On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 10:52:21PM +0100, Mick wrote
On Sunday 15 Jun 2014 20:37:46 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Not too sure really how wear and tear translates to real life;
overall it's probably just simple bloat you have, to borrow Walter's
analogy you started with a sub-compact and now
On Saturday 14 Jun 2014 23:57:43 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 15/06/2014 00:20, Mick wrote:
I looked at how long some packages are taking these days. I noticed that
firefox and chromium take a lot longer to emerge than was the case 3-4
years ago. For example:
[snip ...]
Your firefox example
On 15/06/2014 09:27, Mick wrote:
And maybe your disks are tired too :-) . You do have hdparm results from
4 years ago to compare?
I have not install hdparm on this laptop, thinking that I do not really need
it for anything. Anyway, do disks spin slower with age? Even if their
bearings
On Sunday 15 Jun 2014 20:37:46 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 15/06/2014 09:27, Mick wrote:
And maybe your disks are tired too :-) . You do have hdparm results from
4 years ago to compare?
I have not install hdparm on this laptop, thinking that I do not really
need it for anything.
I looked at how long some packages are taking these days. I noticed that
firefox and chromium take a lot longer to emerge than was the case 3-4 years
ago. For example:
# genlop -t www-client/firefox
* www-client/firefox
Sat Dec 18 17:19:14 2010 www-client/firefox-3.6.13
merge
On 15/06/2014 00:20, Mick wrote:
I looked at how long some packages are taking these days. I noticed that
firefox and chromium take a lot longer to emerge than was the case 3-4 years
ago. For example:
# genlop -t www-client/firefox
* www-client/firefox
Sat Dec 18 17:19:14 2010
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 11:20:40PM +0100, Mick wrote
I looked at how long some packages are taking these days. I noticed that
firefox and chromium take a lot longer to emerge than was the case 3-4 years
ago. For example:
[...deletia...]
I am wondering if something in my configuration is
7 matches
Mail list logo
