I just purchased a new smartphone (samsung galaxy S III), which runs
android ice cream sandwitch 4.0.4). I would like to copy files
to and from the phone. The phone manual describes how to do this for
windows (nothing needed) and Mac (a program to download), but not for
gnu-linux. Apparently
On Wed, Jul 18 2012, Dale wrote:
Oh, make sure you config the phone to be connected to a puter. I always
forget that with my phone and it makes me scratch my head for a while
That is like my previous phone an htc incredible. This one doesn't
offer that choice (or at least I can't find it).
On Fri, Jul 13 2012, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am Freitag, 13. Juli 2012, 13:42:47 schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
I will be getting a new laptop with ssd (250GB).
I currently run ~amd64 and wonder if this is too much writing for the
flash.
I have adapted to and now enjoy gnome3. If I were
I will be getting a new laptop with ssd (250GB).
I currently run ~amd64 and wonder if this is too much writing for the
flash.
I have adapted to and now enjoy gnome3. If I were forced to run stable
to limit compiles I would still use package.accept_keywords to permit
gnome3.
Any experiences
On Fri, Jul 13 2012, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 2012-07-13 19:42, schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
I will be getting a new laptop with ssd (250GB).
I currently run ~amd64 and wonder if this is too much writing for the
flash.
I have adapted to and now enjoy gnome3. If I were forced to run
On Fri, Jul 13 2012, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 2012-07-13 20:53, schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
On Fri, Jul 13 2012, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 2012-07-13 19:42, schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
I will be getting a new laptop with ssd (250GB).
I currently run ~amd64 and wonder if this is too
On Sat, Jul 07 2012, Michael Mol wrote:
Stupid question...might your firewall be dropping packets? Check your
firewall logs.
Similarly, is there a difference in network connectivity between the
machine that works and the two that don't?
Also similarly, is the mfp on the wireless network
On Sat, Jul 07 2012, walt wrote:
On 07/07/2012 11:03 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
error: Unable to communicate with device (code=12):
hp:/net/Officejet_7300_series?zc=HPCC9932
error: Unable to print to printer. Please check device and try again.
Make me want to throw your laptop out of my
On Sat, Jul 07 2012, walt wrote:
On 07/06/2012 05:35 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I have one network (a linksys) to which all my devices are attached.
I have two laptops running ~amd64 and one desktop running amd64.
I have one scanner, an hp officejet 7310 that is (wired) ethernet
attached
On Sat, Jul 07 2012, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
On 07.07.2012 02:35, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I have one network (a linksys) to which all my devices are
attached.
I have two laptops running ~amd64 and one desktop running amd64. I
have one scanner, an hp officejet 7310 that is (wired
On Sat, Jul 07 2012, walt wrote:
On 07/07/2012 07:33 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Moreover the new printer entry in cups fails to print a test page (the
old, cups-installed, entry continues to work).
sigh Once again I forgot my number-one fallback move: I always delete
all the existing
I have one network (a linksys) to which all my devices are attached.
I have two laptops running ~amd64 and one desktop running amd64.
I have one scanner, an hp officejet 7310 that is (wired) ethernet
attached.
When I try xsane from either laptop I receive the popup saying that no
devices are
On Thu, Jul 05 2012, Philipp Riegger wrote:
On 05.07.2012 14:43, William Kenworthy wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 14:24 +0200, Philipp Riegger wrote:
On 05.07.2012 14:00, William Kenworthy wrote:
Any hints where to look next as the gdm logs arent very informative.
Hmm, do you have a user
Now that grub is slotted (slot:2 is grub2; slot:0 is legacy grub),
an update world will merge grub-2.00 along side my current
grub-0.97-r12.
Am I correct in believing that, if I *do* the emerge but *not* do
anything else with grub, I will continue to use legacy grub (-0.97-r12)
whenever I boot?
