Am 13.11.2014 um 19:12 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
emerge -e @system went through fine completely ... but my @world is a
different thing. Some gnome-related stuff does not compile yet,
additionally complicated by the fact that I run the very unstable
packages from the gnome-overlay
Am 12.11.2014 um 10:47 schrieb Michael Mair-Keimberger:
Dracut was already mentioned. I'll give it a try later that day.
Regarding your rd.lvm.vg= flag. I guess should be put into the
grub2 entry, shouldn't it?
Yes, in the same line where you add the init= parameter.
You might add it to your
Am 12.11.2014 um 11:07 schrieb Sam Jorna:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:42:28AM +0100, Michael Mair-Keimberger
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:03:04PM +1100, wra...@wraeth.id.au
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:56:09PM +0100, Michael
Mair-Keimberger wrote:
snip
systemd. Maybe i could adopt
Am 11.11.2014 um 21:56 schrieb Michael Mair-Keimberger:
Don't get confused about the lvm flag. This just get passed to my very
simple custom initramfs
Why not try dracut for creating your initrd?
I spent *lots* of time around lvm/mdadm with systemd and grub2 back then ...
What does your own
Am 08.11.2014 um 23:17 schrieb James:
I'm trying to keep it as simple as possible (the old boot root swap
type of approach for btrfs is all I'm after for now. (simple).
I have several system to experiment on, so once I get it figured out,
I'll try a more agressive set up. For now it's
Am 07.11.2014 um 19:19 schrieb Mark Pariente:
Going to 4.9 though is another thing. Apparently they broke the ABI for
the standard C++ library, so once you start compiling C++ stuff with 4.9
you better go all in (I did @system @world with 4.9 and had very few
things that failed to compile[1],
Am 08.11.2014 um 21:27 schrieb James:
If you would be so cool as to post your subvolume setup;
I'd be very grateful:
[..]
I guess what really has me confused is to set up a traditional
fstab, uuid, efi, with grub2. I'm just dense I guess
because the aforementioned doc, I think derived
Am 08.11.2014 um 22:07 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Number Start (sector)End (sector) Size Code Name
12048 194559 94.0 MiBEF00 ESI
2 194560 480585727 229.1 GiB 8300 Linux filesystem
3 480585728 488396799 3.7
What do they do for us lucky chaps? ;-)
On October 18, 2014 1:33:18 PM GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/10/2014 06:17, Philip Webb wrote:
I just installed Kernel 3.17.0 (gentoo-sources)
noticed there are specific options for Gentoo right at the
beginning.
Are we
Am 17.09.2014 um 18:06 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
This is highly off-topic, and systemd-related, so if you don't want
your breakfast with a healthy amount of flames, skip it.
iTWire posted an interview with Linus Torvalds[1], where the Big
Penguin himself gave a succinct and pretty fair
Am 05.09.2014 um 22:07 schrieb Daniel Frey:
Going off topic a bit, but I recently bought a DN2820FYKH (Celeron
model) and it works beautifully with mythtv. Compiling is a litter
slower due to the processor, but it works well with its built-in IR.
Very happy with it. I have everything working
Am 06.09.2014 um 11:21 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I will install gentoo stable ... btw,
how did you start installing? Some rescue-disk on a stick? PXE? (I
should fix my PXE-setup ...)
Second thought: I could clone of my thinkpad-SSDs and start with that.
Should boot ... depends if some
Am 05.09.2014 um 16:51 schrieb Grant:
I have a Gigabyte 2807 (technically not a NUC but basically the same
thing) and nothing appears on the screen at all when it is connected
to a 55 OLED TV via HDMI. Just a no signal message. I was planning
to install Gentoo via a bootable USB stick but I
Am 06.08.2014 um 15:18 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:30:44 +0100, Mick wrote:
In any case 'cryptsetup -y luksAddKey /dev/sdaX' allows you to add a
passphrase in another slot - can't recall how many passphrase slots are
there without looking into it.
