Re: [gentoo-user] Specific MAKEOPTS for one package

2018-10-01 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/01/2018 07:34 AM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > First, cpufreq-set seems to be not available on gentoo anymore. Doesn't > matter, just giving it a try. > You want sys-power/cpupower these days.

Re: [gentoo-user] Specific MAKEOPTS for one package

2018-09-25 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 09/25/2018 09:25 AM, Klaus Ethgen wrote> > Is there an option to set -j1 just for firefox package? (and rust, that > has the same problem)? > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki//etc/portage/package.env

Re: [gentoo-user] --depclean and sys-devel/gcc

2018-08-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 08/09/2018 10:49 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: > I run a stable system so am surprised to see that eix reports > I have gcc version ~7.3.0-r3 installed. (gcc-config -l reports > that stable x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-6.4.0 is the active compiler) > > More surprising is that >emerge --depclean

Re: [gentoo-user] virtualbox-modules fails to update: incompatible gcc/plugin versions

2018-07-24 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 07/24/2018 04:18 AM, gevisz wrote: > # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=120 --ask world > > Shall I recompile gcc? > Nope, recompile your kernel. Your kernel and virtualbox-modules (which incorporates stuff from your kernel build) both need to be compiled with the

Re: [gentoo-user] Wrong instructions when installing Oracle JRE

2018-04-11 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 04/11/2018 06:27 AM, Dale wrote: > > I think that is where they were talking about moving it from.  At one > point, they were discussing putting it in /var somewhere.  Maybe they > decided not to move it at all.  I seem to recall there being a quite > active and lengthy thread about it on -dev

Re: [gentoo-user] openvpn rc script dependencies

2018-04-10 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 04/10/2018 07:25 AM, Simon Thelen wrote: > > Also check /etc/rc.conf and try setting rc_depend_strict="NO". I do wish > there were a way to modify require/provides without having to edit the > init scripts themselves. > This is half the problem, but the OpenVPN init script probably shouldn't

Re: [gentoo-user] What is the meaning of "mirror" URI scheme in ebuilds?

2018-03-27 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/27/2018 02:50 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Example from app-editors/emacs/emacs-24.5-r5 : > > SRC_URI="mirror://gnu/emacs/${P}.tar.xz > https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/emacs/${P}-patches-4.tar.xz; > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/635646

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is --changed-deps going to be *that* useless?

2018-02-27 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/27/2018 03:30 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > --with-bdeps=n. Once a package is installed, it doesn't matter what > happens to its build deps. FWIW, the rationale for enabling bdeps by default for "upgrade" actions is that the old build deps are already installed; so if there's a major

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is --changed-deps going to be *that* useless?

2018-02-27 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/27/2018 12:05 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > When I read this, I realize I don't understand the difference between > these two options. Or to be more accurate, I know that --deep means > looking at dependencies beyond the first level; but isn't that just a > superset of those found by

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is --changed-deps going to be *that* useless?

2018-02-26 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/26/2018 11:25 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > Of course, the real solution is revbumps whenever necessary, but > getting devs to do that seems to be impossible, as everybody wants to > assume that dynamic deps work. > We don't even need revbumps here. I'm sure there's a great historical

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is --changed-deps going to be *that* useless?

2018-02-26 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/26/2018 10:16 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Well, I'm on amd64, not ~amd64, and this morning portage wanted to remerge > 217 packages. Removing --changed-deps reduced that to one: sys-devel/llvm. > You do need to reinstall those. The latest (un)stable versions of automake are hard-coded

Re: [gentoo-user] openvpn client IP address

2018-01-18 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/17/2018 09:51 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > How openvpn client obtains IP address from the server? > > On the sever in server.conf I had: > server 192.168.139.0 255.255.255.0 > route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.139.7 > > On server in ccd/ I had client.file: > ifconfig-push

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel 4.14.7 no longer switches to VT7

2017-12-30 Thread Michael Orlitzky
It took a lot of work, but this latest kernel 14.4 enables support for machines with 128 pebibytes of RAM, up from the old limit of 256 TiB. On 12/30/2017 05:16 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > On my thinkpad, 4.14 crashes ... when I build audio support into it. But who uses that?

