Re: [gentoo-user] Arduino development on GENTOO Linux

2016-04-30 Thread Ming-Che Lee
can use it for you arduino project also! Thank you for the infos! Best regards, Ming-Che

Re: [gentoo-user] Arduino development on GENTOO Linux

2016-04-30 Thread Ming-Che Lee
hted commands in the IDE correctly. So I downloaded IDE 1.6.8 and unzipped it in /opt. Next step was to run the installer $ /opt/arduino-1.6.8/install.sh To start IDE 1.6.8: /opt/arduino-1.6.8/arduino or via menu item. Hope this helps. Beste regards, Ming-Che

[gentoo-user] Re: SAR vs collectl

2012-08-30 Thread che
James writes: > Is SAR quickly available for Gentoo (an overlay I missed)? > Is there a better (more robust/graphical/etc) package > to use in lieu of SAR? > sar is in app-admin/sysstat -- Christer

[gentoo-user] Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?

2012-03-28 Thread che
"Mike Edenfield" writes: > > Yes , of course it's /possible/, it's just not /practical/. Perhaps, but still? I don't se how that is less practical than collecting them to a ramdisk? Just do exactly the same steps up to the "cpio | gzip" -part I do agree with most of what you say > > Most Linux

[gentoo-user] Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?

2012-03-28 Thread che
Alan McKinnon writes: > > I offer you two choices: > > a. Move a few commands into an initramfs, truly only the ones you > really do need, or > b. Move 7G of files onto / (i.e. everything) and lose any benefit you > (and everyone else with different ideas to you) may want by having a > separate /u

[gentoo-user] Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?

2012-03-27 Thread che
Neil Bothwick writes: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:26:46 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > >> > As you move more and more software off of /usr into / you start to >> > realize that the idea of "tiny partition that contains just what I >> > need to boot and mount /usr" is becoming "not so tiny" anymore.

[gentoo-user] Re: Limit number of cores used by emerge?

2011-09-30 Thread che
Mark Knecht writes: > Hi, >Is there a portage option that will limit the number of cores used > by emerge? For instance, in a chroot on a 12 core machine I want to > limit emerge to not using more than 3 cores? I don't think there is a portage option for that. Perhaps you could use schedtool

[gentoo-user] Re: linux-headers-2.6.38

2011-08-11 Thread che
Nikos Chantziaras writes: > > glibc will use things in newer kernels anyway. You don't need to use > NPTL_KERN_VER=2.6.38 in order for glibc to use 2.6.38 features; it > will do that by default. NPTL_KERN_VER only omits fallbacks for older > kernels. It's there to reduce the size of glibc. Th

[gentoo-user] Re: linux-headers-2.6.38

2011-08-10 Thread che
Pandu Poluan writes: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 20:02, wrote: >> Also, beware. If you recompile glibc withe NPTL_KERN_VER set, you can't >> boot with older kernels anymore. >> > > Can you explain what did you mean with "older kernels"? Kernels older > than a certain version, or a previously-compi

[gentoo-user] Re: linux-headers-2.6.38

2011-08-10 Thread che
Pandu Poluan writes: > While I'm about to do an `emerge -e @world` ... > > Should I `emerge -av "=sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.38" ` ? > > Any benefits over the current "sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.36.1" ? There is at least a theoretical benifit if you set NPTL_KERN_VER=2.6.38 in make.conf and

[gentoo-user] Re: How's the openrc update going for everyone?

2011-05-12 Thread che
Peter Humphrey writes: > On Wednesday 11 May 2011 22:14:55 Mike Edenfield wrote: > >> The only problem with LC_ALL is that it overrides all of the other LC_* >> variables. > > - which is precisely what most ordinary desktop users want. Most perhaps, but certainly not all. For me it's important t

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT crypto] How to encrypt a directory without root?

2010-01-01 Thread Ming-Che Lee
Hi, On Friday 01 January 2010 19:32:07 Harry Putnam wrote: > I want to encrypt a directory heirarchy on a remote machine where > I don't have root. I can use either an openbsd, or gentoo > remote. > Maybe of some help: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9880 Regards, Ming-Che

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE without aRts?

2005-12-31 Thread Ming-Che Lee
Hi, Am Sonntag, 1. Januar 2006 00:18 schrieb Dimitar Toshev: > On Saturday 31 December 2005 22:49, Ming-Che Lee wrote: > > Am Samstag, 31. Dezember 2005 21:27 schrieb Abhay Kedia: > > > Also, I like to use JuK as my audio player and use Skype > > > extensively. Wil

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE without aRts?

2005-12-31 Thread Ming-Che Lee
r to work properly. I think I read it somewhere in the installation requirements of Skype. Prior to Skype I didn't have artsd enabled in KDE and there were no troubles. Regards, Ming-Che Lee -- Registered Linux User #241507 at http://counter.li.org GPG KEYID: 0x5EBF1692 Fingerprint: DB76