8. You can see which
Am 01.08.2014 um 11:38 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Greetings,
could someone pls point me at how to solve this in the right way -
I run gnome3, with gnome-keyring, seahorse, systemd-ui brings
systemd-gnome-ask-password-agent (do I need that?) and I use
pam_mount to unlock
Greetings,
could someone pls point me at how to solve this in the right way -
I run gnome3, with gnome-keyring, seahorse, systemd-ui brings
systemd-gnome-ask-password-agent (do I need that?) and I use
pam_mount to unlock and mount my encrypted home-dir (thinkpad).
As it happens I use a
Am 28.07.2014 18:47, schrieb Rich Freeman:
Anybody have a decent comparison of timedated vs ntpd or anything else
for that matter?
Running ntpd isn't hard at all, so I'm not really sure why I'd want to
switch. At the very least I'd want to ensure that the replacement
covers the basics.
Am 28.07.2014 23:20, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I am running networkd and I'm very happy with it. Setting it up for
dhcp-only is brain-dead simple, and I have it serving up a bridge for
containers/kvm with fairly little trouble as well.
shameless pointer to an older blog entry:
http
Am 28.07.2014 23:20, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
As far as I understand this:
if other ntp-software is installed, systemd-timedated.service uses the
ntp-unit with higher priority (in my current case chronyd.service) for
ntp-syncing.
So you may use the systemd-timedated.service to do
Am 25.07.2014 06:32, schrieb Pavel Volkov:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:40:36 AM MSK, James wrote:
Bloatware like gnome and KDE will be the last to get QT5, Wayland and a
myriad of new, super_fast, secure desktop toys, imho.
Well, KDE is already on Qt 5.
Strictly speaking, there's no KDE or
Am 26.07.2014 04:47, schrieb walt:
So, why did the broken machine work normally for more than a year
without rpcbind until two days ago? (I suppose because nfs-utils was
updated to 1.3.0 ?)
The real problem here is that I have no idea how NFS works, and each
new version is more
Am 27.07.2014 18:25, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Only last week I re-attacked this topic as I start using puppet here to
manage my systems ... and one part of this might be sharing /usr/portage
via NFSv4. One client host mounts it without a problem, the thinkpads
don't do so ... just
Am 21.07.2014 15:54, schrieb James:
Stefan G. Weichinger lists at xunil.at writes:
Anyone playing with wayland already?
Not yet.
Closely related, is the QT5 approach to start experimenting.
Maybe even using it as daily driver ?
I did some steps to compile and use it on my systems
Anyone playing with wayland already?
Maybe even using it as daily driver ?
I did some steps to compile and use it on my systems ... so far I wasn't
able to start up gnome 3.12 (~ gnome-shell) with gdm here.
Is it possible already?
Stefan
Am 20.06.2014 12:07, schrieb Marc Joliet:
From my own google search, at least up to 2011 per-subvolume
compression settings were not possible. Then, after subsequently
searching on the btrfs wiki for a while, I finally found an answer:
no. See this FAQ entry:
Am 26.06.2014 06:07, schrieb Dale:
I ran into a issue like this once a long time ago. I had something
wrong with my hosts file if I recall correctly. It never did make sense
as to how it messed things up but after fixing that, it worked fine.
So, I'd look at the hosts file and see if
Am 26.06.2014 12:54, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
Is your delay about 30 seconds?
hmm, I think it was shorter ... but around that, yes.
If so, that's almost certain to be related to dns lookups (30 seconds
being the magic timeout that almost everything seems to use)
Which hosts might it be then?
When I ssh into a server in my basement, this takes way more time than
usual.
I don't have a clue what might have changed ... aside from usual
updating. I rebuilt and restarted openssh down there without a change.
This is a bit annoying when logging in and using git to pull/push stuff
from/to
Am 25.06.2014 20:30, schrieb James:
Stefan G. Weichinger lists at xunil.at writes:
When I ssh into a server in my basement, this takes way more time than
usual.
Does anyone have an idea what I could do to fix that?
ssh has an ordered array of negotiations between systems
Am 25.06.2014 21:49, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
I've also noticed slowdowns recently, I think it's the new ciphers likes
ecdsa. Try this:
Connect using ssh -vvv and examine the output to find which of the
various ciphers and algorithms are used once connection is achieved. On
the client, add
Am 25.06.2014 23:10, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I will see if I can figure out what to do ...