Re: [gentoo-user] How to harden a system

2017-12-25 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/23/2017 10:20 PM, Adam Carter wrote: > > So i'm wondering how much difference there is between hardened and > non-hardened profiles these days. > The hardened profiles ensure that PaX works by setting PAX_MARKINGS="XT" and by making sure that you don't disable xattr support in, say,

Re: [gentoo-user] How to harden a system

2017-12-23 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/23/2017 09:09 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > Now that grsecurity is off-limits, I'm left wondering how to go about > hardening a no-multilib box that will be exposed to the Big Bad World. You can still use grsec/pax if you're willing to stick with an older (LTS) kernel:

Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network

2017-12-19 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/19/2017 12:22 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > > There are; .local and .localhost are reserved TLDs. .local is reserved for Apple's multicast DNS stuff, which requires names to be resolved via a nonstandard method: Any DNS query for a name ending with ".local." MUST be sent to the mDNS IPv4

Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network

2017-12-19 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/18/2017 04:58 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > > I have used .localdomain for years without issue. VLANS > (wifi.localdomain, lan.localdomain etc.) are great if you have the > hardware to do it. > > Using non-official TLD internally shouldn't cause any problems (unless > someone is "stupid").

Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network

2017-12-19 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/18/2017 03:25 PM, David Haller wrote: > > ISTR, .localdomain is the new .local... > > BTW: I hate it how .local got ursurped by zeroconf/mDNS. > You were never allowed to use .local in the first place =P I learned some interesting things from RFC 8244, the first being that they have an

Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network

2017-12-18 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/18/2017 02:55 PM, Wol's lists wrote: > > My router defaults, iirc, to .local. And I thought .home also did the > same sort of thing. Both are reserved: the ".home" TLD is reserved for the Home Networking Control Protocol in the RFC 7788 that you cited, and ".local" is reserved for some

Re: [gentoo-user] CHOST missing in no-multilib stage3 make.conf

2017-12-18 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/18/2017 10:00 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > I tried a couple of different mirrors. No CHOST line. The example > file usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example shows... > > === > CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" > === > > I could insert that,

Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network

2017-12-18 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/18/2017 09:31 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> >> You should probably buy a TLD. It's stupid, but there are no reserved >> top-level domain names for internal use. > > What, for $185,000 plus quarterly fees[1]? No thanks. > > --->8 > I meant "buy a domain" there =) If somebody were to shell

Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network

2017-12-18 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/17/2017 09:05 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > I've been running Linux systems since 1994, calling my private LAN mynet > (bowdlerised). Now I come to install neth server on one machine, it insists > that I tell it a domain name with at least two dots in it. But I don't have >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again, emerge -e @world related questions...

2017-12-17 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/17/2017 06:45 AM, Melleus wrote: > After some digging in the files I commented out v3.4 line in > /etc/python-exec/python-exec.conf by hand and eselect then begins to > work as I expect. The question is that I think that I should not edit > that file by hand. So is it a bug or might I done

Re: [gentoo-user] Canary Pies

2017-12-17 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/16/2017 10:43 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > Hi, > > Currently I am scanning directories of my system with checksec to > identify relevant files of haveing "No PIE" or "No canary found" set. > > Is there any technical reason for which such files cannot be compiled > in a way so they have

Re: [gentoo-user] what gives with -O[x] in cflags?

2017-12-15 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/15/2017 09:11 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > 2) Firefox is the only application I run that crashes, and I don't > know how to disable -O3 to potentially make it more stable. Try USE=custom-optimization.

