On 11/01 06:04, David Haller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> [..]
> >(using zsh)
> >export PATCH_OPTS=-I; emerge structure-synth
>
> Ah PATCH_OPTS. 'man epatch.eclass' just popped up on my reading list.
>
> >which fails the same way...
>
> 'minus' little 'Ludwi
On 11/01 05:42, David Haller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> [..]
> >nope...currently the cat is more dead than alive...
> >I looked at it!
> >
> >I did the following:
> >
> >vim
> >:set ff
> >unix
> >:set ff=dos
> >:wq
> >repoman -v manifest (since file has chan
Hello,
On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
[..]
>(using zsh)
>export PATCH_OPTS=-I; emerge structure-synth
Ah PATCH_OPTS. 'man epatch.eclass' just popped up on my reading list.
>which fails the same way...
'minus' little 'Ludwig'... Not 'minus' big 'Isaac' ...
Read 'patch --help' pleas
Hello,
On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
[..]
>nope...currently the cat is more dead than alive...
>I looked at it!
>
>I did the following:
>
>vim
>:set ff
>unix
>:set ff=dos
>:wq
>repoman -v manifest (since file has changed)
Does vim really reencode lineendings there?
>emerge structu
On 11/01 04:44, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> On 11/01 04:05, David Haller wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > [..]
> > >Thanks a lot for the extensive help, SIR! :)
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [..]
> > >The patch itself was found (so the local thing works fine) and
On 11/01 04:05, David Haller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> [..]
> >Thanks a lot for the extensive help, SIR! :)
>
> Thanks.
>
> [..]
> >The patch itself was found (so the local thing works fine) and failed.
> >
> >The *.patch.out is attached to the email and a
Hello,
On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
[..]
>Thanks a lot for the extensive help, SIR! :)
Thanks.
[..]
>The patch itself was found (so the local thing works fine) and failed.
>
>The *.patch.out is attached to the email and after looking into it I
>think you will find the problem a hu
On 11/01 11:03, David Haller wrote:
> Hello Meino,
>
> On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> [..]
> >But it seems, that I am doing something wrong with the local
> >overlay...
>
> I assumed you already have one. If not, drop this into your
> /etc/portage/repos.conf/ directory as e.g. loca
Hello Meino,
On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
[..]
>But it seems, that I am doing something wrong with the local
>overlay...
I assumed you already have one. If not, drop this into your
/etc/portage/repos.conf/ directory as e.g. local.conf:
/etc/portage/repos.conf/local.conf
On 11/01 05:17, David Haller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> >I am trying to compile this wonderful beast:
> >* media-gfx/structure-synth
> > Available versions: (~)1.5.0
> > Homepage:http://structuresynth.sourceforge.net/
> > Description:
Hello,
On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>I am trying to compile this wonderful beast:
>* media-gfx/structure-synth
> Available versions: (~)1.5.0
> Homepage:http://structuresynth.sourceforge.net/
> Description: A program to generate 3D structures by spec
Hi,
I am trying to compile this wonderful beast:
* media-gfx/structure-synth
Available versions: (~)1.5.0
Homepage:http://structuresynth.sourceforge.net/
Description: A program to generate 3D structures by specifying a
design grammar
and it gives me this:
x8
12 matches
Mail list logo