To me it looks as if my issue is related to this line in the logs:
Jun 25 23:30:45 mythtv sshd[5387]: pam_systemd(sshd:session): Failed to
create session: Connection timed out
hmm ...
Am 25.06.2014 23:31, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
Because the openssh developers have no idea what you set up and cannot
possibly know. The phrase as good as possible has no meaning here as
the options out there in the wild as whatever they happen to be.
Having users installing their software with
Am 25.06.2014 23:31, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 25.06.2014 23:10, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I will see if I can figure out what to do ...
To me it looks as if my issue is related to this line in the logs:
Jun 25 23:30:45 mythtv sshd[5387]: pam_systemd(sshd:session): Failed
Am 25.06.2014 23:45, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
I had a problem like that and solved it by changine UseDNS no
because it is trying to look for reverse dns pointers. This is done on
the hosts /etc/ssh/sshd_config .
Tried/tested a few hours ago. No change.
pam_systemd is (or seems to be)
Am 26.06.2014 00:20, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
pam_systemd is (or seems to be) the reason, see my other posting.
maybe it would be also solved by upgrading to the (in terms of gentoo)
unstable version 214 of systemd:
# equery b pam_systemd.so
* Searching for pam_systemd.so ...
sys-apps
Anyone using that (with gentoo) ?
Experience? I consider getting one to test and use it ..
flameeyes didn't get one:
https://blog.flameeyes.eu/2012/01/how-not-to-sell-me-something-why-i-won-t-be-maintaining-yubikey-software-directly-in-gentoo
maybe since then they changed their policies etc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 18.06.2014 14:50, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:21:27 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Anyone using that (with gentoo) ?
I got one a few days ago to check out. It's basically a USB
keyboard, so it works with Gentoo exactly
Am 18.06.2014 14:54, schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
Right, I use it, and it working fine.
I use single HOTP.
The sdk/tools also build friendly, there was no problem to build in
order to perform the initial enrolment.
good to hear, thanks!
... I am quite happy now with the performance of that new server I am
preparing.
See thread Intel(R) C600 SAS Controller for that story:
https://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org/msg146119.html
Right now I get quite good results when doing backups of the 2 existing
VMs (which
Am 17.06.2014 13:04, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
BUT it remounts / without compression as well ... !
Is it a bug? A mistake or misunderstanding?
maybe also related to this bug I filed a while ago:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510148
Stefan
Am 13.06.2014 11:11, schrieb Konstantinos Agouros:
Hi,
I upgraded to qemu 2.0 however after this qemu-kvm is missing. Did this
change somehow and is called differently (to actually use the kvm features)?
the ebuild message tells you ...
Use /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 instead (for example
Am 11.06.2014 22:17, schrieb thegeezer:
On 06/11/2014 07:57 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
looks promising:
awesome. i did have a look through the diff, there are lots of scsi
drivers selected, storage (block) cgroups but i think the crucial factor
was the HZ was set at 100 previously
hello again ... noone interested? ;-)
I understand in a way ...
Maybe I have something in the kernel misconfigured ...
Right now I get these messages again:
[ 1998.118658] hpet1: lost 1 rtc interrupts
Should I disable HPET in the BIOS and/or via kernel command line?
I never know how to set
Am 11.06.2014 12:14, schrieb thegeezer:
Basically 3 RAID-6 hw-raids over 6 SAS hdds.
OK so i'm confused again. RAID6 requires minimum of 4 drives.
if you have 3 raid6's then you would need 12 drives (coffee hasn't quite
activated in me yet so my maths may not be right)
or do you have
Am 11.06.2014 12:41, schrieb thegeezer:
everything around 380 MB/s ... only ~350 MB/s for
/dev/vg01/winserver_disk0 (which still is nice)
OK here is the clue.
if the LVs are also showing such fast speed, then please can you show
your command that you are trying to run that is so slow ?
Am 11.06.2014 13:01, schrieb thegeezer:
yeah this is very very odd.
firstly there should not be such discrepancy between hdparm -t and dd if=
secondly you would imagine that the first dd would be cached and so
would be faster the second time round
please check for the turbo boost disable,
Am 11.06.2014 13:18, schrieb thegeezer:
just out of curiosity, what happens if you do # dd
if=/dev/vg01/amhold of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100 # dd if=/dev/sdc
of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100
booze ~ # dd if=/dev/vg01/amhold of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100
100+0 Datensätze ein
100+0 Datensätze aus
Am 11.06.2014 13:52, schrieb thegeezer:
ok baffling.
sdc i already said would be slower but not this much slower
it certainly should not be slower than the lvm that sits on top of it!
i can't see anything in the cgroups that stands out, maybe someone else
can give a better voice to this.
Am 11.06.2014 15:32, schrieb thegeezer:
So my kernel-config seems buggy or I should downgrade to something older?
I suspect that in your fully running system somethingelse(tm) is
stealing the activity. can you start up with no services enabled and
do the test ?
hm, yes. although I had
Am 11.06.2014 15:44, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 11.06.2014 15:32, schrieb thegeezer:
So my kernel-config seems buggy or I should downgrade to something older?
I suspect that in your fully running system somethingelse(tm) is
stealing the activity. can you start up with no services
looks promising:
virt-backup dumps and packs a 12 GB image-file within ~145 seconds to a
non-compressing btrfs subvolume:
a) does a LVM-snapshot
b) dd with bs=4M and through pigz to the target file
The bigger LV with ~250GB is running right now.
The system feels snappier than with the old
Am 27.05.2014 15:03, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
way too slow ...
I think I have some IO-topic going on ... very likely some mismatch of
block sizes ...
the hw-raid, then LVM, then the snapshot on top of that ... and a
filesystem with properties as target ... oh my.
Chosing noop
additional infos from journalctl.
I don't like the fact with 512-byte logical blocks vs. 4096-byte
physical blocks ... sounds wrong, hm?
-
Jun 10 21:54:31 booze kernel: megaraid_sas :02:00.0: Controller
type: MR,Memory size is: 512MB
Jun 10 21:54:31 booze kernel: scsi7 : LSI SAS based
Found out something about megacli and checked settings for cache and
stuff following
http://highperfpostgres.com/guides/lsi-megaraid-setup-for-postgresql/
Did I set a wrong Strip Size for the third array?
good night, late here ...
Stefan
# megacli -LDInfo -Lall -aALL
Adapter 0 -- Virtual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 27.05.2014 09:59, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
Alternative: mount the subvol via option subvolid etc in fstab
if you plan to mount different snapshots, for example.
I went with set-default for the root subvolume, if I need the root
volume I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 27.05.2014 13:25, schrieb Mick:
I recall that zfs needed a lot of RAM = 8M, is it the same with
BTRFS?
I assume you mean 8GB ?
As far as I know and researched: no, btrfs is less memory hungry and
was designed to even work fine on small devices
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 27.05.2014 13:49, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
I have zfs-snapshot making snapshots at 15 minute, hourly, daily,
monthly and weekly intervals - and it cleans up after itself. There
isn't anything quite like that for btrfs, so I'm knocking up a
Am 27.05.2014 14:12, schrieb Rich Freeman:
There is snapper, which is even in the tree now. It isn't 100%
flexible but supports any number of hourly, daily, monthly, and yearly
snapshots, with retention policies for each.
no systemd-unitfiles yet, correct? I merged it and took a quick look,
Am 26.05.2014 21:57, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 26.05.2014 19:47, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
But I somehow think the performance is sub-optimal.
virt-backup is slow as well (using dd and gzip or pigz in my own patched
version). Yes, that LVM stuff again ...
I run 6 SAS disks
Am 26.05.2014 06:47, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
On 21/05/14 13:32, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
systemd/gnome3-environment?
tmpfs /dev/shmtmpfs
nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0
/dev/cdrw /media
Am 24.05.2014 21:24, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 23.05.2014 09:52, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Greetings,
I have a new Fujitsu TX150 here, with a
Intel(R) C600 SAS Controller
and an LTO4 drive attached to it.
My kernel has support for isci, scsi tape, ahci and all the sas stuff
Am 26.05.2014 19:47, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
But I somehow think the performance is sub-optimal.
virt-backup is slow as well (using dd and gzip or pigz in my own patched
version). Yes, that LVM stuff again ...
I run 6 SAS disks and built hardware raids.
Should I look into the cache
Am 23.05.2014 09:52, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Greetings,
I have a new Fujitsu TX150 here, with a
Intel(R) C600 SAS Controller
and an LTO4 drive attached to it.
My kernel has support for isci, scsi tape, ahci and all the sas stuff
... but I don't get any st devices.
Do I
Greetings,
I have a new Fujitsu TX150 here, with a
Intel(R) C600 SAS Controller
and an LTO4 drive attached to it.
My kernel has support for isci, scsi tape, ahci and all the sas stuff
... but I don't get any st devices.
Do I need SCSI_PROC_FS set? I just wonder ...
thanks, Stefan
Am 22.05.2014 18:12, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
I'm working on this btrfs malarkey and have a question about best
practice. It is recommended to leave the root volume empty and
create a subvolume for the root filesystem which is set with btrfs
subvolume set-default, which I have done.
Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
systemd/gnome3-environment?
-
# glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
# POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink).
# (tmpfs is a dynamically expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will
# use almost no memory if not
Am 21.05.2014 15:31, schrieb Tom H:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
systemd/gnome3-environment?
# glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
# POSIX shared memory
Am 21.05.2014 21:44, schrieb Tom H:
The answer is no unless you want to apply different perms to /dev/shm.
I don't have an idea why I should want to do that so I removed the line
for now. Thanks.
Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 19.05.2014 13:01, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Mon, 19 May 2014 12:07:32 +0200, Marc Stürmer wrote:
Just take a look at the official Gotchas Page of BTRFS, which can
be found here:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Gotchas
Putting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 18.05.2014 14:28, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
I'm confused about the desirability of keeping VM image files,
usually space qcow files, on a btrfs volume. I have read the advice
about using chattr +C on the subvolume, but are there any other
gotchas?
Am 17.05.2014 20:48, schrieb Greg Turner:
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.atwrote:
It seems to not detect or interpret correctly the fact that there are 2
physical devices in there and then the linux ... line for grub.cfg
gets messed up, at least for me here
Am 19.05.2014 15:39, schrieb Rich Freeman:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
... it seems to me that this adds something like an additional layer
around certain things and helps to make all that more bulletproof?
Now that I know how to use dracut
Am 19.05.2014 22:51, schrieb Dale:
I might add, I used dracut for a while. A while back when I went to
boot back up, shutdown because my power went out, the init thingy
failed. I had zero clue on how to fix it so I edited grub to ignore the
init part and booted up the old way. Once booted,
(new thread to separate things a bit more)
Today I took the effort to completely re-install one of my two older
thinkpads.
booted via USB (sysresccd) because the X220 has no optical drive, backed
up the contents of / and the encrypted /home to an external drive and
started up gdisk to reorder
Am 17.05.2014 17:56, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
sda3 /root (the old ext4)
sda5 /root (the new btrfs)
sorry for the missing precision here ... I don't mean /root but the
root filesystem here for sure ...
Stefan
Am 15.05.2014 20:33, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 15.05.2014 20:05, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
With -H, you don't get the kernel cmdline, and therefore your kernel
cannot load your LVM volumes since it doesn't
Am 16.05.2014 13:56, schrieb Bruce Schultz:
I ask because in all my reorganizing furor I also thought that now
with btrfs only I could get rid of lvm mdraid as dracut-modules.
I can try ... ;-) (don't call me ricer)
If you have a multi-disk btrfs, I think you need to add the btrfs
dracut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 16.05.2014 14:03, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 07:14:27 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
So far, I have liked lvm, what's the advantage of btrfs over
lvm?
I have only looked at btrfs, with a consideration for switching
Am 16.05.2014 12:53, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Now for some systemd problems. The root file system was read only when
I logged in, but I could remount it rw -- not sure why this was
happening. Some units did start, but most did not.
Maybe you only got into emergency mode?
Also,
Am 16.05.2014 13:06, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
LVM is an excellent solution for what it was designed to do, which is to
deal with stuff like this:
Oops. I misjudged how big /var/log needed to be and now I need to add
50G to that partition. But it's sda6 and I have up to sda8. Argggh!
Now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 16.05.2014 14:43, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 14:35:08 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
zfs on linux ... it works fine for me on one server, but I never
really wanted it on my main machines (desktop and laptops)
although I
Am 16.05.2014 14:54, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Thanks much for that explanation.
So where do I find some documentation for btrfs and its user space tools?
There are many howtos and wiki-pages ... some examples, gentoo-related:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Getting_started
Am 16.05.2014 15:33, schrieb Hunter Jozwiak:
-Original Message-
From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:n...@digimed.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 8:06 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can't Get Systemd to Work
On Fri, 16 May 2014 07:34:16 -0400, Hunter
Am 16.05.2014 15:50, schrieb Hunter Jozwiak:
btw
Changed the line to mirror that in the Grub file, no luck.
#Append parameters to the Linux Kernel.
GRUB_CMD_LINE_LINUX=init=/usr/lib/system/systemd
Save the file.
Mount /dev/sda2 /boot grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg
Why sda2 ?
Am 16.05.2014 16:00, schrieb Jc García:
The same again you are mistyping systemd, is
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd read carefully what you copy, and verify
always those paths really exist. If you had done this, you would have
noticed /usr/lib/system/system doesn't exist at all.
( Ah, I only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 14.05.2014 11:30, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
But the encryption topic for me is interesting because I right now
have it mixed on my thinkpad:
sda1 - /boot/efi sda2 - btrfs - root etc sda3 -
cryptsetup-partition - /home on it with ext4-fs
Am 15.05.2014 08:49, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
[ It's been more than a week since I last participated in the thread,
so I'm just replying
Am 15.05.2014 09:08, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 15.05.2014 08:49, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
[ It's been more than a week since
Am 15.05.2014 11:39, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
I did not try the -H, I may test with that later.
I did look at the --print-cmdline and copied the volumes they mentioned,
but I have other lvm volumes in my fstab and none of them were activated,
only the ones I specified in the command
Am 15.05.2014 11:58, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
What is kerninst? I do not see it in the repository.
https://github.com/canek-pelaez/kerninst
... but it uses GRUB2
Am 15.05.2014 12:19, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Sure, but what I was looking for was a way to start syslogd and klogd
using systemd -- I do have a socket option so they can listen on the
socket so that should be OK.
So you look for service files?
A quick google finds examples for these 2
Am 15.05.2014 13:50, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:26 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
[snip]
Well, the workaround sort of worked -- it
Am 15.05.2014 14:38, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 15.05.2014 13:50, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014
Am 15.05.2014 20:23, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
John, could you please include here the output of lsblk, your fstab,
your dracut.conf, and your lilo.conf?
.. I agree! it's hard to keep track and overview in here :-)
Am 15.05.2014 20:05, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
With -H, you don't get the kernel cmdline, and therefore your kernel
cannot load your LVM volumes since it doesn't know their... names? I
don't knot the terminology.
In any case, you need to set --hostonly-cmdline (or
hostonly_cmdline=yes
Am 15.05.2014 20:27, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 15.05.2014 20:05, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
With -H, you don't get the kernel cmdline, and therefore your kernel
cannot load your LVM volumes since it doesn't know their... names? I
don't knot the terminology.
In any case, you need
Am 15.05.2014 22:38, schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
image=/boot/vmlinuz-3.6.2-gentoo
phew. 3.6.2 is from October 2012 ...
Did you recompile it with the suggested options for systemd?
Maybe it doesn't matter, but just a thought ... that kernel is quite old.
Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 14.05.2014 02:39, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
Doesn't that screw up the whole idea of checksumming etc ?
Not to my mind. The bits are recorded and checksummed, that's what
matters. If a bit on a platter is flipped, the decrypted bits will
also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 14.05.2014 10:42, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Wed, 14 May 2014 10:01:42 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
But then the container of the btrfs would be corrupted, right?
No, because each element of the RAID is encrypted separately, so
btrfs can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 14.05.2014 11:26, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
What RAID? I think of a laptop with only one SSD inside. You mean
the duplicated metadata in this case?
Ah right. I've got RAID n the brain because I'm currently resizing
the partitions for a ZFS RAID
301 - 400 of 1486 matches
Mail list logo
