Re: [gentoo-user] ruby gems versus emerge
Thufir wrote: I installed the fastercsv gem via gems rather than emerge :( From http://packages.gentoo.org/category/dev-ruby?full_cat I don't even see that package listed. Are gems supposed to be installed via emerge? Yes. There's a gems eclass that handles installing gems, making gems-ebuils fairly easy. Have a look at, for example, the dev-ruby/camping ebuild. Oh, and there's an ebuild request (bug #209319) for dev-ruby/fastercsv, including an ebuild submission. Just get it and put it in your local overlay (or set one up, if you haven't already) :). Cheers, thomas -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] /usr/bin/qt3to4 ?
maxim wexler wrote: 2. Be sure that your code compiles and runs well on all your target platforms with Qt 3. How? Complile and test. I can't understand your problem... What is qmake, it's not in portage. .pro file? What makefile? It's in portage, comes with Qt. http://doc.trolltech.com/4.3/qmake-manual.html Recompile with? What does one recompile? The application you're porting?! Not sure what you're trying to do, but you should probably learn some of this stuff before. Maybe you can give a little more precise information? Cheers, thomas -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.0
Mantas Povilaitis wrote: AFAIK 4.0.0 will not be unmasked. Only 4.0.1 (or 4.1?). yep. from gentoo-dev: Wulf C. Krueger wrote: Carsten Lohrke wrote: The code base has too many issues and is incomplete compared to KDE 3.5, so it's not ready to push it to the regular ~arch user, yet. I didn't mean hard-masked. I've reconsidered, though, and seeing the new timeline upstream published for the 4.0.1, I agree. We'll see about 4.0.1's quality... Thus, KDE 4.0.0 is going to go in hard-masked. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
