[gentoo-user] Re: mailing list problem: changing subscription type

2022-05-29 Thread Robin H. Johnson
(Replying as listowner, but I'm also on the nomail version of gentoo-user, please CC to gentoo-user+ow...@lists.gentoo.org or to me directly for most mail) On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 07:35:20AM +0530, Madhu wrote: > I had subscribed to gentoo-user on 2022-05-25, and posted a message on > that date.

[gentoo-user] mailing list problem: changing subscription type

2022-05-29 Thread Madhu
I had subscribed to gentoo-user on 2022-05-25, and posted a message on that date. I then wished to change my subscription to no-mail delivery. The instructions I received after sending a message to gentoo-user+h...@lists.gentoo.org indicated I could do this by sending a message to

Re: [gentoo-user] Change in sudoers format?

2022-05-29 Thread Walter Dnes
Thanks for the comments everybody. I'll let etc-update do its thing. -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

2022-05-29 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:48 PM Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:49:21 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > > Until now, no improvement. (Note that I symlinked > > ~/.config/chromium-bin to ~/.config/google-chrome, otherwise I would > > lose all bookmarks. Maybe it was a bad idea?) >

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

2022-05-29 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:47 PM w...@op.pl wrote: > > New Hope! I've found this: > https://btechgeeks.com/change-chrome-keyboard-shortcuts/ > It seems that the "Shortcut manager" extension doesn't exist any more. It was supposed to allow editing the "default" shortcuts, something most pages say

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

2022-05-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:49:21 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > I've been using google-chrome, mainly because I assume, maybe wrongly, > that it means less hassle regarding codecs and such. But I'm out of > patience regarding the undocumented, uncustomizable, obnoxious, > invasive keyboard

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

2022-05-29 Thread w...@op.pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 22:39:17 Jorge Almeida napisał(a): > I suppose this means I can't simply remove the shortcuts from > chromium... () > New Hope! I've found this: https://btechgeeks.com/change-chrome-keyboard-shortcuts/ - -- xWK

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

2022-05-29 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:33 PM w...@op.pl wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 22:25:53 > Jorge Almeida napisał(a): > > > On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM w...@op.pl wrote: > > > > > Maybe take a look here: >

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

2022-05-29 Thread w...@op.pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 22:25:53 Jorge Almeida napisał(a): > On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM w...@op.pl wrote: > > > > If non-free software is not of any concern for you, then maybe try > > Vivaldi browser? It is based on the same engine and

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

2022-05-29 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM w...@op.pl wrote: > > If non-free software is not of any concern for you, then maybe try > Vivaldi browser? It is based on the same engine and feels quite like > chromium but with many many more options (USE=widevine for netflix ;) ) > I have no concerns regarding

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

2022-05-29 Thread w...@op.pl
If non-free software is not of any concern for you, then maybe try Vivaldi browser? It is based on the same engine and feels quite like chromium but with many many more options (USE=widevine for netflix ;) ) -- xWK

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

2022-05-29 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 9:56 PM w...@op.pl wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 21:49:21 > Jorge Almeida napisał(a): > > > So, is there a way to get rid of this, ahem, stuff? Ideally, I would > > remove/edit some shortcuts, but I would settle

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

2022-05-29 Thread w...@op.pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 21:49:21 Jorge Almeida napisał(a): > So, is there a way to get rid of this, ahem, stuff? Ideally, I would > remove/edit some shortcuts, but I would settle for trashing it all. Is > this an unwinnable fight? (And is the

[gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

2022-05-29 Thread Jorge Almeida
I've been using google-chrome, mainly because I assume, maybe wrongly, that it means less hassle regarding codecs and such. But I'm out of patience regarding the undocumented, uncustomizable, obnoxious, invasive keyboard shortcuts/mouse gestures. So, I decided to try chromium (-bin, for now), in

Re: [gentoo-user] Change in sudoers format?

2022-05-29 Thread Grant Taylor
On 5/29/22 9:48 AM, w...@op.pl wrote: User xyz can exacute command D on host A as user B in group C ... is just a matter of consistency ;) The group that a command is run as starts to become much more germane when you are using sudo to run commands as a different non-root user. E.g. if

Re: [gentoo-user] Change in sudoers format?

2022-05-29 Thread w...@op.pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 14:47:12 Peter Humphrey napisał(a): > On Thursday, 26 May 2022 21:54:50 BST Walter Dnes wrote: > > I just ran an update and noticed that etc-update wants to change > > the layout of /etc/sudoers, specifically... > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Change in sudoers format?

2022-05-29 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Thursday, 26 May 2022 21:54:50 BST Walter Dnes wrote: > I just ran an update and noticed that etc-update wants to change the > layout of /etc/sudoers, specifically... > > ## > > ## > ## User privilege specification > ##

Re: [gentoo-user] Change in sudoers format?

2022-05-29 Thread Michael
On Thursday, 26 May 2022 21:54:50 BST Walter Dnes wrote: > I just ran an update and noticed that etc-update wants to change the > layout of /etc/sudoers, specifically... > > ## > > ## > ## User privilege specification > ##