Re: [gentoo-user] could there be a problem with acct-group/lp?

2020-12-30 Thread n952162
On 12/31/20 1:29 AM, Michael wrote: On Wednesday, 30 December 2020 23:33:47 GMT Jack wrote: On 2020.12.30 17:17, n952162 wrote: When I try to restore my pkgs, after the --depclean, the emerge fails. It seems like there's an error in the pre-inst script of acct-group/lp? That's need by cups:

Re: [gentoo-user] could there be a problem with acct-group/lp?

2020-12-30 Thread n952162
On 12/31/20 12:33 AM, Jack wrote: On 2020.12.30 17:17, n952162 wrote: When I try to restore my pkgs, after the --depclean, the emerge fails. It seems like there's an error in the pre-inst script of acct-group/lp? That's need by cups: 1270~/adm/gentoo/emerged>sudo cat

Re: [gentoo-user] could there be a problem with acct-group/lp?

2020-12-30 Thread Michael
On Wednesday, 30 December 2020 23:33:47 GMT Jack wrote: > On 2020.12.30 17:17, n952162 wrote: > > When I try to restore my pkgs, after the --depclean, the emerge > > fails. > > It seems like there's an error in the pre-inst script of > > acct-group/lp? > > That's need by cups: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] could there be a problem with acct-group/lp?

2020-12-30 Thread Jack
On 2020.12.30 17:17, n952162 wrote: When I try to restore my pkgs, after the --depclean, the emerge fails.  It seems like there's an error in the pre-inst script of acct-group/lp?  That's need by cups: 1270~/adm/gentoo/emerged>sudo cat /var/tmp/portage/acct-group/lp-0-r1/temp/build.log  *

[gentoo-user] could there be a problem with acct-group/lp?

2020-12-30 Thread n952162
When I try to restore my pkgs, after the --depclean, the emerge fails.  It seems like there's an error in the pre-inst script of acct-group/lp?  That's need by cups: 1270~/adm/gentoo/emerged>sudo cat /var/tmp/portage/acct-group/lp-0-r1/temp/build.log  * Package:    acct-group/lp-0-r1  *

[gentoo-user] x2goserver - very slow

2020-12-30 Thread thelma
The current x2goserver-4.1.0.2 is very, very slow. I am still runing older x2goserver-4.0.1.22 and the speed is OK but the current one 4.1.0.2 is very slow over local LAN regardless of the setting I use.

Re: [gentoo-user] x2go server - Connection failed. /usr/lib64/x2go/x2gocheckport: line 131: DBD::SQLite::db:

2020-12-30 Thread thelma
On 12/30/2020 02:10 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I just installed x2goserver-4.1.0.2 (fuse sqlite -postgres) and I'm > getting an error trying to connect to the server: I've missed the find print: x2godbadmin --createdb

[gentoo-user] x2go server - Connection failed. /usr/lib64/x2go/x2gocheckport: line 131: DBD::SQLite::db:

2020-12-30 Thread thelma
I just installed x2goserver-4.1.0.2 (fuse sqlite -postgres) and I'm getting an error trying to connect to the server: Connection failed. /usr/lib64/x2go/x2gocheckport: line 131: DBD::SQLite::db: syntax error in expression (error token is "::SQLite::db") /usr/lib64/x2go/x2gocheckport: line 131:

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses; I think I wrecked my fresh install

2020-12-30 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Mittwoch, 30. Dezember 2020, 20:01:32 EET schrieb antlists: > On 30/12/2020 17:30, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > That's true, though registrars are filtering for it now. Also, I just > > checked, e.g. firefox always builds with unicode support (it would have > > trouble with a lot of websites

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses; I think I wrecked my fresh install

2020-12-30 Thread antlists
On 30/12/2020 17:30, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: That's true, though registrars are filtering for it now. Also, I just checked, e.g. firefox always builds with unicode support (it would have trouble with a lot of websites otherwise). (: ˙˙˙ǝpoɔᴉun sǝop oslɐ ʇuǝᴉlɔ lᴉɐɯ ɹnoʎ uǝɥʇ ¿sᴉɥʇ pɐǝɹ noʎ

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses; I think I wrecked my fresh install

2020-12-30 Thread antlists
On 30/12/2020 16:35, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: I don't know if this has improved over the years, but my initial experience with unicode was rather negative. The fact that text files were twice as large wasn't a major problem in itself. The real showstopper was that importing text files into

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses; I think I wrecked my fresh install

2020-12-30 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> On top of that Cyrillic letters like "m", "i", "c", and "o" are > considered different from their English equivalants. Security experts > showed proof-of-cocept attacks where clicking on "microsoft.com" can > take you to a hostile domain (queue the jokes). That's true, though registrars

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses; I think I wrecked my fresh install

2020-12-30 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> I don't know if this has improved over the years, but my initial > experience with unicode was rather negative. The fact that text > files were twice as large wasn't a major problem in itself. The > real showstopper was that importing text files into spreadsheets > and text-editors and word

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

2020-12-30 Thread n952162
On 12/30/20 9:35 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 08:46, n952162 wrote: Well, yes, the current version, indeed requires python3_8. The version that was installed on my system, however, to be updated, listed python3_7 in the PYTHON_TARGETS section. That was the only difference

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

2020-12-30 Thread Michael
On Wednesday, 30 December 2020 07:22:34 GMT n952162 wrote: > On 12/30/20 1:05 AM, Michael wrote: > > On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 22:55:03 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 23:16:11 +0100, n952162 wrote: > So, I tried to do an emerge on @system. I got another slot conflict! >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses; I think I wrecked my fresh install

2020-12-30 Thread Wols Lists
On 30/12/20 01:04, Grant Edwards wrote: > You must be talking about some sort of weird "wide" encoding (is there > such a thing as UTF-16?). I've never seen a file like that. Everybody > and everything uses UTF-8 these days and has for years. UTF-8 is a > superset of ASCII, and doesn't increase

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

2020-12-30 Thread Arve Barsnes
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 08:46, n952162 wrote: > Well, yes, the current version, indeed requires python3_8. The version > that was installed on my system, however, to be updated, listed > python3_7 in the PYTHON_TARGETS section. That was the only difference > between the two packages in the