Re: [gentoo-user] E17 and package.use

2010-11-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:31 on Saturday 20 November 2010, Mick did opine thusly: > For x11-wm/enlightenment I'll have to keep ** in keywords, but switch > overlay to 'enlightenment'. Add the enlightenment overlay, but read a few key ebuilds to get a grasp of what's going on and

Re: [gentoo-user] E17 and package.use

2010-11-19 Thread Mick
On Friday 19 November 2010 23:14:01 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 11:06 on Friday 19 November 2010, Mick did > > opine thusly: > > So it seems that I should delete efl, install enlightenment overlay > > instead, remove any package.keywords on all ** packages (?) that

Re: [gentoo-user] E17 and package.use

2010-11-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:06 on Friday 19 November 2010, Mick did opine thusly: > So it seems that I should delete efl, install enlightenment overlay > instead, remove any package.keywords on all ** packages (?) that I > had set up for efl and instead unmask beta versions of packag

Re: [gentoo-user] E17 and package.use

2010-11-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:06 on Friday 19 November 2010, Mick did opine thusly: > On Thursday 18 November 2010 22:41:49 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > With all these changes it's hard to give firm advice, except to say this: > > > > If conf-update wants to make changes to package categories,

Re: [gentoo-user] E17 and package.use

2010-11-19 Thread Mick
On Thursday 18 November 2010 22:41:49 Alan McKinnon wrote: > With all these changes it's hard to give firm advice, except to say this: > > If conf-update wants to make changes to package categories, and eix on your > machine gives the same new ones as the new config file, then make the > change.

Re: [gentoo-user] E17 and package.use

2010-11-18 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:04 on Friday 19 November 2010, Mick did opine thusly: > On Thursday 18 November 2010 20:26:36 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 22:10 on Thursday 18 November 2010, Mick > > did > > > > opine thusly: > > > I have installed E17 using layman

Re: [gentoo-user] E17 and package.use

2010-11-18 Thread Mick
On Thursday 18 November 2010 20:26:36 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 22:10 on Thursday 18 November 2010, Mick > did > > opine thusly: > > I have installed E17 using layman and the efl overlay, but today I just > > ran dispatch-conf and these changes showed up: > > =

Re: [gentoo-user] E17 and package.use

2010-11-18 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:10 on Thursday 18 November 2010, Mick did opine thusly: > I have installed E17 using layman and the efl overlay, but today I just ran > dispatch-conf and these changes showed up: > = > --- /etc/portage/package.use2010-

[gentoo-user] E17 and package.use

2010-11-18 Thread Mick
I have installed E17 using layman and the efl overlay, but today I just ran dispatch-conf and these changes showed up: = --- /etc/portage/package.use2010-11-15 12:50:46.0 + +++ /etc/portage/._cfg_package.use 2010-11-18 19:35:35.0