On Fri, Jun 29 2012, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
On 29.06.2012 20:46, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Now that grub is slotted (slot:2 is grub2; slot:0 is legacy grub),
an update world will merge grub-2.00 along side my current
grub-0.97-r12.
Am I correct in believing that, if I *do* the emerge
On Fri, Jun 29 2012, Todd Goodman wrote:
* Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu [120629 14:53]:
Now that grub is slotted (slot:2 is grub2; slot:0 is legacy grub),
an update world will merge grub-2.00 along side my current
grub-0.97-r12.
Am I correct in believing that, if I *do* the emerge
I have merged gnome-shell-extensions and eselect-gnome-shell-extensions.
There are of course many other extensions listed in
extensions.gnome.org and they are easy to (un-)install. I was just
wondering if any were packaged into ebuilds beyon
gnome-extra/gnome-shell-extensions.
thanks,
allan
Just today I cannot log into one of my machines (the other has not had
an emerge since early yesterday and is ok).
With gdm, I don't get a welcome screen. Just the funny cursor going
round and round.
With xdm, I do get the login screen, but both for me and for root,
after entering
On Fri, Jun 08 2012, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 08.06.2012 16:22, schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
Just today I cannot log into one of my machines (the other has not had
an emerge since early yesterday and is ok).
With gdm, I don't get a welcome screen. Just the funny cursor going
round and round
On Fri, Jun 08 2012, walt wrote:
On 06/08/2012 06:39 AM, walt wrote:
I just updated one of my ~amd64 machines and something in gnome is
badly broken now. I'm about to update another ~amd64 machine but
I'll do it one package at a time until I can identify the culprit.
The symptom is that
On Fri, Jun 08 2012, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
Just today I cannot log into one of my machines (the other has not had
an emerge since early yesterday and is ok).
With gdm, I don't get a welcome screen. Just the funny
On Mon, May 14 2012, Michael Scherer wrote:
in my opinion it isn't. with top posting I see the newest message
immidiately, while otherwise I need page through sometimes
huge amounts of mostly obsolete comments.
where it's possible, I put my messages on top, and I've found
more than once
A recent world update followed by depclean resulted in a request to
remove nearly 30 dev-perl packages (plus an old boost).
I don't use perl, but wonder what triggered this change. I have not
changed any use flags.
My inclination is to let depclean have its way, but wanted to check here
first
On Fri, May 11 2012, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 11/05/12 17:39, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
A recent world update followed by depclean resulted in a request to
remove nearly 30 dev-perl packages (plus an old boost).
I don't use perl, but wonder what triggered this change. I have not
changed any
On Tue, Apr 24 2012, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 02:41:49 Walter Dnes wrote:
You seem to be sending multipart/alternative. I didn't even notice
that there was any HTML. Here is what mutt shows when I ask it to
view attachments...
I've finally found what I think was
On Sun, Apr 22 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:21:56 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
First, thanks for the fix, hopefully not needed.
It appears that the bug is in conf-update and not shadow so the rather
brusque changing of the status of the shadow bug to resolved might
On Sun, Apr 22 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:52:39 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
The comments there say that if you run etc-update right after the
emerge all is well (but this isn't sufficient for people who use
screen, detatch, and log out). Someone also mentioned
On Fri, Apr 20 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:22:20 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'll run the update again today, paying more attention, and see what
happens.
What happened is it broke again, with no obvious signs of the cause.
conf-update reported only trivial
On Sat, Apr 21 2012, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
On 21.04.2012 17:30, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
There is a bug filed
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412721
Am I correct in believing the safe procedure is to add
=sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r2 =sys-apps/shadow-4.1.5.
to /etc
Another scare. No emacs, no apache, gnome in trouble ...
don't install icu-49.1
I was going to file a bug but I see that there are a few stating that
some things fail with 49.1 so I don't know that my adding to the list
will help.
To see the list just ask for
ALL icu
I now have to reinstall
On Wed, Apr 04 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 14:12:58 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I now have to reinstall everything that was installed after icu, or at
least try them to see if they fail.