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc : autoload kernel modules

2017-12-14 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/14/2017 03:30 PM, David Haller wrote: > > Does openrc-run (or the old way) support adding to strings? I.e.: > > > modules+=" foo" > modules+=" bar" > > > or must one use > > > modules="${modules} foo" > modules="${modules} bar" > > > or must it even be one single

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc : autoload kernel modules

2017-12-14 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/14/2017 12:43 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > > I have added the following lines to  /etc/conf.d/modules > > modules="enhanceio" > modules="enhanceio_lru" > modules="enhanceio_fifo" > modules="enhanceio_rand" > "modules" is a variable name, and it's being overwritten on each line. The

Re: [gentoo-user] Why are these files restricted?

2017-12-13 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/10/2017 08:10 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > $ for f in /etc/at/at.deny /etc/cron.hourly/0anacron > /etc/default/useradd ; do > ls -l $f ; qfile $f ; > done > -rw-r- 1 root at 166 Dec 10 16:57 /etc/at/at.deny > sys-process/at (/etc/at/at.deny) > -rwxr-x--- 1 root root 392 Nov 4 21:04

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again, emerge -e @world related questions...

2017-12-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/08/2017 09:53 AM, Melleus wrote: > I had moved to v 17.0 profile mostly painless, though it was a time > consuming event. But I got one point anyway. Python in my system was > updated from 3.4 to 3.5 and after 3.4 was removed with depclean, the > option for v 3.4 in eselect python remains.

Re: [gentoo-user] setuptools (python) - how to disable the sandbox ?

2017-12-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/09/2017 11:43 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> >> I wouldn't mind the package to write to its own working directory > > That's not usually a problem... what phase is this in, and which command > in the ebuild raised the error? > And now that I've actuall

Re: [gentoo-user] setuptools (python) - how to disable the sandbox ?

2017-12-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/09/2017 11:17 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Hi, > I want to create an ebuild for a package that's not in the tree > (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/grako) > > Unfortunately, this always fails due to > >File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/setuptools/sandbox.py", > line 411, in

Re: [gentoo-user] Package version bump policy

2017-12-08 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/08/2017 07:06 AM, Alexey Eschenko wrote: > Hi guys. > > Some time ago PHP 7.2 was released. To start working with it I was > needed XDebug and it was released in "alpha" version: https://xdebug.org/ > > Is there any policy against version bumps for "alpha" versions or I can > create the

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: git, how to compare a repo with a loose tree

2017-12-07 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/07/2017 09:58 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I would like to use "git diff" to show differences between the > current state of a git repository and a normal directory tree somewhere > on the filesystem, ie. one without a .git subdirectory. This is proving > surprisingly hard to do. If "git

Re: [gentoo-user] preparing for profile switch -- major problem

2017-12-07 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/07/2017 09:04 AM, John Covici wrote: > > I have it set to 120 by default. > Um... try "emerge -uDN1 perl" instead of @world? The perl upgrade was tough, IIRC because it needed a large backtrack value to succeed. But back when the perl upgrade was "new", a @world update was simple

Re: [gentoo-user] preparing for profile switch -- major problem

2017-12-07 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/07/2017 12:44 AM, John Covici wrote: > Hi. In preparing for the profile switch and the emerge -e world, I > have run into a serious problem with perl. I think I saw on this list > where perl 5.26 was going to have problems -- maybe until it is > stabilized -- but if I mask it off, I get

Re: [gentoo-user] Again, emerge -e @world related questions...

