Re: [gentoo-user] OpenSSH upgrade warning

2015-11-10 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/10/2015 01:26 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > > I think you are approaching this problem from the wrong viewpoint. You > > have to assume an attacker has vastly more resources to bear on the > > problem than you

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenSSH upgrade warning

2015-11-10 Thread Jeff Smelser
I am going to stop this convo. As soon as you say it cant be brute forced, I am going to move on. Good luck with that. On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 11/10/2015 02:00 PM, Jeff Smelser wrote: > > > > I guess from this your as

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenSSH upgrade warning

2015-11-10 Thread Jeff Smelser
lov wrote: > > > > > > On 11/10/2015 09:17 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> On 11/10/2015 02:00 PM, Jeff Smelser wrote: > >>> I guess from this your assuming that everyones passwords that > >>> have been hacked are god, birthdays and such? > >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenSSH upgrade warning

2015-11-09 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > A major upgrade to OpenSSH is being stabilized: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18 > > The default of PermitRootLogin for sshd in the new version is > "prohibit-password". If you typically log in to the

Re: [gentoo-user] !!!!

2015-08-18 Thread Jeff Smelser
What did you update? Nothing I remember recently came out to break like this. On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Alan Grimes alonz...@verizon.net wrote: Like a stupid dumbfuck, I tried to update my machine today tortoise ~ # revdep-rebuild /bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries:

Re: [gentoo-user] compiling via distcc

2015-02-11 Thread Jeff Smelser
People do it all the time. You have to set up the amd64's to cross compile. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Distcc/Cross-Compiling On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote: I have an old eeepc 1GB ram and would like to install Gentoo on it as Xubuntu and Fedora both

Re: [gentoo-user] Update a portage package

2014-09-14 Thread Jeff Smelser
Looks like they have a couple people taking care of it: http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-libs/glyr/ChangeLog?view=markup On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Henrique Lengler henriquel...@openmailbox.org wrote: On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 05:56:48PM +0200, Alan McKinnon

Re: [gentoo-user] NdoUtils Wont Load module in nagios

2014-09-08 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:02 AM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote: What is the result of the following: # ls -lsah /usr/bin/ndomod.o ? --()-[0s)# ls -lsah /usr/bin/ndomod.o 76K -rwxr-xr-x 1 nagios nagios 75K Sep 7 19:26 /usr/bin/ndomod.o

Re: [gentoo-user] NdoUtils Wont Load module in nagios

2014-09-08 Thread Jeff Smelser
Core Development Team and Community Contributors [18-12-2012 17:39:07] LOG VERSION: 2.0 [ Let me know if I missed something. On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/09/2014 02:32, Jeff Smelser wrote: I have been racking my head trying to figure out

Re: [gentoo-user] NdoUtils Wont Load module in nagios

2014-09-08 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:52 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote: Assuming nagios runs as user 'nagios', can you run: # ldd /usr/bin/ndomod.o --()-[78s)# sudo su - nagios nagios@kyle ~ $ ldd /usr/bin/ndomod.o linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7fff6e1c7000) libc.so.6 = /lib64/libc.so.6

Re: [gentoo-user] NdoUtils Wont Load module in nagios

2014-09-08 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like your problem is not the same. I'm just starting myself to come to grips with this part of nagios, so I don't know how much further hhelp I can be. One thing that does stick out though is the taken

[gentoo-user] NdoUtils Wont Load module in nagios

2014-09-07 Thread Jeff Smelser
I have been racking my head trying to figure out why this module wont load. All the privs are correct as far as I can see. Sep 7 19:22:32 kyle nagios: Nagios 3.5.1 starting... (PID=32513) Sep 7 19:22:32 kyle nagios: Local time is Sun Sep 07 19:22:32 CDT 2014 Sep 7 19:22:32 kyle nagios: LOG

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?

2005-11-16 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:50 pm, Derek Tracy wrote: That is what I was  thinking when I switched to stable.  From what I am seeing either my computer doesn't like stable code or stable does not mean stable anymore. But thats not what you said. I Quote: In the past I have always

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?

2005-11-16 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:55 pm, Benjamin Martin wrote: True that the installations become identical very soon. But what if I set up server using stage 1 and an up-to-date portage tree. After the installation is finished it'll sit around doing whatever it's supposed to do and I don't

Re: [gentoo-user] amaroK launching Kmail = virus?

