On Thursday 26 November 2009 22:59:24 Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:20:26 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
> > > kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
> > > for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages.
> > > It had kde-meta-3.5.10. Is t
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:59:24 +, Mick wrote:
> That's a good point ... over the years I have accumulated all sorts of
> packages I am not sure I need (by forgetting to use --oneshot). Should
> these be in there?
Do you use them, or does something else you use use them? In the former
case, th
That's a good point ... over the years I have accumulated all sorts of
packages I am not sure I need (by forgetting to use --oneshot). Should these
be in there?
kde-base/akregator
kde-base/ark
kde-base/drkonqi
kde-base/kaddressbook
kde-base/kappfinder
kde-base/ka
On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:20:26 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
> > kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
> > for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages.
> > It had kde-meta-3.5.10. Is there some syntax or a better
> > method to insure all the kd
On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
> kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
> for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages.
> It had kde-meta-3.5.10. Is there some syntax or a better
> method to insure all the kde-3.5.x packages are removed,
> without a manual sweep?
>
grep kde
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> emerge -C device-mapper && emerge lvm2 udev
Yep, mix in an extra reboot and it's all fine now!
> eclipse doesn't DEPEND on xulrunner at all, but various other things do.
> equery depends -a xulrunner:1.8 lists about 40 possibilities here.
eclipse depends
6 matches
Mail list logo
