On Monday 16 February 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:51:11 + (UTC), James wrote:
If the rub is really the gcc compiler, then do not have it installed;
activate a remote partition with any such tools as gcc, coreutils
and use them for admin things. Then unmount these
Johannes Frandsen jsf at imento.dk writes:
Somebody pointed out that having a productions server with a gcc
installed was a big no no security wise, so I did a bit of goggling on
that topic and found a couple of articles supporting that view.
From 10,000 feet above, for those less
Dirk Heinrichs dirk.heinrichs at online.de writes:
would you please be so kind and avoid hijacking other threads next time.
Um, you must not have read the response.
I did specifically address and provide remedy if indeed having gcc
installed on a machine is a security threat.
Sure I
james wrote:
Dirk Heinrichs dirk.heinrichs at online.de writes:
would you please be so kind and avoid hijacking other threads next time.
Um, you must not have read the response.
I did specifically address and provide remedy if indeed having gcc
installed on a machine is a security
Am Montag, 16. Februar 2009 21:15:50 schrieb james:
Um, you must not have read the response.
I didn't reply to you, but to Johannes. Maybe your email client doesn't
display the threads correctly. You can verify this by reading the headers,
especially In-reply-to:.
I did specifically address
Dirk Heinrichs dirk.heinrichs at online.de writes:
I didn't reply to you, but to Johannes. Maybe your email client doesn't
display the threads correctly. You can verify this by reading the headers,
especially In-reply-to:.
The original thread was about Mailing Lists to discuss about
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:51:11 + (UTC), James wrote:
If the rub is really the gcc compiler, then do not have it installed;
activate a remote partition with any such tools as gcc, coreutils
and use them for admin things. Then unmount these (NFS or such)
necessary system tools, when your not
7 matches
Mail list logo
