[gentoo-user] A quick fix for xdirectfb is up on bugs.gentoo.org

posts. Thought I'd pass it on as a couple of others had the same problem. Off to try it out now. Anthony. -- Anthony Hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Charles Darwin University -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] xdirectfb on 2005 - no binary after compilation - any tips to get xdirectfb working

On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 18:49 +0900, Steve B wrote: > On 6/29/05, anthony hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a Matrox G550 dual head graphics card and I want to have DirectFB > > running on one head for VDR output http://www.cadsoft.de/vdr/ using > &g

Re: [gentoo-user] xdirectfb on 2005 - no binary after compilation - any tips to get xdirectfb working

On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 09:31 -0400, Matthew Cline wrote: > > On 6/29/05, anthony hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyone have any tips on getting XdirectFB working on gentoo 2005? > > There's also a lengthy post in the forums about it: > > http

[gentoo-user] xdirectfb on 2005 - no binary after compilation - any tips to get xdirectfb working

Hi, I have a Matrox G550 dual head graphics card and I want to have DirectFB running on one head for VDR output http://www.cadsoft.de/vdr/ using softdevice, and the other head running XDirectFB so I have a local graphical desktop. The latest ebuild for xdirectfb is broken the compile runs but prod