On 27 March 2013, at 23:37, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
...
Like Stroller I've been using net-misc/whois for ever and it does
what I want, but don't know what the other packages may be able to
do/do better. I would also be interested to find out why people
prefer using these.
They're all
On 03/28/2013 03:11 PM, Stroller wrote:
The search I made before posting led me the wikipedia article which
mentioned, for example, using thick and thin client models.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whois#Thin_and_thick_lookups
One might assume, for example, that a thin client might tend to
On Tuesday 26 Mar 2013 18:57:18 Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/26/2013 01:54 PM, Stroller wrote:
Searching portage, I find there are quite a number of alternative whois
clients.
I think I have always used net-misc/whois in the past I now notice that a
BSD whois is available, a generic and an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/2013 06:08 AM, Mick wrote:
Like Stroller I've been using net-misc/whois for ever and it does
what I want, but don't know what the other packages may be able to
do/do better. I would also be interested to find out why people
prefer
from eix, it says that jwhois can do recursive queries
whatever that means.
-Kevin
On 03/27/2013 06:37 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 03/27/2013 06:08 AM, Mick wrote:
Like Stroller I've been using net-misc/whois for ever and it does
what I want, but don't know what the other packages may
Searching portage, I find there are quite a number of alternative whois
clients.
I think I have always used net-misc/whois in the past I now notice that a BSD
whois is available, a generic and an advanced jwhois.
Presumably there are some differences between the functionality provided by
On 03/26/2013 01:54 PM, Stroller wrote:
Searching portage, I find there are quite a number of alternative whois
clients.
I think I have always used net-misc/whois in the past I now notice that a BSD
whois is available, a generic and an advanced jwhois.
Presumably there are some
7 matches
Mail list logo