I installed LibreOffice and Chromium after icu, LO seems to work but
Chromium
On Tue, Apr 03 2012, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:43:16 -0400
Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I forgot one of the commands alan wanted to see. Here it is.
allan
I really did want to look at this thoroughly for you, but I've been
flat on my back with some illness
On Tue, Apr 03 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:13:43 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Yes indeed I have it masked for exactly that reason. I will be going to
a combined / + /usr when the semester ends. I use this machine for my
lectures and assignments so prefer to break
A normal update world turned up the error below
(~amd64, gnome profile)
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
sys-apps/pciutils:0
(sys-apps/pciutils-3.1.9-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
On Mon, Apr 02 2012, walt wrote:
On 04/02/2012 07:20 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
A normal update world turned up the error below
(~amd64, gnome profile)
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict
I forgot one of the commands alan wanted to see. Here it is.
allan
ajglap gottlieb # fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512
On Tue, Mar 27 2012, Alan McKinnon wrote:
All you need is a decent amount of free disk space as you will shuffle
things around just like in that 15 pieces game.
This sounds encouraging. My disk is less than half full so space is not
an issue.
Assuming / is the first (or second) partition on
On Wed, Mar 28 2012, Michael Mol wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Stefan G. Weichinger writes:
Am 28.03.2012 12:24, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 27.03.2012 22:53, schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
My system wouldn't fully boot this morning after
On Wed, Mar 28 2012, Alan McKinnon wrote:
What you describe sounds ok, but I'd still hesitate to give a definite
answer without a little more data.
If you send over the output of
df -h
du -shx for each partition you have
fdisk -l
pvdisplay
vgdisplay
lvdisplay
I'll be happy to go
My system wouldn't fully boot this morning after updating lvm (~amd64).
Fortunately a mount -a followed by
emerge -1 lvm2-previous version
has be back in business (with the new lvm2 masked).
I subsequently found the bug below.
allan
On Fri, Mar 23 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 21:44:53 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I am now unable to update world
Total: 26 packages (20 upgrades, 3 new, 1 in new slot, 2
reinstalls, 1 uninstall), Size of downloads: 604,681 kB Conflict: 3
blocks
The following
On Sun, Mar 18 2012, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18 2012, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:14:48 -0700
Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I will update to the new world order, but would very much prefer to
postpone that for a few weeks. Is it enough to put
sys-fs
I will update to the new world order, but would very much prefer to
postpone that for a few weeks. Is it enough to put
sys-fs/udev-171-r5
in /etc/portage/package.mask ?
thanks,
allan
On Sun, Mar 18 2012, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:14:48 -0700
Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I will update to the new world order, but would very much prefer to
postpone that for a few weeks. Is it enough to put
sys-fs/udev-171-r5
in /etc/portage/package.mask
On Thu, Feb 16 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:31:02 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
That's it! I had collision-protect in make.conf. I just now removed it
and indeed emerge --info shows protect-owned. I have an emerge of
libreoffice running now. But hope tomorrow
Nvidia-drivers fails with package collisions
* Detected file collision(s):
*
* /usr/lib32/libnvidia-compiler.so
* /usr/lib32/libcuda.so
* /usr/lib32/libcuda.so.1
* /usr/lib64/libnvidia-compiler.so
* /usr/lib64/libcuda.so
* /usr/lib64/libcuda.so.1
But the
On Wed, Feb 15 2012, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
Nvidia-drivers fails with package collisions
* Detected file collision(s):
*
* /usr/lib32/libnvidia-compiler.so
* /usr/lib32/libcuda.so
* /usr/lib32
On Wed, Feb 15 2012, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
Nvidia-drivers fails with package collisions
* Detected file collision(s):
*
* /usr
On Wed, Feb 15 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:44:18 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Good to know. I guess the default setting must be to overwrite as
I've not made any of those setting changes.
emerge --info will show you the settings in use.
