Re: [gentoo-user] [SUSPECTED SPAM] [OT] Best *SIMPLE* firewall?

2018-03-01 Thread Mick
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 17:58:44 GMT Tom H wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > Is there something besides iptables? It seems to be like > > systemd/perl/python, continuously expanding its scope. And no, I'm not > > looking for an "easy-peasy

Re: [gentoo-user] [SUSPECTED SPAM] [OT] Best *SIMPLE* firewall?

2018-03-01 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > Is there something besides iptables? It seems to be like > systemd/perl/python, continuously expanding its scope. And no, I'm not > looking for an "easy-peasy front-end gui" that'll probably pull in 90% > of QT as

Re: [gentoo-user] [SUSPECTED SPAM] [OT] Best *SIMPLE* firewall?

2018-02-28 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:15:59 -0500 schrieb "Walter Dnes" : > Is there something besides iptables? It seems to be like > systemd/perl/python, continuously expanding its scope. And no, I'm > not looking for an "easy-peasy front-end gui" that'll probably pull > in 90% of

Re: [gentoo-user] [SUSPECTED SPAM] [OT] Best *SIMPLE* firewall?

2018-02-28 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > Is there something besides iptables? It seems to be like > systemd/perl/python, continuously expanding its scope. And no, I'm not > looking for an "easy-peasy front-end gui" that'll probably pull in 90% > of QT as

[gentoo-user] [SUSPECTED SPAM] [OT] Best *SIMPLE* firewall?

2018-02-28 Thread Walter Dnes
Is there something besides iptables? It seems to be like systemd/perl/python, continuously expanding its scope. And no, I'm not looking for an "easy-peasy front-end gui" that'll probably pull in 90% of QT as dependancies. I fondly remember IPCHAINS. -- Walter Dnes I