2017-12-06 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/05/2017 04:13 PM, Mick wrote: > > I just noticed chromium shows (pic) in brackets, which I assume it means > forced. > Yep. That information is hidden deep down in the "emerge" man page... --verbose [ y | n ] (-v short option) Tell emerge to run in verbose mode. Currently this

Re: [gentoo-user] Sandbox violations when installing a Python package

2017-12-06 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/06/2017 11:09 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > > But then using this version of imapclient fails since it wants > dev-python/backports-ssl (from PyPi). > But dev-python/backports-ssl-0.0.9 doesn't install here before a name > clash with dev-python/backports-1.0. > And no, this version of

Re: [gentoo-user] Sandbox violations when installing a Python package

2017-12-06 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/06/2017 09:08 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Hi, > > I hope somebody can help me. > > I've written a new ebuild for "dev-python/imapclient-1.1.0" (the > latest version in the tree is version 0.13)... > > Ebuilding this packages dies of a Sandbox Violation: > Post the full build log and

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --info

2017-12-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/05/2017 09:31 PM, Adam Carter wrote: > Does the output reflect; > 1. What will be used for the next build > 2. What was used on the last successful build > 3. What was used on the last build attempt > > If its 1 or 3, then USE=custom-cflags does not work on firefox... Portage initializes

Re: [gentoo-user] Again, emerge -e @world related questions...

2017-12-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/05/2017 03:26 PM, Corbin wrote: > > In "packages" that throw out the "CFLAGS / CXXFLAGS" values in the > end-users "make.conf" and substitute their own ... how will that be handled? > The GCC ebuilds all use toolchain.eclass which is incomprehensible to me, but it looks like the default

Re: [gentoo-user] Again, emerge -e @world related questions...

2017-12-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/05/2017 11:00 AM, Corbin wrote: > > Does this mean that a "package" with no USE flag of PIE / PIC will be > built with the gcc switches  " -fpic / -fPIE " applied? > Yup. > Or is this the equivalent of putting the " PIE / PIC " USE flags in > make.conf? Nope.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Emerge does want to tell me...what?

2017-12-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/05/2017 05:23 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I've been waiting for shouts of horror at that suggestion, but all's quiet > so I'll see if I can remember how to set -fpic in the environment of > palemoon. I'd have expected the ebuild do that though. The upstream build system should already

Re: [gentoo-user] grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

2017-12-04 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/04/2017 09:13 PM, Daniel Frey wrote: > > Well, it copies from /usr/share/grub and /lib/grub to /boot/grub, and > the sum of those directories are 270M without any kernels, etc > installed. I guess I'm going to have to tarball everything up, > repartition, and untar it. > > I guess I'll

Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

2017-12-04 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/04/2017 12:48 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > On 12/03/2017 03:30 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> However, you can delay switching to the new profile for a while. > > For how long? > > eselect news item tells me: > > "Please migrate away from the

Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

2017-12-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/02/2017 09:32 PM, Adam Carter wrote: > > Does having the hardened USE flag enabled = having a hardened toolchain? If only it were that simple... what you really need to know is, did you build everything on your system with PIE enabled? * Some packages have "pie" USE flags, and it's only

Re: [gentoo-user] New profile 17: How urgent is the rebuild of world technically?

2017-12-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/02/2017 09:15 PM, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > Hi, > > the instruction of the news item about the swicth to profile 17 says > that one needs to rebuild @world. > > Is this technically needed? Yes, unless you were already using a hardened toolchain. > Would it be possible to do this on base

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

2017-12-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/02/2017 09:18 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: >> >> You do need to run "emerge -e @world", unless you happened to be using >> a hardened toolchain already. > > But only if you in fact switch the new profile on, right? Right. > There seems to be another thing afoot, though. All (or nearly so) >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

2017-12-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/02/2017 08:07 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Sat, 2 Dec 2017 18:33:09 -0500 > schrieb Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org>: > >> You're seeing a lot of reports because there is a news item telling >> people to switch to the new profile and run "emerge -e @world&qu

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub-0.97-r16 and profile 17.0 change

2017-12-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/02/2017 04:28 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > This profile change seems to have hit a few people in sensitive > locations. > > What is the upshot of this change? Can I eyeball the diff _before_ I > sync ? > The new 17.0 profile switches the default C++ version to C++14, and enables PIE/SSP by

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Just when is portage/bashrc sourced?