Of course, but if you don't
On Thu, Feb 02 2012, Gregory Shearman wrote:
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
On 02/02/2012, at 11:02, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I am asking for a recommendation of a router/wap. I know the
wired/wireless tradeoffs.
thanks, allan
Sorry, read it as wired or wireless
should have an ethernet port (beyond the 4 above)
to accept the modem output (I realize it is all bidirectional).
Suggestions?
thanks,
allan gottlieb
On Wed, Feb 01 2012, bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On 02/02/2012, at 9:08, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I have a linksys wrt54G that is acting a little funny.
Since my new laptop supports 1Gig wired ethernet and the wrt is 100Meg,
I should upgrade even if the funny turns out
On Tue, Dec 20 2011, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Sat, December 17, 2011 2:37 am, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
SNIPPED
3. I decided to use another suggestion (from neil) to use
PORTAGE_TMPDIR, roeleveld's idea of just using temporary space, and
Webb
On Sun, Dec 18 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18 2011, Joshua Murphy wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I get dependency problems in my normal update world that I can't
understand. The entire output is below.
As far as I can tell gnome
I get dependency problems in my normal update world that I can't
understand. The entire output is below.
As far as I can tell gnome-2.32.1-r1 (which is installed) is requiring
packages from gnome-3, which must be wrong. I don't see any such
dependencies in the ebuild for gnome-2.32.1-r1 and
On Sun, Dec 18 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I get dependency problems in my normal update world that I can't
understand. The entire output is below.
As far as I can tell gnome-2.32.1-r1 (which is installed) is requiring
packages from gnome-3, which must be wrong. I don't see any
On Sun, Dec 18 2011, Joshua Murphy wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I get dependency problems in my normal update world that I can't
understand. The entire output is below.
As far as I can tell gnome-2.32.1-r1 (which is installed) is requiring
On Sat, Dec 17 2011, pk wrote:
On 2011-12-17 05:59, Dale wrote:
Has anyone else noticed this? I upgraded this a while back and I didn't
use anywhere near this amount of space. I'm curious as to why Allan's is
using so much.
Perhaps you should compare USE flags? And if you are using the
I run gnome3 on a test laptop, but want to wait until intersession to
install it on my real laptop. I will probably like gnome3, but had a
bad experience a few months ago when gnome-shell repeatedly crashed so
want to wait for a quiet time to do the upgrade.
Anyway, weeks ago I installed the
On Sat, Dec 17 2011, walt wrote:
On 12/17/2011 06:22 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by gnome-base/nautilus-3.2.1-r1[previewer]
Do you have the 'previewer' useflag set? I'm guessing that
the older nautilus doesn't have
On Sat, Dec 17 2011, Philip Webb wrote:
111216 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
3. I decided to use another suggestion (from neil) to use
PORTAGE_TMPDIR, roeleveld's idea of just using temporary space, and
Webb suggested /z for extra space.
So I made a normal linux ext3 partition on sda8
On Thu, Dec 15 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I need to add space to /var (thank you, libreoffice), which is on lvm.
Since my one volume group vg is getting low, I thought this would be a
good time to extend it as well.
Alan (McKinnon) has posted very helpful lvm bits (reprinted below
On Fri, Dec 16 2011, Dale wrote:
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
One more thing. Some readers were suggesting I need 8 or so GB for
libreoffice. The failures occurred with 13GB. Today's /mnt/junk
success required 16GB. Fortunately sda8 has 50GB.
Dang !!
pkg_pretend() {
if [[ ${MERGE_TYPE
On Fri, Dec 16 2011, Dale wrote:
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16 2011, Dale wrote:
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
One more thing. Some readers were suggesting I need 8 or so GB for
libreoffice. The failures occurred with 13GB. Today's /mnt/junk
success required 16GB. Fortunately sda8 has
I need to add space to /var (thank you, libreoffice), which is on lvm.
Since my one volume group vg is getting low, I thought this would be a
good time to extend it as well.
Alan (McKinnon) has posted very helpful lvm bits (reprinted below).
