On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 02:18:37 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> > Is it possible to add it to your hosts file and point it to local
> > IP?
>
> No. Because the name is rsync://rsync.us.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage.
> > Obviously, if it is a numbered IP then this like
rtage/repos.conf/ Namely localrepo.conf
> and layman.conf. Now what? Sorry, I'm not trolling. It's painful
> when you RTFM, and TFM is out to lunch.
I have this in gentoo.conf:
[DEFAULT]
main-repo = gentoo
[gentoo]
priority = 20
location = /var/portage
sync-type = rsync
sync-uri = rsync://my.local.
nf:
>
> [DEFAULT]
> main-repo = gentoo
>
> [gentoo]
> priority = 20
> location = /var/portage
> sync-type = rsync
> sync-uri = rsync://my.local.mirror/portage
> auto-sync = yes
> sync-rsync-verify-metamanifest = no
>
> I can't recall where this file came
is root:root. Should the ownership be portage:portage? What
> > is the default?
>
> As it happens, I switched a machine from rsync to git syncing last night,
> so started with a new tree. Everything is root:root. That implies that
> portage does not drop permissions for the sync, o
is root:root. Should the ownership be portage:portage? What
is the default?
As it happens, I switched a machine from rsync to git syncing last night,
so started with a new tree. Everything is root:root. That implies that
portage does not drop permissions for the sync, otherwise it wouldn't be
able
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:08:08 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> If you are using rsync or cp -u you could start the copy then stop at it
>> certain points to let the SSD cool, then start it again. It will
>> basically pick up where it left off.
> Don't
I'd like to keep my "hot backup" machine more up-to-date. The most
important directory is my home directory. So far, I've been doing
occasional tarballs of my home directory and pushing them over. I
exclude some directories for "reasons". I'd like to switch to rsync
a
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 4:28 PM n952162 wrote:
>
> On 2020-06-11 22:01, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Try:
> > USE="python_targets_python3_6 -python_targets_python3_7 -rsync-verify"
> > emerge -p1v =sys-apps/portage-2.3.99-r2
> >
>
> Sorry, try again.
>
On 2020-12-28 11:28+ Michael wrote:
> I noticed this error coming up today, on different rsync mirrors:
>
> ~ # eix-sync && emerge -uaNDv world
>
> * Running emerge --sync
> >>> Syncing repository 'gentoo' into '/usr/portage'...
> * Using ke
On 22/10/2023 09:50, Dale wrote:
I've read about using rsync as a daemon. It is supposed to be faster.
For some reason, I just never got around to trying it. It would likely
be a good idea to work on that. It would likely be really handy when
moving large amounts of data. I may try to read
On 27/04/2022 16:18, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:22 AM Grant Edwards
wrote:
Is there any advantage (either to me or the Gentoo community) to
continue to use rsync and the rsync pool instead of switching the
rest of my machines to git?
I've been very impressed
Sebastiaan L. Zoutendijk wrote:
> Dear Dale,
>
> On Friday 2 September 2022, 3.35am -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> time rsync -auv --progress --delete /home/dale/Desktop/Crypt/Video/*
>> /mnt/10tb/Video/
> What is going on here is due to a subtle interplay of rsync’s syntax and
.x to portage-2.1.x, you
need to run `emerge --metadata`.
Zac
Here it is what I did for the record. On my local rsync server I set
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS in /etc/make.conf as in /etc/make.globals but removed
--filter=...
Then, still on my local rsync server I did an emerge --sync so the
digest
on the device I get 3 icons NFS SMB HTTP
If I click on SMB the location changes to smb://device.homenet.com and I can
copy any files I want - even links seem to work
I'm sure there must be a simple answer to this
Paul
Paul Stear wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to rsync to a remote server
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 12:21:40PM -0500, Randy Westlund wrote:
I've been using rsync to sync binary files, shell scripts, my
workspace, and random user files under my home directory across
multiple machines. I'm using one server as the master copy, which
makes daily incremental backups of my
conversion to the new order? Can someone please
post a bog-standard example... *WITHOUT* inheriting a gazillion eclasses
and/or cascading multiple overlays?
The SYNC statement in my make.conf is...
