Ok, just read the new news item and the linked udev-guide wiki page, and
the only thing left that I'm unsure/concerned about now is the
persistent net rules changes...
The very last line on the wiki page says:
4. Known problems
Stale 70-persistent-net.rules (or other network rules) in
Ok, I don't understand this...
Why is it that when I comment out the package.mask entries for udev:
#=sys-fs/udev-181
#=virtual/udev-181
emerge -pvuND world shows updates to udev-197, with no mention of
udev-200, but...
when I uncomment them:
=sys-fs/udev-181
=virtual/udev-181
emerge
On 2013-03-30 11:15 AM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:53:29 +0100
Rene Rasmussen gen...@paranoidix.dk wrote:
There is also the possibility to use opendns.com
I've been using them for years, and have not had any trouble. I
started using them when my ISP
On 2013-03-30 12:42 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:24:49 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Why is it that when I comment out the package.mask entries for udev:
#=sys-fs/udev-181
#=virtual/udev-181
emerge -pvuND world shows updates to udev-197, with no mention
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely* away,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about this
*anywhere*??
On 2013-03-27 6:32 AM, fantasticfears fantasticfe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-03-27 10:33 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going*completely* away,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about
Hi all,
Just a question...
Can I replace module-init-tools with kmod and stay with udev-171-r10 for
the time being?
Asked another way - is kmod fully supported by older releases of udev
like 171-r10?
Thanks
On 2013-03-27 3:43 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The real drive behind systemd is enterprise cloud type computing for
Red Hat.
I'd be interested in hearing more on this...
Link(s) to online articles is fine...
On 2013-03-27 4:41 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/27/2013 04:00 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-03-27, Kevin Chadwickma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The real drive behind systemd is enterprise cloud type computing for
Red Hat. The rest is snake oil and much of the features
On 2013-03-18 7:15 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
The above reference to 'might need packages like sys-apps/kbd', which is
now *required* by udev, suggests that now I again do need an initramsf?
That was silly - I saw kbd and read it as kmod... ok, this one is no
problem
On 2013-03-18 4:18 AM, (Nuno Silva) nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt wrote:
On 2013-03-17, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ah, ok... but as for the rest... I should be able to safely upgrade
udev, with a reasonable (I know there are no guarantees) expectation
of everything 'just working' (ie, my lvm managed /usr
Ok, spent a little time re-reading the old threads about this...
Just to confirm, changes I should make in my /etc/fstab...
snip normal fs lines
# NOTE: The next line is critical for boot!
none /proc procdefaults0 0
I can/should simply delete the above two
Ok, I sync'd this morning, and now see the warning about udev 171-r10
being masked, so I guess it is time..
I know this was discussed quite a bit a few months ago, but just to
refresh my memory...
My question is, if I am currently running 171-r10 on my server, and I
have a separate lvm
On 2013-03-17 2:17 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:46:39 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Also, should I manually fix the blockers:
[blocks B ] sys-apps/module-init-tools
(sys-apps/module-init-tools is blocking sys-apps/kmod-12-r1)
[blocks B ] sys-apps
Would anyone who is using rsnapshot be willing to share their crontab
entries?
I'm especially interested in how best to test for the
existence/availability of a remotely mounted filesystem, and run the
backup if it exists and abort if it doesn't.
Thanks
On 2013-03-15 11:40 AM, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-03-15, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I'm especially interested in how best to test for the
existence/availability of a remotely mounted filesystem, and run the
backup if it exists and abort if it doesn't
I switched to dovecot not too long ago, and I removed the authdaemond
keyword from cyrus-sasl, but it still wants to pull in courier-imap.
I want to remove courier-imap completely, but I still may need postfix
to be able to work as sasl client, which requires cyrus-sasl (since
dovecot-sasl is
Nevermind... gotta stop asking questions before my 2nd cup of coffee...
On 2013-02-23 9:19 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I switched to dovecot not too long ago, and I removed the authdaemond
keyword from cyrus-sasl, but it still wants to pull in courier-imap.
I want to remove
Hi all,
Weird, I don't use it much, but needed to run a traceroute today, and it
is failing with:
# traceroute 192.168.1.4
traceroute to 192.168.1.4 (192.168.1.4), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
send: Operation not permitted
I know the problem is in my firewall, because when I stop it,
On 2013-02-22 12:18 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Unix traceroute normally operates by sending UDP packets to
high-numbered ports with successively larger TTL values. You'll need
to make sure you are allowing outbound UDP traffic as well.
