On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 01:26 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> > I think you are approaching this problem from the wrong viewpoint. You
> > have to assume an attacker has vastly more resources to bear on the
> > problem than you
I am going to stop this convo. As soon as you say it cant be brute forced,
I am going to move on.
Good luck with that.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 02:00 PM, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> >
> > I guess from this your as
lov wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/10/2015 09:17 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >> On 11/10/2015 02:00 PM, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> >>> I guess from this your assuming that everyones passwords that
> >>> have been hacked are god, birthdays and such?
> >>>
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> A major upgrade to OpenSSH is being stabilized:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18
>
> The default of PermitRootLogin for sshd in the new version is
> "prohibit-password". If you typically log in to the
What did you update? Nothing I remember recently came out to break like
this.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Alan Grimes alonz...@verizon.net wrote:
Like a stupid dumbfuck, I tried to update my machine today
tortoise ~ # revdep-rebuild
/bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries:
People do it all the time. You have to set up the amd64's to cross compile.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Distcc/Cross-Compiling
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an old eeepc 1GB ram and would like to install Gentoo on it as
Xubuntu and Fedora both
Looks like they have a couple people taking care of it:
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-libs/glyr/ChangeLog?view=markup
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Henrique Lengler
henriquel...@openmailbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 05:56:48PM +0200, Alan McKinnon
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:02 AM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
What is the result of the following:
# ls -lsah /usr/bin/ndomod.o
?
--()-[0s)# ls -lsah /usr/bin/ndomod.o
76K -rwxr-xr-x 1 nagios nagios 75K Sep 7 19:26 /usr/bin/ndomod.o
Core Development Team and Community Contributors
[18-12-2012 17:39:07] LOG VERSION: 2.0
[
Let me know if I missed something.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 08/09/2014 02:32, Jeff Smelser wrote:
I have been racking my head trying to figure out
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:52 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Assuming nagios runs as user 'nagios', can you run:
# ldd /usr/bin/ndomod.o
--()-[78s)# sudo su - nagios
nagios@kyle ~ $ ldd /usr/bin/ndomod.o
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7fff6e1c7000)
libc.so.6 = /lib64/libc.so.6
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Looks like your problem is not the same. I'm just starting myself to
come to grips with this part of nagios, so I don't know how much further
hhelp I can be.
One thing that does stick out though is the taken
I have been racking my head trying to figure out why this module wont load.
All the privs are correct as far as I can see.
Sep 7 19:22:32 kyle nagios: Nagios 3.5.1 starting... (PID=32513)
Sep 7 19:22:32 kyle nagios: Local time is Sun Sep 07 19:22:32 CDT 2014
Sep 7 19:22:32 kyle nagios: LOG
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:50 pm, Derek Tracy wrote:
That is what I was thinking when I switched to stable. From what I am
seeing either my computer doesn't like stable code or stable does not mean
stable anymore.
But thats not what you said. I Quote:
In the past I have always
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:55 pm, Benjamin Martin wrote:
True that the installations become identical very soon. But what if I set
up server using stage 1 and an up-to-date portage tree. After the
installation is finished it'll sit around doing whatever it's supposed to
do and I don't
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 03:37 pm, abhay wrote:
I nailed it on my system. I had some free time so installed gdb and ran
amarok. Looks like if Retrieve similar artists is checked under Last.fm,
it crashes amaroK. I unchecked the option and now it runs flawlessly. Check
it in your case as
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 09:42 am, Fernando Meira wrote:
been using amaroK for a long time now, and just few days ago, something
weird started to happen.
At some point, when changing song, I get an error message saying that
amaroK was unable to launch Kmail.
I do not have Kmail, so I
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 12:02 pm, abhay wrote:
Same problem here as well but since I use KMail, I know what is happening.
Amarok is crashing weirdly. Amarok crashes and tries to send a bug report
using KMail but interestingly it keeps on playing music and does what it is
supposed to but
On Monday 07 November 2005 02:04 pm, Jarry wrote:
Which you are not doing, and frankly, you're pretty lucky that something
hasn't blown up up to now.
That might happen, sooner o later. But still I think it is still better
than leaving some hole for uninvited visitors.
Thanks for your
On Monday 07 November 2005 03:52 pm, Holly Bostick wrote:
No, no, Jeff, that is apparently where you are wrong:
Heh, I missed this tidbit..
Jarry schreef:
Well, this will be probably criticised, but after every upgrade
(independently of what was really updated) I restart sshd, named,
On Monday 07 November 2005 03:38 pm, Jarry wrote:
As I said previously: fixing errors later is my problem. But if I do
not close some security leak, it would be then problem for me and maybe
someone else too. There are too many unpatched and vulnerable computers
on the net, I did not want to
On Thursday 03 November 2005 07:49 am, C. Beamer wrote:
ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket
'/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (111)
I googled for this and gather that it has something to do with the
placement of the mysqld.sock file.
The problem is the only
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 04:58 pm, C. Beamer wrote:
A better description would have been that the restore worked. However,
the only database that was restored was the test database. The database
that I had created by creating a directory that was named after the
database that I had
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 12:52 pm, C. Beamer wrote:
Up until now, what I needed to do in MySQL, I could do just fine and
never even knew about mysqldump until recently. As I previously stated,
I've only been using Gentoo since September. When I used to use FC4,
all I ever did was make
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 02:23 pm, kashani wrote:
Because once you start caring about your db that much it's usually
easier to setup a crap box that replicates off your master. Then you can
lock the whole db on your slave and do a mysqldump without causing
issues on your main db
On Friday 21 October 2005 02:24 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
what do you mean 'crashed'?
does revdep-rebuilt still works?
but at least now you know why you should not use --deep.
Why not? I use it here and I never get crashes.. One doesnt mean the other.
Jeff
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
On Friday 21 October 2005 03:30 pm, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
sorry by the way I put it Jeff I got to angry when All my services
stop working after an ( what should be simple ) update .
Actually, I wasn't referring to your email, I was referring to Hemmann's.
Jeff
--
On Friday 21 October 2005 07:21 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
which a) does not catch all the cases
and b) would not be needed at all, if you don't do '--deep' updates.
Your trolling, arnt you? Are you really so naive that you think not having
--deep solves all your problems? You do
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 10:55 pm, Statux wrote:
I've got a 3.0GHz P4 with HyperThreading (Intel 531 processor for those
of you who know of the Intel Processor Numbers) - kernel 2.6.13. I've
enabled SMP and the HT scheduling option in the kernel config along with
ACPI as I was told that
28 matches
Mail list logo