SYNC=rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage
My /etc/portage directory
y/www-client/seamonkey/seamonkey-2.53.10.2-r2.ebuild
>
> Cheers,
> Arve
>
>
I was going to add the overlay but I get this error:
root@fireball / # layman -a poly-c
* Adding overlay...
* Running Rsync... # /usr/bin/rsync -rlptDvz --progress --delete
--delete-after --timeou
David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was thinking on making regular backup of my gentoo partition. I'm not
interested in incremental backups, just a mirror image of the root
filesystem. I've prepared some scripts using dd for the first copy and
rsync to keep it updated. How do you
for the job,
but IMO not the best tool available. Instead I'd suggest to use rsync.
Reason: It's easier to restore just a single file.
It's of course possible to restore single files from tar-balls as well,
but it's more complicated. Especially, if you're using incrementals. I'm
not saying that's
Am Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2008 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
rsync is good, but has its own disadvantages, notably the lack of
compression and the reliance on the destination filesystem to preserve
permissions.
Can you elaborate more on the latter, please? What exactly is rsync relying
on and which
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 7 May 2008 09:57:02 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
rsync is good, but has its own disadvantages, notably the lack of
compression and the reliance on the destination filesystem to preserve
permissions.
Can you elaborate more on the latter
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:32:18 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
I had just moved, and was busy setting up my new condo,
[snip]
It was a major struggle. emerge --sync stopped working. I manually
selected a different rsync server, and got the same error messages. I
gave up and used webrsync.
Did
librsync, so may be of interest to you.
http://rdiff-backup.nongnu.org/
If you ignore the 'rdiff-backup-data' folder it creates then it's more or
less
identical to using rsync alone.
Thanks, I'll have a look at it.
Did you have to do anything special to make it work from cron?
Cheers,
Roger
Shawn Haggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roger Mason wrote:
I have passwordless ssh between mymachine and backup_machine and the
rsync command in the crontab runs perfectly from the command line.
Does someone know what else needs to be done to get this (seemingly
simple!) task to work
W.Kenworthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roger Mason wrote:
I have passwordless ssh between mymachine and backup_machine and the
rsync command in the crontab runs perfectly from the command line.
Does someone know what else needs to be done to get this (seemingly
simple!) task to work
still need to exclude everything under it?.
Neil has handled this... I wanted to include the rsync syntax to
collect only directories... full or empty:
So to collect all the directories regardless of your excludes
put this before any excludes:
--include=/**/
The trailing slash confines
Hello,
After using emerge-webrsync I got
Updating Portage cache: 100%
*** Completed websync, please now perform a normal rsync if possible.
Update is current as of the of MMDD: 20090219
I am not sure what the message means perform a normal rsync if
possible. I used emerge
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:39:01 +0100, Geralt wrote:
If it's just for data, I'm making a daily backup on a flash disk using
rsync and from time to time a backup on an external hdd drive using
again rsync. If you tar it up, you can't store the differences only
anymore, so you have to decide first
Hello,
When I have not sync'd in over a month or so and when I ran:
emerge --sync
It basically shows the motd of the remote rsync server and then times out.
I have let it run for a bit and try multiple servers and it just keeps
timing out after the motd regardless of which server it goes
Maybe not a direct solution, but does a web-sync work ?
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 00:09, Matthew Closson wrote:
Hello,
When I have not sync'd in over a month or so and when I ran:
emerge --sync
It basically shows the motd of the remote rsync server and then times out.
I have let it run
some humor at our expense.?
PS (please don't take it seriously, as it's _HUMOR)
awe, 5 minutes later, it's 51%.but we have 'speedup'.
speedup relates to the transfer of the files via rsync, not the metadata
processing.
Thats why it comes straight after the files have been transferred
, the --progress option for rsync. emerge --sync calls
rsync with this option. It seems a bit pointless for emerge --sync, where
the files are so small there isn't time to show progress information
find /usr/portage/ -size +100k only finds four files.
--
Neil Bothwick
Smoking Can Damage Your Health
server will not let me have a user called root so I have set
user paul with the 'can do anything' previlege.
The mount and rsync commands are using user root
What file systems are involved?
You get a similar message writing to NSFS or fat since unix like
permisions are not supported
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:42:20 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I assume you meant 'cp -ax' :P
I did, it's tar that uses -l for this.
rsync -ax / /root/hd/
Well, /root/hd is empty so there's nothing to win with rsync other than
it being slower than cp. But it does the job too, anyway
but keep the CD
folder out of it completely. How should I do this?