Thanks guys - I had forgotten about this
On 2013-02-14 3:20 AM, Michael Sondow mson...@iciiu.org wrote:
Hi, Tanstaafl.
As soon as I get my set of anti-malware rescue disks set up (Kaspersky,
Trend Micro, AVG, and Bitdefender), for right now on four separate USB
flash drives (thereby wasting most of the space on the flash drives!),
I'm
On 2013-02-14 2:26 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
So, my latest ideas is to sync up and then wait one week
before acutally installing those new packages. This would
allow the fodder that the good folks on this list catch,
bitch about (um, I mean file bug reports) and fix, to
occur
On 2013-02-13 4:20 AM, Michael Sondow mson...@iciiu.org wrote:
Yes, there seem to be a number of programs that will create a bootable
USB flash drive from a linux distro ISO, and also from some of the
rescue disk ISOs. Some of these utlities create persistence, but I'm
not sure what that means:
On 2013-02-12 6:30 PM, (Nuno Silva) nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt (Nuno
Silva) wrote:
I have no doubts that devs have lots of work to do, but it's a rather
serious situation if the difference between unstable and stable land is
*not* used as an advantage when it comes to deal with situations like
this
On 2013-02-10 3:43 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:40:00 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
Here's what IUSE says are enabled for the currently installed lvm2:
readline +static +static-libs clvm cman +lvm1 selinux
IUSE shows the flags that were available
I'm prepping for updating some things I've been putting off, and I
noticed that lvm2 has some new use flags set, and I'm wondering why...
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 [2.02.88] USE=lvm1 readline
thin%* udev%* (-clvm) (-cman) (-selinux) -static* -static-libs* 1,166 kB
The two that
On 2013-02-10 1:47 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 10.02.2013 19:37, schrieb Tanstaafl:
I'm pretty sure that lvm2 was NOT built with either of these, but is
there a way to to tell what USE flags were used for the currently
installed package?
I guess you remember wrongly
On 2013-02-10 2:57 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:07:38 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
So, the question becomes, why did these change? I do have /user on a
separate LVM partition, so, is this something I should worry about?
The static use flag builds a separate
On 2013-02-03 9:08 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
So what we have here is a piece of FOSS software that is too fucking
clever for it's own good. It's applying insane validation checks to
things that are not in any spec at all:
I never liked the auto-config behavior, but it
On 2013-02-03 12:51 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
The question is not whether to halt the build or not (that cannot and
will not be done) but how to do the communication:
- news item
There is one, from 2013-01-23, ending with 'Apologies if this news came
too late for you.'
On 2013-02-07 12:53 PM, Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Thursday 07 February 2013 17:40:39 Tanstaafl wrote:
So, since I have:
shm/dev/shm tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0
I change the type tmpfs to devtmpfs... ok...
I think that's a mistake (because I did
On 2013-02-07 3:28 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Enter a password, the wizard tries to validate it
Don't enter a password, the wizard prompts you for one
Get past that (using $MAGIC of course) it still tries to validate that
the server is up and something is running there.
On 2013-02-07 4:25 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I think that a lot of people will misread that like I (we) did...
I believe he is correct and /dev/shm is irrelevant for this discussion.
Ok
On 2013-01-02 7:14 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 02 Jan 2013 19:47:11 Tanstaafl wrote:
Oh, ok - so, if I don't have any rules that use the 'mangle' command,
then I can safely remove mangle support from my kernel and lose the
mangle table altogether?
Yes, I would
On 2013-01-01 7:55 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 6:50 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
So now that only one ethernet shows up, how do I prevent
udev from renaming eth0 to eth3?
Check /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules. Probably the old
Hi all,
This has been bugging me for a while...
I've googled, and can't seem to find a definitive answer to this question...
Lots of references to the Mangle table, but nothing that really explains
what this table is or does, and when or why I would want/need it.
Currently, I have this in
On 2013-01-02 10:24 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
I once had an onboard NIC go bad, and the PCI NIC I substituted for it
wouldn't work unless the onboard NIC was disabled. So disabling
onboard hardware may or may not be a net positive.
? That was confusing - unless you actually
On 2013-01-02 2:01 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have a look at 'man iptables-extensions' it gives some examples of
using -t mangle.
I haven't looked in Google recently, but there should be some examples there
too.
Oh, ok - so, if I don't have any rules that use the
On 2012-12-14 10:39 AM, Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
What Mark wrote you is golden. I might only add that if you put:
=sys-fs/udev-181
into
/etc/portage/package.mask
you will have the present stable udev from*before* those weirdos starting
messing it up, forcing
Sorry, you're right, I'll go back to sleep now... ;)
I spoke without looking, and indeed my mask is set to =181
On 2012-12-14 12:34 PM, Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:20:05AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-12-14 10:39 AM, Bruce Hillda
Anyone?