2017-11-27 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/27/2017 03:35 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > That came up in the OP, but the question was about doing it for selected > ebuilds, which is exactly what this must shorter option does. > You should update the wiki, your way is better.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Just when is portage/bashrc sourced?

2017-11-24 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/24/2017 12:07 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > Again IIRC, when I tried using env for a similar purpose, it didn't work > at all, it seemed the only things valid in those files were variable > assignments. Sounds about right... from `man portage`... package.env Per-package

Re: [gentoo-user] Just when is portage/bashrc sourced?

2017-11-23 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/23/2017 08:12 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Package P bypasses applying user patches (by not calling > default_src_prepare). I have patches I need to apply to P, and in this > case I really don't want to fork the ebuild. So, I'm hell bent on > doing it the hacky way with /etc/portage/bashrc

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: memset_s

2017-11-15 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/15/2017 10:50 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > Are you really sure? I was under the impression that ebuilds did it, > and I find that natural. I didn't view that as a bug at all. On principle, most things in the tree should respect whatever CFLAGS, LDFLAGS, etc. you ask for. The problems

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition

2017-11-01 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/01/2017 12:55 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > I actually run cronie, and AFAICT it has no built-in anacron-like > offline schedule support If you build cronie with USE=anacron, I think it also comes with an "anacron" executable:

Re: [gentoo-user] FYI: Daily / weekly / monthly cron jobs run twice on DST - non-DST transition

2017-10-29 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/29/2017 07:46 AM, Remy Blank wrote: > > I attached a patch to the bug, but considering how old the bug is, and > from the tone of the discussion there, I have little hope that it gets > applied. If you would like to see this fixed, it may be worth chiming in > on the bug. Or if you're a

Re: [gentoo-user] A portage nuisance

2017-10-28 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/28/2017 08:10 PM, Wols Lists wrote: > > In other words, I'm asking emerge to automate what I do - look at the > output, find a subset of packages that I think will work, and then ask > it to try again with just those packages. I would be very surprised if > it iterated repeatedly down to

Re: [gentoo-user] Where can I find "recent" qemu out-of-tree ebuild

2017-10-25 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/25/2017 09:24 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > What's with the big gap, and where can I find more > recent out-of-tree ebuilds? The big gap is because we stopped using CVS back then. Gitweb is being real slow right now, but you can usually browse around the tree at various commits to find old

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] emerge default opts

2017-10-19 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/15/2017 04:39 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On 10/14/2017 09:30 PM, Dale wrote: While at it. Is there a tool that tells when USE flags in make.conf is either no longer used or doesn't even exist anymore? >>> > > Or you could just use portpeek... > portpeek doesn't check

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: monit and friends.

2017-10-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/16/2017 11:50 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > What I need here is a small app that will be a constrained, > single-purpose watchdog. If a daemon fails, the watchdog attempts 3 > restarts to get it going, and records the fact it did it (that goes into > the big monitoring system as a reportable

Re: [gentoo-user] What's up with larry the cow dot org?

2017-10-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/16/2017 08:14 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > And it was never Larry the Cow either, gentoo had > Larry the Gender-Confused Cow :-) > Short for Loretta?

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] emerge default opts

2017-10-15 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/14/2017 09:30 PM, Dale wrote: > > While at it.  Is there a tool that tells when USE flags in make.conf is > either no longer used or doesn't even exist anymore? I don't know of one. It doesn't *sound* hard, but you would have to consider local use flags, flags from overlays, USE_EXPAND

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] emerge default opts

2017-10-14 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/14/2017 07:25 AM, Dale wrote: > > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--with-bdeps y ... You probably don't need this one any more... you'll have to consult a lawyer to figure out what `man emerge` says on the matter, but IIRC, the --with-bdeps-auto flag (enabled by default) now does the sensible thing,

Re: [gentoo-user] Borg 1.1 is out, when can we expect it in the repos?