- Grant
The thing that jumps to me immediately is rsync with a --exclude=CD
Man, rsync is easy to use. I imagined something else. Would
rsnapshot be useful in this case? What are the advantages of using a
daemon instead
* Grant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13.08.08 03:31]:
Man, rsync is easy to use. I imagined something else.
Try Bakula with a robotarm tape changer to keep the two things in
sync... ;-)
Would rsnapshot be useful in this case?
Defacto rsnapshot is just an elaborate wrapper around rsync...
What
Am Donnerstag 27 November 2008 06:20:47 schrieb ext Kaushal Shriyan:
I have a directory logfiles and inside it it has lots of sub directories.
Inside it there are lots of .gz, .txt and .sql files
I want only .sql files to be rsynced to the destination host
man rsync, lookup --include.
HTH
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:24:23 +0100, damian wrote:
rsync -a --delete --relative --exclude '/home' / /mnt/wd-backups/
That will also backup virtual filesystems like /proc, /dev and/sys. Add
the -x option to avoid
on 12/14/2008 11:11 PM damian wrote the following:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:24:23 +0100, damian wrote:
rsync -a --delete --relative --exclude '/home' / /mnt/wd-backups/
That will also backup virtual
with
# cp -a /source /dest
There is one slight disadvantage to cp in that it changed the modified
time of directories to the current time, which rsync does not. I'd use
rsync -ax /source/ /dest/
--
Neil Bothwick
If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
will get the exact same result with
# cp -a /source /dest
There is one slight disadvantage to cp in that it changed the modified
time of directories to the current time, which rsync does not. I'd use
rsync -ax /source/ /dest/
I made a note of that command and will give that a try. I'll
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:34:28 -0600, Dale wrote:
rsync -ax /source/ /dest/
I made a note of that command and will give that a try. I'll also read
the man page to see how to get it to skip /dev /sys /proc etc etc.
That's what the -x
After a lot of testing and testing of different methods to make backups I
reached a conclution of what I need, but I don't know if it's possible.
I want to do an rsync of the server directories I want but locally, it should
end up in a tared file (it doesn't need to be compressed). I need
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, John Jolet wrote:
Yes, I read that man page quite a bit. I have written a script that uses from
the command line rsync --rsh=ssh -l username server::module/files
successfully. However, changing the SYNC line in make.conf to
rsync://[EMAIL PROTECTED] give me a connection
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 19:41 -0500, Dave Nebinger wrote:
I guess really what I'm saying is no, it is not a good idea. There's plenty
of other backup solutions out there that would work better than this scheme.
If you have a server and space for the file, rsync would even be a better
PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS in /etc/make.conf, but
rsync doesn't appear to have an option to change this output, only
suppress it.
You can also override PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS (the defaults are set
in /etc/make.globals) in make.conf. What you cannot do is change the binary
that it uses (/usr/bin/rsync
Michael Sullivan wrote:
/etc/inti.d/mysql stop
rsync -av --delete /var/lib/mysql/ newbox01:/var/lib/mysql/
And this method will preserve all granted permissions with their
passwords? That would be great!
It would. I've been moving mysql the very same way on my bsd boxes. Just
stopped
using rsync -a to doing this job.
but if you have any doubt... the manual is your friend. ;)
man tar
man rsync
man cp
[]'s
.m
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
as possible)
Is cp -a sufficient ?
I always use rsync for this, it preserves directory timestamps, which cp
does not, and can be stopped and restarted if necessary.
rsync -ax(v) /mnt/oldpartition/ /mnt/newpartition/
The trailing slashes matter!
--
Neil Bothwick
Use Colgate toothpaste
it cannot detect alsa module setting,so it use all. but my alsa is not use a module,it in the kernel.
!!! Rsync has not successfully finished. It is recommended that you keep
!!! trying or that you use the 'emerge-webrsync' option if you are unable
!!! to use rsync due to firewall or other restrictions
from there, but of course, I can't emerge
anything . . .
The timeout-things - that's a stupid rsync problem.
Update rsync to the latest release. Perhaps it helps.
