On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 06:33:58PM -0500, Andrew Udvare wrote:
> The first machine is on a 17.1 profile, and migration was relatively
> simple, and worked. I did it based on this post:
>
> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-8373904.html?sid=5c30f451df89c01a6bbe0a8dadd77c36#8373904
I'm
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:48:40PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> The portage ebuild has some code that automatically patches
> /usr/share/portage/config/make.globals for existing installs. You can
> update the setting there.
Ah, I didn't look there in my search :).
Cool, thanks much for the
On 14/01/2020 17:05, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I recently installed a new server, and noticed that it is using
> /var/cache/distfiles rather than /usr/portage/distfiles. looking at the
> documentation, it seems that is the new default, and it says "new
> installations" will use it. I have older
Am 14.01.20 um 13:15 schrieb Jens Pelzetter:
since some weeks ago I have a problem with Thunderbird/Lightning. In the
dialogs for tasks or events I can't input or change dialog. Clicking on
the buttons to show the calendar does nothing. If I try the edit an
using the keyboard the date it reset
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 5:05 PM Paul B. Henson wrote:
>
> I recently installed a new server, and noticed that it is using
> /var/cache/distfiles rather than /usr/portage/distfiles. looking at the
> documentation, it seems that is the new default, and it says "new
> installations" will use it. I
I recently installed a new server, and noticed that it is using
/var/cache/distfiles rather than /usr/portage/distfiles. looking at the
documentation, it seems that is the new default, and it says "new
installations" will use it. I have older servers which are still using
On 2020-01-13 11:09, Alan Grimes wrote:
> mysqld goes into infinite hang when I try to boot my damn manchine.
Missing entropy? Try installing haveged.
--
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 15:47:51 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > sent 2.71M bytes received 218.79M bytes 56.02K bytes/sec
>
> HOW long?! 56KB/s shows something going badly wrong.
This sounds like it could be a network problem. Have you used
mirrorselect?
> > total size is 208.96M speedup is
On Tuesday, 14 January 2020 13:39:57 GMT you wrote:
> On 1/13/20 5:24 PM, (Nuno Silva) wrote:
> > On 2020-01-13, james wrote:
> >> On 1/13/20 11:32 AM, gentoo-user+ow...@lists.gentoo.org wrote:
> >>> Some messages to you could not be delivered. If you're seeing this
> >>> message it means things
I guess you're referring to this:
"The use of emerge-webrsync is recommended for those who are behind restrictive
firewalls (because it uses HTTP/FTP protocols for downloading the snapshot) and
saves network bandwidth. Readers who have no network or bandwidth restrictions
can happily skip down
On 1/13/20 5:24 PM, (Nuno Silva) wrote:
On 2020-01-13, james wrote:
On 1/13/20 11:32 AM, gentoo-user+ow...@lists.gentoo.org wrote:
Some messages to you could not be delivered. If you're seeing this
message it means things are back to normal, and it's merely for your
information.
Here is the
On Tuesday, 14 January 2020 11:07:34 GMT n952162 wrote:
> On 2020-01-14 11:10, Peter Humphrey wrote:
--->8
> >> This is a fresh install from a minimal cd image. I'm starting out with
> >> mkfs. I've tried that 3 times, twice using a stage 3 from 2020/01/08
> >> and once using a stage 3 from
n952162 wrote:
> On 2020-01-14 11:10, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 14 January 2020 09:37:24 GMT n952162 wrote:
>>> On 2020-01-14 09:44, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 09:04:13 +0100, n952162 wrote:
> It sounds to me like the repository is broken - having ownership
>
Hello everyone,
since some weeks ago I have a problem with Thunderbird/Lightning. In the
dialogs for tasks or events I can't input or change dialog. Clicking on
the buttons to show the calendar does nothing. If I try the edit an
using the keyboard the date it reset to the previous value once the
On 2020-01-14 11:10, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 January 2020 09:37:24 GMT n952162 wrote:
On 2020-01-14 09:44, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 09:04:13 +0100, n952162 wrote:
It sounds to me like the repository is broken - having ownership as root
seems to be slightly more
On Tuesday, 14 January 2020 09:37:24 GMT n952162 wrote:
> On 2020-01-14 09:44, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 09:04:13 +0100, n952162 wrote:
> >> It sounds to me like the repository is broken - having ownership as root
> >> seems to be slightly more entropy than portage and could
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:37:24 +0100, n952162 wrote:
> > Have you tried completely removing your portage tree and reinstating
> > it with webrsync?
> I've always used emerge --sync rather than webrsync because I always
> like to use the smallest hammer possible. But if you say I should use
>
On 2020-01-14 09:44, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 09:04:13 +0100, n952162 wrote:
It sounds to me like the repository is broken - having ownership as root
seems to be slightly more entropy than portage and could have happened
as a unintended consequence of some uncarefully completed
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 09:04:13 +0100, n952162 wrote:
> It sounds to me like the repository is broken - having ownership as root
> seems to be slightly more entropy than portage and could have happened
> as a unintended consequence of some uncarefully completed operation.
If the repository was
On 2020-01-14 00:16, Mick wrote:
On Monday, 13 January 2020 22:40:14 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:15:31 +, Mick wrote:
According to my emerge --info output I have sandbox, usersandbox and
userpriv, all set. The owner of my portage directory and all files
therein is
On 2020-01-13 23:42, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 12:37:11 +0100, n952162 wrote:
The portage tree is sync'ed to the portage tree mirrors. A newer fs
snapshot won't include the tree itself, but it will include the new
default fs locations for the portage directory.
Not sure what
21 matches
Mail list logo