2017-10-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/09/2017 12:55 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > If that is picked up by a developer, then yes. > My experience with providing bugs with ebuilds is that they get closed > eventually due to open security bugs (fixed in supplied versions for a few > years) and lack of maintainership. > If the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Multiple network interfaces and openrc

2017-09-20 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 09/20/2017 04:28 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-09-20, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > >> When I add multiple net.* services to a single runlevel (basic example: >> both a net.en* and a net.wl* service in default runlevel), it has a >> surprising and undesirable effect: when

Re: [gentoo-user] no more googleearth in portage

2017-09-20 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 09/20/2017 01:55 AM, Raffaele Belardi wrote: > I suppose it's due to Google's choice to support only Chrome https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624966

Re: [gentoo-user] Ruby - 3 versions - seriously????

2017-09-04 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 09/04/2017 01:07 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > > For almost all languages but Ruby (and Perl) you can take code written > against one minor version and compile it in the next minor version. This isn't a language issue with Ruby, it's a culture/package-management one. For a long time, it's been easy to

Re: [gentoo-user] systemD?

2017-08-30 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 08/30/2017 04:39 PM, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: > I do not want to start a whole systemd storm, glad i was offline for > that. however, in my case i'd really like to avoid systemd. can i > setup with out systemd, or do i need to remove and patch later. If you follow the

Re: [gentoo-user] Why does Java-Runtime want to print and X and all that?

2017-07-17 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 07/17/2017 09:52 AM, Matthias Hanft wrote: > > [ebuild N ] dev-java/icedtea-bin-3.4.0:8::gentoo USE="alsa cups > gtk webstart -doc -examples -headless-awt -multilib -nsplugin > -pulseaudio (-selinux) -source" ABI_X86="(64) -32 (-x32)" 60397 KiB Try turning off USE="gtk" and turning on

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox depends on rust??

2017-06-23 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 06/23/2017 01:15 AM, R0b0t1 wrote: > > I tried to reference that in my post. I tried to install the packages > that constitute the Haskell platform but cabal related utilities were > still firing off on their own. > The dev-haskell/cabal libraries are used in the build system of most haskell

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox depends on rust??

2017-06-22 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 06/22/2017 04:57 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: >> >> It would be against our ebuild policy if it does so. The sources for a >> package should be listed in SRC_URI and are downloaded and verified by >> your Gentoo package manager. After that, network access is forbidden. >> > > You might be interested in

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox depends on rust??

2017-06-22 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 06/22/2017 10:41 AM, R0b0t1 wrote: > > This is kind of troubling because much like Cabal it seems like the > Rust package management system is insecure. Does the Firefox build > process make use of it? > It would be against our ebuild policy if it does so. The sources for a package should be

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Apache config

2017-05-19 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 05/19/2017 04:31 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Or is that not what you meant? > > Maybe I need a different MPM. > That's what I meant. How about the AddOutputFilter INCLUDES line from my previous mail? Do you have that anywhere in your config, for the of the file that is trying to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Apache config

2017-05-18 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 05/18/2017 01:05 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2017-05-18 15:49, Peter Humphrey wrote: > >> The apache2 access log shows the files of the page being fetched, but >> makes no mention of /include/hmenu.incl, nor of includes at all. > > Don't you need to load a special module for server-side

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache config

2017-05-18 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 05/18/2017 10:49 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > While working on the new-old site I'm using my local mini-server, but I > can't find out why it's not obeying server-include commands. In the source I > have e.g. > > > ... > > > Options Indexes FollowSymLinks Includes >

Re: [gentoo-user] trying to find the cause of an http 500 error

2017-05-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 05/05/2017 08:31 AM, John Covici wrote: > > For owncloud, changing to http yields the same result. However, when > I finally changed the display_startup_errors to On, I get the > following fatal error: > [05-May-2017 11:44:21 UTC] PHP Fatal error: Maximum execution time of > 30 seconds