Following alan's bottom up creation mandate I believe
On Mon, Nov 28 2011, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Though I don’t use either Gnome version, I believe that we are quite safe with
Gentoo for a while longer, as compared with most other distros out there. At
least that is what I remember from my KDE experience; (almost) all distros
jumped on the
On Sun, Nov 27 2011, Dan Johansson wrote:
On Sunday 27 November 2011 02.02:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
In the last day or two wicd broke badly due to a net-tools upgrade.
The recommended workarounds are to specify USE=old
In the last day or two wicd broke badly due to a net-tools upgrade.
The recommended workarounds are to specify USE=old-output
for net-tools or to downgrade net-tools one version (I am ~amd64).
Neither of these have helped me. Wicd cannot start either the
wired or wireless interface.
When I
On Fri, Nov 25 2011, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
In the last day or two wicd broke badly due to a net-tools upgrade.
The recommended workarounds are to specify USE=old-output
for net-tools or to downgrade net-tools one version (I
I am reinstalling gentoo on a Dell inspiron 6400 laptop
I am (again) using lvm2.
I just built the kernel and then (following the lvm2 guide) tried
emerge lvm2
This required a build of help2man, which failed with
Configuring source in
On Wed, Nov 16 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I am reinstalling gentoo on a Dell inspiron 6400 laptop
I am (again) using lvm2.
I just built the kernel and then (following the lvm2 guide) tried
emerge lvm2
This required a build of help2man, which failed with
Configuring source in
/mnt/var
On Nov 16, 2011 5:45 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I am reinstalling gentoo on a Dell inspiron 6400 laptop
I am (again) using lvm2.
I just built the kernel and then (following the lvm2 guide) tried
emerge lvm2
On Sat, Nov 12 2011, Albert W. Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 21:41 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
3. Some advised blowing away .../persistent-net.rules.
I chose to modify it so that the new device is now eth0 and the
old
device is gone.
Removing it does the same thing
On Sat, Nov 12 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 08:44:16 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Removing it does the same thing. The device file is re-created with
the currently probed hardware and indexes start from 0. It's just
that most people prefer to just remove it because
My dell laptop E6510 had its motherboard replaced (as it turned out, for
no good reason) and now the wired ethernet fails.
ajglap gottlieb # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 restart
* Bringing up interface eth0
* ERROR: interface eth0 does not exist
* Ensure that you have loaded the
On Fri, Nov 11 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
My dell laptop E6510 had its motherboard replaced (as it turned out, for
no good reason) and now the wired ethernet fails.
Thank you florian, alan, michael, and mick.
This list is one of gentoo's strongest advantages.
To summarize the responses
On Mon, Oct 24 2011, Michael Mol wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011 7:21 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, lack of DMA is another story for hard disks, certainly. Here's
where my ignorance of hardware limits my thinking:
AFAIK the device driver *always* sits between the disk drive and the
DMA
On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Hi Alan,
Is there something in dmesg related to the gnome-shell segfaults?
Best,
Michael
Indeed!
oldlap ~ # dmesg | grep gnome-shell
gnome-shell[3325] general protection ip:b6853dc2 sp:bfdba6d4 error:0 in
On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
gnome-shell segfaults.
I remember some problems with gnome-shell and GL from the dri-devel-ML.
What video-card are you using? Drivers/version?
Is there any other WM you can start, execute
gnome-shell --replace
in a console and dump the
On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
What's the output of lspci | grep VGA?
oldlap ~ # lspci -v | grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) (prog-if 00 [VGA
controller])
And just to
On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Michael Mol wrote:
I've skipped most of the thread, so forgive me if this was already
done...try rebuilding libmozjs? Bumping its version up or down?
oldlap ~ # equery b /usr/lib/libmozjs185.so
* Searching for /usr/lib/libmozjs185.so ...
dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5
On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
hmm, for sure your problem is not video-related then. gjs is the
javascript-bindings for gnome... You could try keeping spidermonkey
at 1.8.5 and (re-)build the latest version of gjs. google-ing your
problem clearly shows: you are not
On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I typed that command as root (no complaints)
and restarted gdm (twice).