There used to be some webrsync-mechanism by running:
emerge-webrsync
Greetings
Sven
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Wed, June 29, 2005 5:08 am, Ow Mun Heng said:
I do, however, intend to test rdiff-backup later. ;)
Well.. there is more than one way to skin the cat eh.
I still think you should take a look at rsync.
rdiff-backup uses librsync, so it only transfers the minimum necessary.
Unlike rsync
A. Khattri ajai at bway.net writes:
Is there a script to update workstation systems, automatically,
say 10 minutes after booting? How best to do this?
I run this in my servers at 3am (they sync off a local rsync server,
similar to your setup):
http://www.panhorst.com/glcu/
This looks
locations of course)
Ben Blount
Wouldn't rsync -a be better for this, or would cp -R preserve ownership
and permissions as well?
cp -a would preserve all file attributes. rsync would probably be
better.
--
Hilsen Harald.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi guys,
I'm just curious about something. I've noticed many people report
problems with their repository syncing simply because someone was in
the middle of committing to the repository. Couldn't this be resolved
by replacing the syncing mechanism with *svn* as opposed to rsync?
After all
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:47:24 +0200
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
I am looking for a faster way to do a
cp -a r thisdir thatdir
locally on one machine with one harddisk inside.
rsync can parallel some of the tasks, like creating paths while files
are being copied, so I guess it wouldn't
On 15 Mar 2010, at 17:08, David W Noon wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:00:02 +0100, Willie Wong wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] what's wrong with rsync 3.0.6?:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:15:08PM +, David W Noon wrote:
You run your emerge --sync jobs by hand?!!!
Why is that surprising
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 20:22 -0700, Kaddeh wrote:
Are you doing a full recursive copy of / from rootfs for sdd7 (aka cp
-r /) if so, are the other partitions mounted as well?
[snip]
yes, but the rsync command -x or --one-file-system should stop rsync
traversing to different mounts so (I hope
On Sunday 27 June 2010 12:15:50 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
is there yet a way to get the portage tree directly via git ?
IMHO this should be more traffic efficient than rsync in the
long run (especially when syncing often).
I sometimes wonder whether I should file a feature request on rsync
Hi folks...
I've been thinking about switching from a rsync based tree to a git
based one cloning [0]. The main reasons because I would do that is in
order to save bandwidth (I've a slow GSM connection in my netbook and
I sync two other gentoo boxes from the first one) and maybe time.
So here
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com writes:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:59 on Wednesday 17 November 2010, James
did
opine thusly:
Hello,
I have a ~250 gig sata disk I want to migrate to a 2T
Sata disk. This is simple, but, I have a few caveats.
[...]
Now just rsync everything
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 00:54:36 +0100, Pau Peris wrote:
Hi, i'm doing a backup of a windows installation using rsync.
Everything is working fine except for symlinks, the problem is that
symlinks are taking absolute path so they're going to be broken as
soon a paths get changed.
app-misc
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to rsync all the directories and files that contain the date
2011.03.03.
Everything else should not be copied.
I did a lot of experiments
actual approach would be to set up the laptop as an rsync mirror, then:
laptop $ emerge --sync
(connect laptop to null-internet box via crossover cable + sync from laptop)
nointernet $ emerge --sync
nointernet $ emerge -pvfuDN world getfile
(copy getfile to laptop, move laptop to delicious bandwidth
, so I was wondering if anyone is using it and how it
works
for you?
I use good ole' rsync, together with a couple of scripts. It does the
hard link-style incrementals and I can do a near-bare-metal restore.
From that. rsync is still maintained afaik.
/ /mnt/root
rsync -avx /mnt/root user@remote.server:/backup/
True, this takes care of the /dev folder problem, but there's a
downside: if you have for example /var on a different partition, it
won't get backup up. This goes for mount --bind and also for rsync -x
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:03 PM, m...@trausch.us m...@trausch.us wrote:
rsync works just fine with any normal set of options when using any sort
of FAT as a destination. There are, of course, a couple of gotchas:
- FAT has limitations on file sizes.
- FAT cannot store permissions or ACLs
? The hardware? If you have a new PC, you simply need
to transfer your Gentoo install to a new hard disk using rsync.
He borked his /usr/include due to an improperly-written uninstall rule
in a Makefile.
