On Tuesday 01 September 2015 11:55:12 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>On 01/09/2015 02:12, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
[...]
>
>Got it, finally :-)
>
>fail2ban wants sys-apps/systemd[python(-)], and systemd-219_p112 is the
>highest version with an explicit python USE flag. All later versions do
>not have the flag at all.
>
>Your choices are either to have fail2ban fixed to deal with recent
>systemd USE, and tolerate the systemd downgrade meanwhile; or to replace
>fail2ban with something equivalent

That'll be because the systemd python bindings were split into a separate 
package upstream.  But fail2ban already depends on it:

        systemd? ( $(python_gen_cond_dep '|| (
                dev-python/python-systemd[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
                sys-apps/systemd[python(-),${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
        )' 'python*' ) )

So maybe the OP just needs to unmask python-systemd?

HTH
-- 
Marc Joliet
--
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to