I don't see any news blurbs warning about it, but with everything going
on with udev, systemd, etc, I'm not risking updating unless/until I know
it is safe.
Tia...
Charles
On 2012-11-20 9:36 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Anyone?
I don't see any news blurbs warning about it, but with everything going on
with udev, systemd, etc, I'm not risking updating unless/until I know
On 2012-11-20 12:05 PM, Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:46:59AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
Anyone?
I don't see any news blurbs warning about it, but with everything going
on with udev, systemd, etc, I'm not risking updating unless/until I know
On 2012-11-12 2:33 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
My experience is that all so-called primitive societies have an
excellent grasp of this thing called manners - it's the oil that
lubricates social interaction.
Interestingly enough this is most likely due to the principle of
Hi all,
I thought I'd posted about this way back when I opened the bug at
sourceforge:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3494798group_id=80013atid=558446
but didn't find anything in my local archives, so I guess I didn't...
Does anyone use clucene? I'm planning on enabling FTS
On 2012-09-17 9:35 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Hi all,
I thought I'd posted about this way back when I opened the bug at
sourceforge:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3494798group_id=80013atid=558446
but didn't find anything in my local archives, so I guess
On 2012-09-17 10:25 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Never mind, just got a reply from the dev that he had fixed it and the next
update would contain the fix...
I'm still curious if I should not go down that
This has never happened to me before...
Since when did a simple GCC upgrade *automatically* REMOVE my prior GCC
install???
I have *always* kept my prior GCC around for a while, if not until the
next upgrade, just as something to fall back on if the current one breaks.
I am NOT a happy
On 2012-09-07 7:44 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
This has never happened to me before...
Since when did a simple GCC upgrade *automatically* REMOVE my prior GCC
install???
I have *always* kept my
On 2012-09-07 9:12 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Well, I've been managing this gentoo server since I installed it over 8
years ago, and I don't *ever* recall a GCC upgrade removing my prior
version.
On 2012-09-07 9:22 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Don't be stupid. I see that all the time... if you don't like it just ignore
it.
And calling someone who is trying to help you stupid is not very
On 2012-07-11 12:17 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Then you probably need portage 2.2 for this. Which will never ever become
stable it seems,
Can anyone comment on *why* it is taking so long? It is beginning to
border on ridiculous - if it is ready (which I seem to recall lots
By 'Genius' type service, I'm referring to Apple's Genius service that
helps you find new music that you might like based on your current
likes... ie, you tell it the Artists/songs you like, and it tells you
things that are similar.
It is a very interesting way to find new music/artists that
On 2012-07-06 9:00 PM, Christopher Lemire christopher.lem...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried disabling r128 and building the raedon driver into the kernel.
However, I am getting the message raedon module not found. It's not a
module. It's built into the kernel. Xorg.0.log. I mistakenly typed
raedom,
On 2012-06-24 6:11 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
I always run emerge as root.
me three...
elog is owned by portage:root, summary.log within it as portage:root, other
log files within /var/log/portage are owned by portage:portage.
hmmm... I don't even have a 'summary.anything'
On 2012-06-25 1:05 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
It appears that grub2 is coming soon.
Has the Handbook/Install docs been updated to provide for installing
Grub2 with a fresh install?
I'm about to do one, and would like to not have to switch this out later...
On 2012-06-23 7:11 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2012-06-22 12:26 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I missed that piece. I presumed there would be writes to the hard
disk.
Any reason you can't have these guys netboot?
Only that I've never done that before
On 2012-06-22 12:26 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I missed that piece. I presumed there would be writes to the hard disk.
Any reason you can't have these guys netboot?
Only that I've never done that before with servers, and my only
experience with netbooting at all was with
On 2012-06-22 12:04 AM, Matthew Marlowe m...@professionalsysadmin.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I could get 2 of these for each server, each with a mirrored pair of CF (or
SD) cards (mirror mode is defined by a jumper or switch on the
On 2012-06-22 12:04 AM, Matthew Marlowe m...@professionalsysadmin.com
wrote:
But, there is nothing keeping you from getting mirrored CF/SD cards
for the hypervisor boot
Also, my questions was more just to which cards are considered best/most
stable - SD or CF...
On 2012-06-22 11:00 AM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Also, my questions was more just to which cards are considered best/most
stable - SD or CF...
Ultimately they both probably have the same
On 2012-06-19 10:28 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
CF is really behind the times.
