0.01 >> > 198.088.062.01 >> > 198.088.0.001' | sed -r 's/\.0+([^.0]+)/.\1/g' >> >> I guess it's 'better', but it's still broken: >> >> $ echo '003.4.5.6' | sed -r 's/\.0+([^.0]+)/.\1/g' >> 003.4.5.6 >> >> This is not a good application for a regex. > > The OP stated that there were no leading zeros in the first octet of > the IP address, so that case did not need to be handled. If I had a dollar for every bug/failure that happened because somebody relied on an input restriction like that... -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! You mean you don't at want to watch WRESTLING gmail.comfrom ATLANTA?
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT scripting - strip zero if between period and digit
On 1/23/19 3:08 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: The OP stated that there were no leading zeros in the first octet of the IP address, so that case did not need to be handled. $ echo "1.00.3.4" | sed -r 's/\.0+([^.0]+)/.\1/g' 1.00.3.4
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT scripting - strip zero if between period and digit
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:41 PM Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2019-01-23, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > > This any better? :-) > > > > echo '198.088.0.01 > > 198.088.062.01 > > 198.088.0.001' | sed -r 's/\.0+([^.0]+)/.\1/g' > > I guess it's 'better', but it's still broken: > > $ echo '003.4.5.6' | sed -r 's/\.0+([^.0]+)/.\1/g' > 003.4.5.6 > > This is not a good application for a regex. > > -- > Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I have accepted > at Provolone into my life! > gmail.com > > The OP stated that there were no leading zeros in the first octet of the IP address, so that case did not need to be handled.
[gentoo-user] Re: OT scripting - strip zero if between period and digit
On 2019-01-23, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > This any better? :-) > > echo '198.088.0.01 > 198.088.062.01 > 198.088.0.001' | sed -r 's/\.0+([^.0]+)/.\1/g' I guess it's 'better', but it's still broken: $ echo '003.4.5.6' | sed -r 's/\.0+([^.0]+)/.\1/g' 003.4.5.6 This is not a good application for a regex. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I have accepted at Provolone into my life! gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT scripting - strip zero if between period and digit
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 4:10 PM Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2019-01-23, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > > > How about this one? > > > > echo '198.088.0.01 > > 198.088.062.01' | sed 's/\.0\([0-9][0-9]*\)/.\1/g' > > 198.88.0.1 > > 198.88.62.1 > > Also no. > > $ echo 198.088.0.001 | sed 's/\.0\([0-9][0-9]*\)/.\1/g' > 198.88.0.01 > > > -- > Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Hello. Just walk > at along and try NOT to think > gmail.comabout your INTESTINES being >almost FORTY YARDS LONG!! > > This any better? :-) echo '198.088.0.01 198.088.062.01 198.088.0.001' | sed -r 's/\.0+([^.0]+)/.\1/g' 198.88.0.1 198.88.62.1 198.88.0.1
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT scripting - strip zero if between period and digit
On 2019-01-23 18:26, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:09:45 - (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > How about this one? > > echo '198.088.0.01 > 198.088.062.01' | sed 's/\.0\([0-9][0-9]*\)/.\1/g' > 198.88.0.1 > 198.88.62.1 Also no. $ echo 198.088.0.001 | sed 's/\.0\([0-9][0-9]*\)/.\1/g' 198.88.0.01 This is like playing Whack-a-Mole with sed ;-) That's the fun ;-) I think the truth is in the middle between a twelve-pages-script and a one-liner. Split it, 'sed' it, check result, correct result if required, combine it. -- Sent with eQmail-1.11 beta - a fork of djb's famous qmail
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT scripting - strip zero if between period and digit
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:09:45 - (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > > How about this one? > > > > echo '198.088.0.01 > > 198.088.062.01' | sed 's/\.0\([0-9][0-9]*\)/.\1/g' > > 198.88.0.1 > > 198.88.62.1 > > Also no. > > $ echo 198.088.0.001 | sed 's/\.0\([0-9][0-9]*\)/.\1/g' > 198.88.0.01 This is like playing Whack-a-Mole with sed ;-) -- Neil Bothwick I know corn oil comes from corn, where does baby oil come from? pgpVmxUInKN3A.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-user] Re: OT scripting - strip zero if between period and digit
On 2019-01-23, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > How about this one? > > echo '198.088.0.01 > 198.088.062.01' | sed 's/\.0\([0-9][0-9]*\)/.\1/g' > 198.88.0.1 > 198.88.62.1 Also no. $ echo 198.088.0.001 | sed 's/\.0\([0-9][0-9]*\)/.\1/g' 198.88.0.01 -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Hello. Just walk at along and try NOT to think gmail.comabout your INTESTINES being almost FORTY YARDS LONG!!
Re: [gentoo-user] OT scripting - strip zero if between period and digit
On 1/23/19 5:52 AM, Wols Lists wrote: I've just done a bit of digging, and would this work to match an octet? [0-9][0-9]?[0-9]? It doesn't match 0123. Regardless, using [0-9] is destined to fail because it will match things like 999 that also aren't an octet.
Re: [gentoo-user] OT scripting - strip zero if between period and digit
On 23/01/19 07:37, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:05 AM Paul Colquhoun > wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, 23 January 2019 5:52:57 PM AEDT Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 5:20 AM Adam Carter wrote: >> François-Xavier > > My bad, it should be: > > sed 's/0*\([0-9][0-9]*\)/\1/g' > > (tests are indeed needed!) Many thanks François. This is almost right, but it is also stripping zeros that follow a letter, and I only want it to strip zeros that are proceeded by a period. There are no leading zeros in the first octet of the IP so that case does not need to be handled. Does the \1 refer to what's in the ()'s? So anything that one would wont to carry through should be inside the ()'s and anything that's outside is stripped, right? >>> Would something like to do the trick? >>> echo 198.088.062.01 | sed 's/\.0/./g' >>> 198.88.62.1 >> >> In a word, no. >> >> echo 198.088.0.01 | sed 's/\.0/./g' >> 198.88..1 >> >> >> -- >> Reverend Paul Colquhoun, ULC. http://andor.dropbear.id.au/ >> Asking for technical help in newsgroups? Read this first: >> http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#intro >> >> >> >> > > How about this one? > > echo '198.088.0.01 > 198.088.062.01' | sed 's/\.0\([0-9][0-9]*\)/.\1/g' > 198.88.0.1 > 198.88.62.1 > I've just done a bit of digging, and would this work to match an octet? [0-9][0-9]?[0-9]? I know ? normally matches a single character, but apparently in this syntax it means "0 or 1 occurrence of the preceding expression". So that will detect a number consisting of at most three digits. I thought there must be a "detect a single optional character" operator ... :-) Cheers, Wol
