Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-08 Thread Mick
2009/5/8 Steve : > Mick wrote: >> >> An adaptor can have more than one public IP address (multi-homing) and you >> can use something like: ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 up >> to set them up (increment eth0:1, eth0:2, etc accordingly).  However, if >> your SSL vhost is listening

Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-08 Thread Steve
Mick wrote: An adaptor can have more than one public IP address (multi-homing) and you can use something like: ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 up to set them up (increment eth0:1, eth0:2, etc accordingly). However, if your SSL vhost is listening on a random port you don't nee

Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-07 Thread Mick
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Steve wrote: > Anthony Metcalf wrote: > > *That* depends on the exact specifics of what he is/isn't allowed to > > be showing."They" may not even want the service to show as > > existing at that address for whatever reason. > > Thanks for all your discussion... I'll tr

Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-07 Thread Steve
Anthony Metcalf wrote: *That* depends on the exact specifics of what he is/isn't allowed to be showing."They" may not even want the service to show as existing at that address for whatever reason. Thanks for all your discussion... I'll try to clarify - the PPP over SSH approach does seem

Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-06 Thread Anthony Metcalf
Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 06 May 2009 11:09:50 +0100, Anthony Metcalf wrote: > > >>> If the second server is only serving HTTPS, you don't even need that. >>> Just have the router forward port 80 to the first server and port 443 >>> to the second. >>> >>> >> That leaves the HTTP

Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-06 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 06 May 2009 11:09:50 +0100, Anthony Metcalf wrote: > > If the second server is only serving HTTPS, you don't even need that. > > Just have the router forward port 80 to the first server and port 443 > > to the second. > > > That leaves the HTTPS server open to the public though, which

Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-06 Thread Anthony Metcalf
Neil Bothwick wrote: > If the second server is only serving HTTPS, you don't even need that. > Just have the router forward port 80 to the first server and port 443 to > the second. > That leaves the HTTPS server open to the public though, which is specifically not allowed to the OP. I would sa

Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-06 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 6 May 2009 06:24:08 +0600, Mike Kazantsev wrote: > But you don't have to! > Just setup first apache to forward requests to the second one in any > way you like using mod_rewrite: If the second server is only serving HTTPS, you don't even need that. Just have the router forward port 80 to

Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-05 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Tue, 05 May 2009 22:28:22 +0100 Steve wrote: > Sascha Hlusiak wrote: > > The easiest thing would probably be to just use ssh port forwarding because > > you already have all the pieces running anyway. Wouldn't a simple > > > > ssh -L 12345:secondapache:https u...@remotessh ... > I really wa

Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-05 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 05 May 2009, Sascha Hlusiak wrote: > Am Dienstag 05 Mai 2009 23:28:22 schrieb Steve: > > Sascha Hlusiak wrote: > > > The easiest thing would probably be to just use ssh port forwarding > > > because you already have all the pieces running anyway. Wouldn't a > > > simple > > > > > > ssh

Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-05 Thread Sascha Hlusiak
Am Dienstag 05 Mai 2009 23:28:22 schrieb Steve: > Sascha Hlusiak wrote: > > The easiest thing would probably be to just use ssh port forwarding > > because you already have all the pieces running anyway. Wouldn't a simple > > > > ssh -L 12345:secondapache:https u...@remotessh > > > > and the brow

Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-05 Thread Steve
Sascha Hlusiak wrote: The easiest thing would probably be to just use ssh port forwarding because you already have all the pieces running anyway. Wouldn't a simple ssh -L 12345:secondapache:https u...@remotessh and the browsing to https://localhost:12345 do the trick? Or you could use a ppp

Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-05 Thread Sascha Hlusiak
Am Dienstag 05 Mai 2009 22:32:38 schrieb Steve: > I've a gentoo box sat behind a firewall - it runs a apache and sshd with > holes punched through NAT to allow remote access. It runs DHCP and DNS > services for my LAN. > > I would like to run a second instance of apache on a fresh IP address - > t

[gentoo-user] A networking question...

2009-05-05 Thread Steve
I've a gentoo box sat behind a firewall - it runs a apache and sshd with holes punched through NAT to allow remote access. It runs DHCP and DNS services for my LAN. I would like to run a second instance of apache on a fresh IP address - to simulate a hosted environment supporting https. I ne