Re: [gentoo-user] Re: is samba 3.0.23b available in some form

2006-08-13 Thread Nick Rout
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:16:18 +0200 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > When it is possible portage uses the name of the ebuild to determine what > version of a package to download. So if the build process is unchanged and > the revision naming from upstream is sane then renaming the ebuild should be >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: is samba 3.0.23b available in some form

2006-08-13 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 13 August 2006 02:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Anyone know if something is available in version 3.0.23b? > > > > You can just rename the ebuild and put it into your overlay until the > > gentoo samba develope

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: is samba 3.0.23b available in some form

2006-08-13 Thread Julien Cabillot
(excuse my english, I'm french)On 8/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Something here is a bit confusing... I don't understand how renamingone version of samba to another does much for me.  I need the actual new version installed, not the old version renamed and installed asthe new

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: is samba 3.0.23b available in some form

2006-08-13 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 06:41:24 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Results in files being downloaded and deposited in > /usr/portage/distfiles. > > Shouldn't these be going to the overlay? (/usr/local/portage/distfiles) No, there is only one $DISTDIR. Once you've created the digest, you can emerge

[gentoo-user] Re: is samba 3.0.23b available in some form

2006-08-13 Thread reader
"Julien Cabillot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not on a gentoo box now, so it should be something like that: > # mv > samba-3.0.23a.ebuild/path/to/an/overlay/the_category-for_samba/samba/samba- > 3.0.23b.ebuild > # ebuild samba-3.0.23b.ebuild digest > # emerge -u samba > > If you don't have

[gentoo-user] Re: is samba 3.0.23b available in some form

2006-08-13 Thread reader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Something here is a bit confusing... I don't understand how renaming > one version of samba to another does much for me. I need the actual > new version installed, not the old version renamed and installed as > the new version. > > Unless something very magic happens a

[gentoo-user] Re: is samba 3.0.23b available in some form

2006-08-13 Thread reader
"Julien Cabillot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not on a gentoo box now, so it should be something like that: > # mv > samba-3.0.23a.ebuild/path/to/an/overlay/the_category-for_samba/samba/samba- > 3.0.23b.ebuild > # ebuild samba-3.0.23b.ebuild digest > # emerge -u samba Something here is a b

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: is samba 3.0.23b available in some form

2006-08-13 Thread Julien Cabillot
I'm not on a gentoo box now, so it should be something like that: # mv samba-3.0.23a.ebuild /path/to/an/overlay/the_category-for_samba/samba/samba-3.0.23b.ebuild # ebuild samba-3.0.23b.ebuild digest # emerge -u samba   If you don't have an overlay yet take a look at: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_In

[gentoo-user] Re: is samba 3.0.23b available in some form

2006-08-12 Thread reader
Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Anyone know if something is available in version 3.0.23b? > > You can just rename the ebuild and put it into your overlay until the gentoo > samba developers get to it. That sailed right over my thick skull. Can you elab

[gentoo-user] Re: is samba 3.0.23b available in some form

2006-08-12 Thread Stefan Schweizer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Anyone know if something is available in version 3.0.23b? You can just rename the ebuild and put it into your overlay until the gentoo samba developers get to it. Regards, Stefan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list