Really? Nothing I've read indicates that - can you point me to something
that discusses how/why Cf is 'behind the times'?
I'm serious, I just ordered the CF adapter/cards, but I'm fully prepared
to
Hi everyone,
Ok, here's my dilemma...
I have some new Dell R515 servers (12 bay versions). These do not have
any Dell supported internal SD (or CF) card options for the hypervisor,
but they do have an internal 2.5 dual SATA/SAS drive cage, for running
a bootable OS (in my case the ESXi
On 2012-06-19 9:56 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
With my last batch of ESX hosts, someone forgot to order the R710 SD
internal add-on. But it has 8 x 600M SAS drives
So what I did is configured all drives as a RAID 10 and let ESX grab
enough for the hypervisor and leave
On 2012-05-24 7:24 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
I just now started going through /var/log/portage/messages, and was
reminded of this thread.
It is much easier if you set up portage to email you these individually...
On 2012-05-23 5:25 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/23/2012 05:24 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
*Especially* for servers, there really, REALLY needs to be a way to see
this kind of warning BEFORE updating... ie, the warning should be
printed to the screen during an 'emerge -pvuDN
On 2012-05-23 5:54 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/23/2012 10:47 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Tanstaafl wants to know if a reboot*will* be required*before* he does
the update. What you are describing tells him that after the update
completes when it is already too late.
I
On 2012-05-21 5:00 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/21/2012 03:27 PM, Michael Hampicke wrote:
I updated udev from 171-r5 to 171-r6 and now i get several udevd
boot message as : udevd[1389]: can not find
'/lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules': No such file or directory
On 2012-05-23 12:49 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Tanstaafl writes:
*Especially* for servers, there really, REALLY needs to be a way to see
this kind of warning BEFORE updating... ie, the warning should be
printed to the screen during an 'emerge -pvuDN world' or something, so
I
On 2012-05-19 8:09 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
But stay away from OpenDNS like the plague. They are known to perform
false resolve, especially if the domain being resolved does not exist.
Simple to disable, been using OpenDNS for many years, no problems
whatsoever...
On 2012-05-17 12:14 PM, Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will of course
comply, though with outlook express which I'm forced to use most of
the time this is a bit tedious.
Interesting... so, you have someone standing next to
On 2012-05-14 11:26 AM, Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
in my opinion it isn't. with top posting I see the newest message
immediately, while otherwise I need page through sometimes
huge amounts of mostly obsolete comments.
This is only the case if the person who replies
On 2012-05-09 4:47 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
As some know, I'm planning to buy me a LARGE hard drive to put all my
videos on, eventually. The prices are coming down now. I keep seeing
these green drives that are made by just about every company nowadays.
When comparing them to a
On 2012-05-09 8:06 AM, m...@trausch.us m...@trausch.us wrote:
AFAIK, the only technical difference between a consumer drive and an
enterprise one is that the enterprise one doesn't tell lies. Or at
least, it isn't supposed to.
There's a bit more to it than that...
On 2012-04-17 12:21 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2012-04-17 1:41 AM, Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote:
So if it is the differing versions problem, the solution is to
upgrade to the most recent (~x86) version of eix, currently eix-0.25.3:
echo app-portage/eix
On 2012-04-18 7:08 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
h.v.bruineh...@fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 18.04.2012 12:32, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-04-17 12:21 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-04-17 1:41 AM, Vaeth wrote:
So if it is the differing versions problem, the solution is to
upgrade to the most recent (~x86
On 2012-04-17 1:41 AM, Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote:
So if it is the differing versions problem, the solution is to
upgrade to the most recent (~x86) version of eix, currently eix-0.25.3:
echo app-portage/eix /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords emerge eix
Is this safe to do
On 2012-04-17 1:41 AM, Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote:
I haven't searched layman for packages in a long time (actually had to
google how to do it), and am getting an error I can't seem to solve...
Unfortunately, you have not written the actual error
which should appear probably
Hi all,
I haven't searched layman for packages in a long time (actually had to
google how to do it), and am getting an error I can't seem to solve...
problems arised with cachefile _var_lib_layman_zugaina.eix
* Calling eix-update...
* could not read all eix cachefiles of
On 2012-04-16 2:38 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Hi all,
I haven't searched layman for packages in a long time (actually had to
google how to do it), and am getting an error I can't seem to solve...
problems arised with cachefile _var_lib_layman_zugaina.eix
* Calling eix
I've never had a need to protect a site like this so am totally new to it...