Re: [gentoo-user] trying to find the cause of an http 500 error

2017-05-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 05/05/2017 07:13 AM, John Covici wrote: > > The php log is not mentioned in the .htaccess file of owncloud. But > regardless of owncloud, php fatal errors are not logged anywhere under > apache, even though I have log_errors and a log file name. > Apache doesn't know anything about what

Re: [gentoo-user] trying to find the cause of an http 500 error

2017-05-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 05/05/2017 02:30 AM, John Covici wrote: > > In case of some crazy thing in owncloud turning off logging or > something, I wrote a program which triggers a fatal error (I know > it does using the cli) and ran it under apache and nothing is being > logged. > > So, the question is how to get it

Re: [gentoo-user] How do you manage manually compiled software?

2017-04-27 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 04/27/2017 09:33 PM, Danny YUE wrote: > Hi guys, > > I am compiling RISC-V tools...I am just curious how do you manage your > manually compiled software? Don't, write an ebuild for it.

Re: [gentoo-user] elibtoolize Portage patch requested, but failed to apply!

2017-03-27 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/27/2017 11:03 AM, Erwan RIGOLLOT wrote: Hi Thanks for you answer. Where can I file a bug? What's information is needed ? https://bugs.gentoo.org/ You should provide, * The last time you synced your portage tree. * The output from "emerge -pv1 ", where is the package that's

Re: [gentoo-user] elibtoolize Portage patch requested, but failed to apply!

2017-03-27 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/27/2017 07:41 AM, Erwan RIGOLLOT wrote: Does anyone have any idea what I could do? File a bug with as much information about your system as possible.

Re: [gentoo-user] Difficulty setting up apache, php and joomla

2017-03-26 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/26/2017 04:28 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: Pelican looks interesting; I may follow it up. I didn't say this before (one thing at a time, eh?) but I need to build a site that another choirman can take over from me at some time. That seems to rule out anything that smacks of script writing,

Re: [gentoo-user] Difficulty setting up apache, php and joomla

2017-03-25 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/25/2017 10:48 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: Hello list, I'm setting up a new little box to be a web development server, to develop a new website for my choir. I have it running with the old site, hand-crafted from HTML and CSS, but after installing joomla into the new site and on attempting

Re: [gentoo-user] cron tab

2017-03-21 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/22/2017 12:48 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Vixie cron (as well as cronie with USE=anacron) should run the job at the correct time. blarg, cronie with USE="-anacron", the anacron flag needs to be OFF.

Re: [gentoo-user] cron tab

2017-03-21 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/22/2017 12:42 AM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: You might be correct on my other system I have: sys-process/vixie-cron and the cron job is running at a wrong time as well. It just happen after recent upgrade. Vixie cron (as well as cronie with USE=anacron) should run the job at the

Re: [gentoo-user] cron tab

2017-03-21 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/21/2017 11:48 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: Which cron program are you using? For example, anacron and fcron will attempt to run "missed" jobs. System time is correct. I'm running: sys-process/cronie sys-process/cronbase I'll try to switch to sys-process/vixie-cron Don't

Re: [gentoo-user] cron tab

2017-03-21 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/21/2017 11:13 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: https://crontab.guru/#5_18_3_*_1-5 “At 18:05 on day-of-month 3 and on every day-of-week from Monday through Friday.” So it shouldn't run today! Which cron program are you using? For example, anacron and fcron will attempt to run

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-flto" supported by Gentoo?