Same problem
oldlap ~ # dmesg | grep gnome-shell
gnome-shell[3479] general protection ip:b682bdc2
On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
Not sure what to do now other than wait/hope that 3.2.1 (to be released
next week) makes it to the overlay and is better for me.
That's an option, of course. I don't know
On Tue, Oct 11 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0.
Weird; for me it works so much better than 3.0.
Summary:
gdm-3.2.0-r1 crashes and when I revert to the 3.0 gdm, I
On Wed, Oct 12 2011, David Abbott wrote:
Here is the patch to fix totem-pl-parser with the new quvi api
https://386651.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=289447action=diffcollapsed=context=patchformat=rawheaders=1
HTH
David
Thank you. I follow that bug and know about the patch. Since I
On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I notice that I have the default accessibility use flag on.
I am tempted to turn it off to reduce the number of packages
involved. Any downside?
Not that I know of. Can
On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
gnome-shell segfaults.
I remember some problems with gnome-shell and GL from the dri-devel-ML.
What video-card are you using? Drivers/version?
Is there any other WM you can start, execute
gnome-shell --replace
in a console and dump the
On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
It's really weird; can I see /var/log/messages (or whatever logger
file you have)? With Enable=true in the [debug] key on
/etc/gdm/custom.conf, we should be able to see why gdm is dying.
The output is below
My flags are:
Installed versions:
On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
On Wednesday, 12. October 2011 18:02:16 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Actually the gnome-shell segfault is the 2nd problem. gdm crashes with
Oh no, a problem has occurred unless its gnome-shell use flag is
disabled, which could possibly
On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Here are the logs (update word with gnome-keyring is running now).
The update world (sorry for the typo above) with gnome-keyring finished
and again gdm flashes the blue curtain of life before having its
oh, no death.
The video card is intel, build
On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
If it is related to the video card/driver that you use, try reemerging
cogl and clutter; it doesn't matter that a world upgrade don't want to
reemerge it, sometimes the ebuilds change without changing versions.
My versions and useflags of cogl
On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
If it is related to the video card/driver that you use, try reemerging
cogl and clutter; it doesn't matter that a world upgrade don't want to
reemerge it, sometimes the ebuilds change without changing
For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0.
Summary:
gdm-3.2.0-r1 crashes and when I revert to the 3.0 gdm, I get to the
login screen but then gnome-shell crashes. I tried to downgrade to
gnome-shell-3.0.2-r1, but that needs libgnome-menu, which is not in
portage/layman.
The crash
On Tue, Oct 11 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0.
Weird; for me it works so much better than 3.0.
Summary:
gdm-3.2.0-r1 crashes and when I revert to the 3.0 gdm, I
On Tue, Oct 11 2011, David Abbott wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0.
Weird; for me it works so much better than 3.0
Has something happened to the gnome overlay.
It seems to exist
oldlap ~ # layman -L | grep gnome
* gnome [Git ] (git://git.o.g.o/proj/gnome.git, h...)
* gnome-live[Git ] (git://git.o.g.o/proj/gnome-live.g...)
But it seems to not exist
On Wed, Sep 21 2011, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
Has something happened to the gnome overlay.
It seems to exist
oldlap ~ # layman -L | grep gnome
* gnome [Git ] (git://git.o.g.o/proj/gnome.git
On Wed, Sep 21 2011, Paul Hartman wrote:
There were changes to layman lately, maybe you need to rename or
change your config. In layman.cfg I see this:
In my layman.cfg I see:
#---
# The list of locally installed overlays
installed:
On Tue, Sep 20 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:57:03 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
When revdep-rebuild --library is suggested should we run it
before or after the ordinary revdep-rebuild that we typically
run after each update world?
(That was actually my original question
201 - 300 of 817 matches
Mail list logo
