Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, at 13:22, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:> interestingly, RH (and Centos) have both dumped systemd and gone to > another system (I don't remember which one). In fact they've done so > retroactively on earlier versions. Of course the continuing take over > of

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 06:35:16PM +, Wols Lists wrote: On 07/12/17 09:52, Richard Bradfield wrote: I did also investigate USB3 external enclosures, they're pretty fast these days. AARRGGH !!! If you're using mdadm, DO NOT TOUCH USB WITH A BARGE POLE !!! I don't know the details

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6

On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, at 09:28, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > I incorporated ZFS' expansion inflexibility into my planned > > maintenance/servicing budget. > > What was the conclusion? That having no more free slots meant that you > can just as well use the inflexible Raidz, otherwise would have

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 06:35:10PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: I don’t really care about performance. It’s a simple media archive powered by the cheapest Haswell Celeron I could get (with 16 Gigs of ECC RAM though ^^).

Re: [gentoo-user] Problems copmiling firefox 57.0 (linking phase)

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:15:18AM +0100, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote: It doesn't fail at the last stage - that's just when the error is repeated after other parallel tasks in the pipeline are completed. The actual error you got starts around line 5520 and is: --- stderr thread '' panicked at