2017-03-21 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/21/2017 10:20 PM, P Levine wrote: Does Gentoo support the "-flto" flag and are "-flto" related bugreports valid? Sure. If the upstream package needs major changes, then the report probably won't go anywhere, but it's still nice to have a record of the problem. Maybe start a [TRACKER]

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm not updating with @world

2017-03-04 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/04/2017 10:18 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > So, that will bring in the update, just like emerge -1a sys-devel/llvm > will. > > But, why isn't --deep @world doing so? Is it bug-reporting time? > > (There is one other slight possible anomoly I could find: > 'equery depends sys-devel/llvm'

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm not updating with @world

2017-03-04 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/04/2017 09:37 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > Michael, thanks for your response. No, I did not do a one-shot; llvm > was brought in by way of mesa -> gallium; this is llvm's only use on > this system as far as I know. > > Also, 'emerge -ac' shows no packages to remove. > Well, there goes

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm not updating with @world

2017-03-04 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/04/2017 06:38 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > Hi all - I'm running a systemd/hardened desktop with > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64". > The result of an 'emerge -auDN --with-bdeps=y --complete-graph @world' is > 'Nothing to merge; quitting.' > > However, if I 'emerge -1a sys-devel/llvm', I get: >

Re: [gentoo-user] ifconfig - display/list hostname with IP address

2017-03-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/02/2017 03:57 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > running "ifconfig" is it possible to display hostname, especially with > "tun" interfaces. > > It would be easier to recognize which network is Up or Down. > The closest thing I was able to manage is # ip -r addr show

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-lang/php-5.6

2017-02-27 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/27/2017 03:14 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > When will they drop the dev-lang/php-5.6.30 from the portage? > > php-7.0 is not working with my application (modification are too > intensive) besides I'm not a programmer. > The php-5.6 series will receive security updates until the end

Re: [gentoo-user] Dependecy problem: PortgreSQL twice

2017-02-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/09/2017 08:27 AM, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > > The use flag "postgresql" is _not_ set. Deinstalling pgadmin3 > did not help. > > Besides that, masking 9.5 helps. Yet, it doesn't tell > _where_ the dependency arises from. > A wild guess: you keyworded a specific version of postgresql:9.6 in

Re: [gentoo-user] SOT (Slightlt OffTopic): Scriptable Documentation system (HTML/PDF) ?

2017-02-07 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/07/2017 01:59 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi, > > to create documentation about changes in the > contents of releases, of the installation > instruction and in system requirements I need > a system, which is scriptable and therefore > automatable. > > Current state is to make or

Re: [gentoo-user] openVPN

2017-02-06 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/06/2017 09:53 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I'm trying to configure "openvpn" on my new box (have done it in the > past - long time ago). > > Trying to follow some basic instruction but when I change to: > cd /usr/share/easy-rsa/ > > and try to run: ./build-ca > bash: ./build-ca: No

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server / apache

2017-02-04 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/04/2017 01:25 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > Do I need to block php-5.6.30 nagios-core-4.2.4 nagios-4.2.4 as well? > You probably don't nee to mask PHP, but you will need to mask nagios-4.x. Be warned, though: as soon as some unrelated package gets a keyword update, nagios-3.x

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

2017-01-29 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/29/2017 03:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). > I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems. > Ugh, you're in for it. The ncurses update requires --backtrack=100 or something like that.

Re: [gentoo-user] Which is the Gentoo default? Openssl or Libressl?

2017-01-24 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/24/2017 10:38 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote: > Hi all, > Title says it all. I think I've managed to screw things up, a USE flag > here, a USE flag there - what's a USE flag between fiends sort of thing. > I want to sort things out and I know at one time or another I think I've > dabbled in

Re: [gentoo-user] The final of free software

2017-01-08 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/08/2017 11:56 AM, Dominus Mundi wrote: > as allowed by the Medical Silvodisis act recently -- I mean recently > for my time -- passed by the interfalactic council. Is that an ex-post-facto law? If not, can't you just travel back in time and get high and then travel forwards again? Asking

Re: [gentoo-user] Bringing mdocml to Gentoo, MANPATH woes

2017-01-04 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/04/2017 10:21 AM, Wolfgang Mueller wrote: > > I post this on the -user list because it seems to me that I have issues > relating to several distinct components. If this is better discussed > somewhere else, I would appreciate some pointers :) Try the -dev list for the MANPATH thing. > >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >