On Friday 10 June 2011 08:52:15 Pandu Poluan wrote:
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
From: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
Date: 2011-06-10 03:52
And another bonus is that there are plenty of
funny things we can spell in hexadecimal
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:22, Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Friday 10 June 2011 08:52:15 Pandu Poluan wrote:
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
From: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
Date: 2011-06-10 03:52
And another bonus
On Friday 10 June 2011 17:08:40 Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:22, Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Friday 10 June 2011 08:52:15 Pandu Poluan wrote:
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
From: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen
message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
From: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
Date: 2011-06-10 03:52
And another bonus is that there are plenty of
funny things we can spell in hexadecimal. ;)
While I'm sure I'll tag the C001:D00D address
OK. I rebooted and I don't think the test results changed anything.
Test with IPv4 DNS record
ok (1.003s) using ipv4
Test with IPv6 DNS record
bad (0.496s)
Test with Dual Stack DNS record
ok (0.993s) using ipv4
Test for Dual Stack DNS and large
10 June 2011 08:52:15 Pandu Poluan wrote:
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
From: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
Date: 2011-06-10 03:52
And another bonus is that there are plenty of
funny things we can spell
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thoughts? Something I need to check here?
Does your ISP offer IPv6? If not, are you using an IPv6 tunnel of some
kind? If not, then you don't have IPv6 connection to the Internet, so
the results look normal.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
You have managers that know what an IP address is?
iPod, iPhone, iPad... surely iP is something related to that.
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thoughts? Something I need to check here?
Does your ISP offer IPv6? If not, are you using an IPv6 tunnel of some
kind? If not, then you don't have IPv6 connection to the Internet, so
the results
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just hoping html5 will improve some things. May not but doesn't hurt to
hope. I just hope it will eliminate some of the things that are such power
or memory hogs now. It may not at first but
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 23:56:32 Dale wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Read the FAQ and Info posted.
From the website:
If this test fails: it means that the DNS resolver you are using,
requires IPv4 to reach the DNS authoritative servers of your favoriate
web sites. In the near
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:52 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just hoping html5 will improve some things. May not but doesn't
hurt to hope. I just hope it will eliminate
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:52 on Thursday 09 June 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just hoping html5 will improve some things. May not but doesn't
hurt to
On 2011-06-08 9:25 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
After that, machines on my local network (including wifi) can get both
IPv4 and IPv6 addresses from the router and can talk to the outside
world on either network.
I'm getting a headache...
Is there a decent guide that explains IPV6 for noobs who
On 9 June 2011 12:16, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2011-06-08 9:25 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
After that, machines on my local network (including wifi) can get both
IPv4 and IPv6 addresses from the router and can talk to the outside
world on either network.
I'm getting a
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On my wife's Windows 7 laptop, it just worked perfectly after I
enabled it on my router and her wifi reconnected. All tests on
test-ipv6.com pass except for the last DNS test. She can go to sites
like
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, Windows Vista and 7 generate randomized host IDs for public IPv6
addresses, it's generally advised to disable that. You can do that by
running this at administrator cmd prompt:
netsh interface ipv6 set global
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2011-06-08 9:25 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
After that, machines on my local network (including wifi) can get both
IPv4 and IPv6 addresses from the router and can talk to the outside
world on either network.
I'm
On Thursday 09 Jun 2011 16:51:29 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, Windows Vista and 7 generate randomized host IDs for public IPv6
addresses, it's generally advised to disable that. You can do that by
running this at
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
I take it that loading this module would cut both ways. If I were to allow
connections to my server only for *my* IP address, then that would be quite
difficult to achieve if my IP address changed every few minutes.
Since
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
From: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
Date: 2011-06-10 03:52
And another bonus is that there are plenty of
funny things we can spell in hexadecimal. ;)
While I'm sure I'll tag the C001:D00D address for my
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 20:27:45 Dale wrote:
11:
Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4
Test mit Dual Stack und grosse Pakete
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 20:27:45 Dale wrote:
11:
Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4
Test mit
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Funny thing is, I use googles DNS servers. 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 are the
settings. I find it ironic that Google is one of the ones hosting this
event and it appears their server is not ready. Makes me think. Dale
scratches chin
2011/6/8 Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com:
11:
Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4
Test mit Dual Stack und grosse Pakete
ok (0.665s) verwende
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Should I have the USE flag ipv6 enabled or should I leave it off for now?
