On 2013-04-24 10:23 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
My Gentoo VMs in the cloud (using VMware's vCloud) uses PV-SCSI. It's
stable... but kind of sensitive: Everytime the cloud provider do
something with their storage, my VMs become Read-Only.
Ouch... so, how do you fix it?
On Apr 25, 2013 5:54 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-04-24 10:23 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
My Gentoo VMs in the cloud (using VMware's vCloud) uses PV-SCSI. It's
stable... but kind of sensitive: Everytime the cloud provider do
something with their
On 2013-04-25 7:44 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Apr 25, 2013 5:54 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-04-24 10:23 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
My Gentoo VMs in the cloud (using VMware's vCloud) uses PV-SCSI. It's
stable... but kind of sensitive: Everytime the cloud provider do
something
Anyone?
On 2013-04-23 3:28 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-04-22 8:56 AM, Andre Lucas Falco alfa...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/4/21 Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Windows VMs see get an 'LSI Logic SAS', and my gentoo VM gets an
'LSI Logic Parallel' controller.
On Apr 24, 2013 2:29 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-04-22 8:56 AM, Andre Lucas Falco alfa...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/4/21 Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Windows VMs see get an 'LSI Logic SAS', and my gentoo VM gets an
'LSI Logic Parallel' controller.
Did
On 2013-04-22 8:56 AM, Andre Lucas Falco alfa...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/4/21 Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Windows VMs see get an 'LSI Logic SAS', and my gentoo VM gets an
'LSI Logic Parallel' controller.
Did you tested using pvscsi? It's improve performance with less cost to
CPU
2013/4/21 Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
Windows VMs see get an 'LSI Logic SAS', and my gentoo VM gets an 'LSI
Logic Parallel' controller.
Did you tested using pvscsi? It's improve performance with less cost to CPU
usage.
On Sat, April 20, 2013 17:33, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 20/04/2013 17:00, Tanstaafl wrote:
Thanks for the responses so far...
Another question - are there any caveats as to which filesystem to use
for a mail server, for virtualized systems? Ir do the same
issues/questions apply (ie, does the
On Sat, April 20, 2013 17:38, Jarry wrote:
On 20-Apr-13 17:00, Tanstaafl wrote:
Another question - are there any caveats as to which filesystem to use
for a mail server, for virtualized systems? Ir do the same
issues/questions apply (ie, does the fact that it is virtualized not
change
On Sat, April 20, 2013 18:22, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Apr 20, 2013 10:01 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Thanks for the responses so far...
Another question - are there any caveats as to which filesystem to use
for a mail server, for virtualized systems? Ir do the same
On Apr 21, 2013 4:51 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Sat, April 20, 2013 18:22, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Apr 20, 2013 10:01 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Thanks for the responses so far...
Another question - are there any caveats as to which filesystem to
Thanks for the reply Alan...
On 2013-04-20 11:33 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
If VMWare gives you a really shitty host driver, then something
really shitty is going to be the best you can achieve.
The host is a Dell R515 with the Perc H700.
Windows VMs see get an 'LSI
On 2013-04-21 5:47 AM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Sat, April 20, 2013 17:38, Jarry wrote:
Problem of virtualized filesystem is not that it is virtualized,
but that it is located on datastore with more virtual systems,
all of them competing for the same i/o. *That* is the
On 21/04/2013 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
Thanks for the reply Alan...
On 2013-04-20 11:33 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
If VMWare gives you a really shitty host driver, then something
really shitty is going to be the best you can achieve.
The host is a Dell R515 with the
On Sun, April 21, 2013 17:09, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-04-21 5:47 AM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Sat, April 20, 2013 17:38, Jarry wrote:
Problem of virtualized filesystem is not that it is virtualized,
but that it is located on datastore with more virtual systems,
all of them
On Sun, April 21, 2013 12:06, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Apr 21, 2013 4:51 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Sat, April 20, 2013 18:22, Pandu Poluan wrote:
If you have the budget, you really should invest in a SAN
Storage solution that can provide tiered storage, in which
Thanks for the responses so far...
Another question - are there any caveats as to which filesystem to use
for a mail server, for virtualized systems? Ir do the same
issues/questions apply (ie, does the fact that it is virtualized not
change anything)?
If there are none, I'm curious what
On 20/04/2013 17:00, Tanstaafl wrote:
Thanks for the responses so far...
Another question - are there any caveats as to which filesystem to use
for a mail server, for virtualized systems? Ir do the same
issues/questions apply (ie, does the fact that it is virtualized not
change anything)?
On 20-Apr-13 17:00, Tanstaafl wrote:
Another question - are there any caveats as to which filesystem to use
for a mail server, for virtualized systems? Ir do the same
issues/questions apply (ie, does the fact that it is virtualized not
change anything)?
Problem of virtualized filesystem is
On Apr 20, 2013 10:01 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Thanks for the responses so far...
Another question - are there any caveats as to which filesystem to use
for a mail server, for virtualized systems? Ir do the same issues/questions
apply (ie, does the fact that it is
20 matches
Mail list logo