Oh. That's pretty easy to fix though. Install a new Gentoo in a
chroot, and then rsync
My backup user needs a shell on the backup server in order to execute
rsync and needs to be included in /etc/ssh/sshd_config AllowUsers in
order to SSH in. My authorized_keys file is locked-down. The second
field for the user in /etc/shadow is an exclamation point which I
think means
.
Sorry if I am maybe a bit OT (am I?):
I often cloned systems from or into VMs by booting both systems with
live-CDs, mounting their disks and rsync -av the root-fs over ...
sure, taking care of dev/sys/proc/tmp does not hurt ...
After the rsync maybe some fstab-editing, checking grub-config
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 07:36:35PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
What is the best way to transfer multi-GB-files in LAN? I don't really
need encryption here ...
Did not mention rsync has:
-n, --dry-run perform a trial run with no changes made
as well as many other options
Am 30.09.2013 19:46, schrieb Bruce Hill:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 07:36:35PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
What is the best way to transfer multi-GB-files in LAN? I don't really
need encryption here ...
Did not mention rsync has:
-n, --dry-run perform a trial run
The 01/10/13, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I used split and tar to split the image-file into 100 MB parts and rsync
them over right now.
Maybe I have something wrong in my kernel ... the server shows a load of
around 3 ... while only the rsync is running and my mosh-session
There are 3 (or more) computers which sync (sometimes daily) on my LAN at
work: server, router, and workstation. server has issues almost all the time
getting a rsync server (for lack of better way to state it). All three comps
have the exact same SYNC in make.conf:
mingdao@server ~ $ grep SYNC
On 01/10/2013 16:20, Bruce Hill wrote:
There are 3 (or more) computers which sync (sometimes daily) on my LAN at
work: server, router, and workstation. server has issues almost all the time
getting a rsync server (for lack of better way to state it). All three comps
have the exact same SYNC
On Sunday 13 Oct 2013 00:07:56 Thanasis wrote:
on 10/12/2013 05:40 PM gottl...@nyu.edu wrote the following:
copy the lvm partitions to directories on an external disk (ext3)
What command did you use for copying?
You can use rsync, scp or (s)tar.
Personally I prefer star with the copy
for copying?
cp -ax
rsync not is on the minimal install.
rsync is on my 2013 amd-x64 minimal install CD. Do you have an amd-x64
install and do you have the latest version of the minimal install CD?
I do have amd64, but not 2013.
allan
Am 06.01.2014 17:16, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 06.01.2014 16:40, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:31:55 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
How to migrate? dd isn't recommended, right?
rsync the partitions one by one? But one of them is encrypted
...
Set up a new
On Saturday 08 Mar 2014 11:13:29 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 08 Mar 2014 10:42:08 Mick wrote:
I just tried my weekly rsync and it failed to find the server:
...
Have you come across the same problem recently?
Yes, I get the same. It worked all right at 04:20 but not now.
Thanks
On Saturday 08 Mar 2014 11:33:15 Mick wrote:
On Saturday 08 Mar 2014 11:13:29 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 08 Mar 2014 10:42:08 Mick wrote:
I just tried my weekly rsync and it failed to find the server:
...
Have you come across the same problem recently?
Yes, I get the same
Am 18.09.2014 um 18:44 schrieb Joseph:
I want to run a cron job only once a month. The problem is the computer is
only on on weekdays Mon-Fri. 1-5
cron tab as this below is an or condition as it has entries in Days of the
Months and Day of the Week
5 18 1 * 2 rsync -av ...
so
Hi Joseph!
Am 05.02.2015 um 20:19 schrieb Joseph:
I have a cron tab entry:
8 12 1-7 * 1 rsync ...
From `man 5 crontab`:
Note: The day of a command's execution can be specified by two fields —
day of month, and day of week. If both fields are restricted (ie,
aren't *), the command
On 02/05/15 08:49, Philip Webb wrote:
150501 Alec Ten Harmsel recommended:
[gentoo]
location = /usr/portage
sync-type = rsync
sync-uri = rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage
auto-sync = true
I don't have the final line : what is it for ?
It means that your local copy
Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote:
> Simon Thelen <gentoo-u...@c-14.de> wrote:
> > I sync from git and none of my Manifests track the ebuilds, so this
> > could be a thing.