I've been reading, and everything says that digest-auth is preferred to
basic-http-auth (yes, I know that this isn't a very sophisticated level
of protection, but it is all we need for this site), but is there also a
With this error:
In file included from /usr/include/CLucene/StdHeader.h:20:0,
from /usr/include/CLucene.h:11,
from lucene-wrapper.cc:23:
/usr/include/CLucene/SharedHeader.h:18:36: fatal error:
CLucene/clucene-config.h: No such file or directory
compilation
On 2012-03-21 10:23 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:38:42 -0400 Tanstaafl wrote:
Do you have dev-cpp/clucene installed? That missing header come from
there.
Of course (I have the lucene USE flag set for dovecot):
myhst : Wed Mar 21, 08:01:06
On 2012-03-21 12:09 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:56:37 -0400 Tanstaafl wrote:
When I tried updating dovecot, it *successfully* emerged the clucene
update first (it was already installed), then the dovecot build
failed with the error...
It's quite
On 2012-03-17 8:54 AM, Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il wrote:
genkernel is pretty simple to use if you ask me.
just
emerege genkernel
Thanks, but... what part of I have never used genkernel, and have no
desire to... did you not understand?
On 2012-03-18 9:29 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know about 'depreciated' as that has a sort of special
meaning,
pet-peeve
it is deprecATED, not deprecIated
/pet-peeve
Creating a new thread for this questions since mine got lost in all of
the follow-ups...
I would really appreciate a meaningful response to this question (maybe
I should go ask this on -dev?) - this has the potential to lose me
forever as a gentoo user (I'm sure none of you are crying over
On 2012-03-17 12:11 AM, Bruce Hill, Jr.
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
An initramfs which does this is created by
=sys-kernel/genkernel-3.4.25.1 or
=sys-kernel/dracut-017-r1. If you do not want to use these tools, be
sure any initramfs you create pre-mounts /usr.
Ok, I have never
On 2012-03-14 9:03 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
*YOUR WIFE'S LAPTOP* won't boot properly without /usr on /, or an
initramfs. OK, put /usr on /, or an initramfs*ON YOUR WIFE'S LAPTOP*.
I don't have a problem with that. What gets people really upset is the
dog-in-the-manger
On 2012-03-15 5:13 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
That's why I build the initramfs into the kernel and not as a separate
file. If I do something to break the initramfs I just boot the previous
kernel knowing it will still work.
Ok, time to show my ignorance...
How would I know if
On 2012-03-15 9:05 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:41:38 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
That's why I build the initramfs into the kernel and not as a separate
file. If I do something to break the initramfs I just boot the
previous kernel knowing it will still work
On 2012-03-13 8:07 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
You want it simple? Tha'ts fine, it is possible. It's just that it
will not solve the general problem, just a very specific subset of it.
Just as mdev is doing; Walt just posted an email explaining that if
you use GNOME, KDE,
On 2012-03-03 7:26 PM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 03/03/2012 03:21 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
No one has a template they can use to simply clone me a ready to go
hardened VM?
Or interested in earning a little money?
It's probably the Microsoft Hyper-V part that's scaring
On 2012-03-03 10:55 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Mar 4, 2012 8:13 AM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
klond...@gentoo.org mailto:klond...@gentoo.org wrote:
El 04/03/12 01:26, Michael Orlitzky escribió:
It's probably the Microsoft Hyper-V part that's scaring people
On 2012-03-02 4:52 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Attempt at incorporating your command into this:
watch -n1 ps aux --sort=-%cpu | gawk 'NR==1; $3 0'
it gives me a syntax error:
Every 1.0s: ps
On 2012-03-02 3:51 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Would anyone here be interested in being paid to create a hardened VM
image for me that will run on a Microsoft Hyper-V host?
If so, what would you be willing to do this for?
Feel free to email me directly...
No one has
Does anyone know if there is a way to filter the output of ps aux to
show only lines that have a value in the %CPU column higher than x - ie,
1.0, or 2.0, or something like that?
Thanks
On 2012-03-02 12:56 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Mar 3, 2012 12:49 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a way to filter the output of ps aux to
show only lines that have a value in the %CPU column higher
On 2012-03-02 9:28 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
eselect python list --python3
and make sure you're set to 3.2 before removing 3.1.
Hmmm... mine shows it is set to 3.1...
# eselect python list --python3
Available Python 3 interpreters:
[1] python3.1 *
[2] python3.2
On 2012-03-02 1:02 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a way to filter the output of ps aux to show
only lines that have a value in the %CPU column higher than x - ie,
501 - 600 of 810 matches
Mail list logo