If so, anyone had any trouble with it or is this a trivial change?
Enable the IPv6 stuff in kernel, enable ipv6 USE flag in your
make.conf, rebuild any
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:45 on Wednesday 08 June 2011, Paul Hartman
did opine thusly:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Funny thing is, I use googles DNS servers. 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 are the
settings. I find it ironic that Google is one of the ones
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 20:51:10 Paul Hartman wrote:
2011/6/8 Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com:
11:
Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
ok (0.726s) verwende
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 20:51:10 Paul Hartman wrote:
Charter Communications cable internet:
Test with IPv4 DNS record
ok (0.580s) using ipv4
Test with IPv6 DNS record
ok (0.268s) using ipv6
Test with Dual Stack DNS
-original message-
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
From: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
Date: 2011-06-09 08:25
And now I'll try not to talk about Windows on this list again for the
remainder of the year. ;)
Naaah, is okay... as long as you don't do it excessively
Paul Hartman wrote:
Enable the IPv6 stuff in kernel, enable ipv6 USE flag in your
make.conf, rebuild any packages that were -ipv6 before, and you should
be good to go from a basics standpoint.
After that, you need actual IPv6 service from your ISP (and modem and
router), or tunnel over IPv4
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 09:15, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Now what was I thinking. Oh, wait. I wasn't thinking. There was the
problem right there. I hadn't enabled any of the IPv6 stuff in the kernel.
Jeeez, what a idiot. I haven't even thought of the kernel settings.
sighs
You
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 13:59:36 Dale wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 20:27:45 Dale wrote:
11:
Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4
Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag
ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4
Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag
ok
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 09:15, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Now what was I thinking. Oh, wait. I wasn't thinking. There was the
problem right there. I hadn't enabled any of the IPv6 stuff in the kernel.
Jeeez, what a idiot. I haven't even thought of the kernel
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Read the FAQ and Info posted.
From the website:
If this test fails: it means that the DNS resolver you are using, requires
IPv4 to reach the DNS authoritative servers of your favoriate web sites. In
the near future, every web site of consequence will remain
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just hoping html5 will improve some things. May not but doesn't hurt to
hope. I just hope it will eliminate some of the things that are such power
or memory hogs now. It may not at first but eventually
Some stuff is
On Thursday 09 Jun 2011 02:25:43 Paul Hartman wrote:
My wireless router is running DD-WRT (which is a Linux distro). It is
running kernel 2.6.34 and has all the ipv6 modules enabled in the
kernel. Basically, it is setup by loading the sit module
(CONFIG_IPV6_SIT_6RD in kernel config). Then
Howdy,
I got a link to this:
http://www.worldipv6day.org/
From there, there is a link to test whether the new IPv6 works on my
system and between me and the reat of the world. It appears I am not
ready. It complained about the DNS server for the most part. Funny
thing is, I use googles
Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I got a link to this:
http://www.worldipv6day.org/
From there, there is a link to test whether the new IPv6 works on my
system and between me and the reat of the world. It appears I am not
ready. It complained about the DNS server for the most part. Funny
thing is, I
Actually, it is enabled already. Here is its complaint list:
Test with IPv6 DNS record
bad (0.261s)
Works for me (asking for v6 record using v4 transport). I dont have v6
transport.
/home/adam$ host -t www.google.com
www.google.com is an alias for www.l.google.com.
www.l.google.com
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 03:18:47 Adam Carter wrote:
Actually, it is enabled already. Here is its complaint list:
Test with IPv6 DNS record
bad (0.261s)
Works for me (asking for v6 record using v4 transport). I dont have v6
transport.
/home/adam$ host -t www.google.com
41 matches
Mail list logo