>
> No. git has (probably, I didn't check)
> thin-manifests = true
> in
> My settings:
>
> make.conf.
> ...
> PORTDRI_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
1. PORTDIR_OVERLAY
2. It is no longer used, overlays should be declared at repos.conf
these days.
> cat /etc/portage/repos.conf/gentoo.conf
> [DEFAULT]
> main-repo = gentoo
>
> [gentoo]
> loca
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Holger Hoffstätte
<holger.hoffstae...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> After today's update to ~portage-2.2.21 rsync gives more more than I
> asked for on repo update; it seems rsync_excludes is no longer read
> or observed.
On 06.10.2015 15:00, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> stupid me. this does NOT copy the subvols over as I assumed.
>
> I tried to rsync the root-subvol ... but there are no subvols created by
> rsync.
Ok, done so far.
I took the btrfs-replace road with the risk ... I had to use "
»Q« <boxc...@gmx.net> wrote:
> eix-sync
Which method do you use for syncing (rsync, git, ...)?
> I've run 'emerge --metadata' and 'eix-update'
The requirement to run emerge --metadata seems to suggest that
you use git? If this is true, better use egencache to generate
far as I am aware, was either
caused by bad timing between commits and rsync metadata generation or some other
factor in generating the metadata being pushed out to rsync servers; though from
what I've seen it seems to only affect some mirrors.
0: https://bugs.gentoo.org/579204
--
Sam Jorna
Hi,
To switch from rsync to git I am following the steps described here
https://www.reddit.com/r/Gentoo/comments/3i141w/now_that_portage_is_using_git_how_do_i_git_pull/
The last step I did was "mv /usr/portage /usr/portage.old ; emerge
sync" and I got:
solfire:/usr>
Cs take the binary
> packages from this HTTP location and do their normal stuff afterward.
> The host box is also a local rsync mirror.
>
Why not just share everything via bind mounts in this case? I'd think
that would have less overhead than rsync/http and then you're not
storing files twice.
--
Rich
strip and ecompressdir:
installsources: rsyncing source files
rsync: link_stat
"/var/tmp/portage/net-wireless/bluez-5.47-r1/work/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.23-r4/work/glibc-2.23/csu"
failed: No such file or directory (2)
rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previ
On 2018-07-05, Grant Edwards wrote:
> As of today, I seem to be unable to a an "emerge --sync".
>
> The process either hangs forever at the "Refreshing keys from keyserver step:
[...]
> Or, it fails because there are no public key to verify a manfest:
For now, I've
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:08:08 -0500, Dale wrote:
> If you are using rsync or cp -u you could start the copy then stop at it
> certain points to let the SSD cool, then start it again. It will
> basically pick up where it left off.
Don't use cp -u, if you interrupt it while a file is bei
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:31:26 -0600, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
> > And correct me if I'm wrong but with rsync if something dies in
> > process you can usually start it back up and complete the job without
> > starting over from scratch.
>
> If you use the --partial f
; And yes, I plug the USB device back to original machine and md5sum is
> correct, same as the original.
>
> I copied the large file over network to another box and md5sum of:
> windows-7_pro_May-23-21.ova is correct same as on the original box.
>
> I run this: "rsync
ge --sync
(whether on the same stage3 or with a new one).
The stable repo is less likely to have this problem, but I don't think
it is available via rsync. (At least, the last time I looked into it
we weren't using the stable repo for rsync.)
--
Rich
ually fixes it. Have you tried a different rsync mirror?
> You can use 'mirrorselect -i -r' for this task.
I used to see this from time to time, but then I switched to using git
instead of rsync and haven't seen it again. There's the added bonus that
syncing is MUCH faster too.
--
Neil Bo
t;.
It did, but if all you had changed in repos.conf was the sync method, it
would have come back after the next sync. I switched from rsync to git
some time ago and it just worked.
You made the classic mistake of changing two things at once and then not
knowing which change caused the blow up
How do you migrate from rsync to git for 'emerge --sync'?
I changed my /etc/porttage/repos.conf/gentoo.conf file as shown in
various places, but when I try to do a sync, git barfs:
# emerge --sync >>> Syncing repository 'gentoo' into '/usr/portage'...
/usr/bin/git clone --dept
501 - 600 of 3607 matches
Mail list logo