2005-11-16 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 03:37 pm, abhay wrote: I nailed it on my system. I had some free time so installed gdb and ran amarok. Looks like if Retrieve similar artists is checked under Last.fm, it crashes amaroK. I unchecked the option and now it runs flawlessly. Check it in your case as

Re: [gentoo-user] amaroK launching Kmail = virus?

2005-11-15 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 09:42 am, Fernando Meira wrote: been using amaroK for a long time now, and just few days ago, something weird started to happen. At some point, when changing song, I get an error message saying that amaroK was unable to launch Kmail. I do not have Kmail, so I

Re: [gentoo-user] amaroK launching Kmail = virus?

2005-11-15 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 12:02 pm, abhay wrote: Same problem here as well but since I use KMail, I know what is happening. Amarok is crashing weirdly. Amarok crashes and tries to send a bug report using KMail but interestingly it keeps on playing music and does what it is supposed to but

Re: [gentoo-user] portage: fixed or not???

2005-11-07 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Monday 07 November 2005 02:04 pm, Jarry wrote: Which you are not doing, and frankly, you're pretty lucky that something hasn't blown up up to now. That might happen, sooner o later. But still I think it is still better than leaving some hole for uninvited visitors. Thanks for your

Re: [gentoo-user] portage: fixed or not???

2005-11-07 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Monday 07 November 2005 03:52 pm, Holly Bostick wrote: No, no, Jeff, that is apparently where you are wrong: Heh, I missed this tidbit.. Jarry schreef: Well, this will be probably criticised, but after every upgrade (independently of what was really updated) I restart sshd, named,

Re: [gentoo-user] portage: fixed or not???

2005-11-07 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Monday 07 November 2005 03:38 pm, Jarry wrote: As I said previously: fixing errors later is my problem. But if I do not close some security leak, it would be then problem for me and maybe someone else too. There are too many unpatched and vulnerable computers on the net, I did not want to

Re: [gentoo-user] MySQL issue

2005-11-03 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Thursday 03 November 2005 07:49 am, C. Beamer wrote: ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (111) I googled for this and gather that it has something to do with the placement of the mysqld.sock file. The problem is the only

Re: [gentoo-user] MySQL Upgrade

2005-11-02 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 04:58 pm, C. Beamer wrote: A better description would have been that the restore worked. However, the only database that was restored was the test database. The database that I had created by creating a directory that was named after the database that I had

Re: [gentoo-user] MySQL Upgrade

2005-11-02 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 12:52 pm, C. Beamer wrote: Up until now, what I needed to do in MySQL, I could do just fine and never even knew about mysqldump until recently. As I previously stated, I've only been using Gentoo since September. When I used to use FC4, all I ever did was make

Re: [gentoo-user] MySQL Upgrade

2005-11-02 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 02:23 pm, kashani wrote: Because once you start caring about your db that much it's usually easier to setup a crap box that replicates off your master. Then you can lock the whole db on your slave and do a mysqldump without causing issues on your main db

Re: [gentoo-user] PANIC !!!!

2005-10-21 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Friday 21 October 2005 02:24 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: what do you mean 'crashed'? does revdep-rebuilt still works? but at least now you know why you should not use --deep. Why not? I use it here and I never get crashes.. One doesnt mean the other. Jeff -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-user] PANIC !!!!

2005-10-21 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Friday 21 October 2005 03:30 pm, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote: sorry by the way I put it Jeff I got to angry when All my services stop working after an ( what should be simple ) update . Actually, I wasn't referring to your email, I was referring to Hemmann's. Jeff --

Re: [gentoo-user] PANIC !!!!

2005-10-21 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Friday 21 October 2005 07:21 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: which a) does not catch all the cases and b) would not be needed at all, if you don't do '--deep' updates. Your trolling, arnt you? Are you really so naive that you think not having --deep solves all your problems? You do

Re: [gentoo-user] HyperThreading won't activate

2005-10-20 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 10:55 pm, Statux wrote: I've got a 3.0GHz P4 with HyperThreading (Intel 531 processor for those of you who know of the Intel Processor Numbers) - kernel 2.6.13. I've enabled SMP and the HT scheduling option in the kernel config along with ACPI as I was told that