Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken? [SOLVED]
On Sunday 05 April 2015 10:50:53 I wrote: Today's routine update included dev-lang/perl-5.20.2 and two perl virtuals. Since emerging those portage has stopped working: perl-cleaner gives it a list of 71 packages to emerge but portage does nothing with them - it just exits silently. Then perl-cleaner lists some hundreds of files that it can't do anything with. What's going on here? I've restored from last week's backup and added the offending perl packages to package.mask, but is that the right thing to do? For the record, my problem has now been fixed, together with some others I hadn't reported here. It was a combination of bad CFLAGS (and CXXFLAGS) and too ambitious MAKEOPTS. Specifically, I recommend that any advice to set -march=corei7 on an i5 system should be firmly resisted. Thanks to those who took an interest and offered help. -- Rgds Peter
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
On Monday 06 April 2015 04:30:35 I wrote:
After a bit more thought I remember that GCC was upgraded last week, and
the change log referred to many bug fixes. (That's what my memory tells
me, anyway, but I can't see where I found it now.) So I decided to emerge
-e world, which I did in two passes: first emerge -eB world, then boot to
a minimal system and emerge -eK world. Then etc-update and reboot,
compile the kernel again (gentoo-sources-3.18.9) and a final reboot.
Maybe something went wrong in the middle of that, so I've set off the same
process again. It'll take a few hours, so I'm off to bed again meanwhile
- it's 04:30 here.
Well, after 18 hours of that emerge -e world, I started the completely
rebuilt system, removed those three packages from package.mask:
$ cat /etc/portage/package.mask
=sys-boot/grub-2.00
=sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.109
#
#=dev-lang/perl-5.20.2
#~virtual/perl-File-Spec-3.480.100
#~virtual/perl-Storable-2.490.100
...and ran perl-cleaner again. Same result - portage exited silently when
given the list of packages to install.
Next, eselect python set 1 set the main active version from its previous
3.3 to 2.7, just in case of some problem with 3.3. No difference.
Then I chose one of the silently ignored packages and tried to emerge it
myself, but still portage did nothing:
-
$ sudo emerge -1av dev-perl/Text-WrapI18N
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies done!
Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 KiB
Nothing to merge; quitting.
-
Yet the package is in the database:
$ eix -Ic dev-perl/Text-WrapI18N
[I] dev-perl/Text-WrapI18N (0.60.0-r1{tbz2}@10/02/15): Internationalized
substitute of Text::Wrap
Today's routine sync and update has pulled two packages in: gentoo-
sources-3.18.11 and chromium-41.0.2272.118. Gentoo-sources has just been
installed and I'm compiling the new kernel; chromium will take longer.
This just gets weirder and weirder. When does portage do what it's told and
when does it not? ;)
--
Rgds
Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Dienstag, 7. April 2015, 11:20:07 schrieb Peter Humphrey: Then I chose one of the silently ignored packages and tried to emerge it myself, but still portage did nothing: - $ sudo emerge -1av dev-perl/Text-WrapI18N These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies done! Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 KiB Nothing to merge; quitting. - Yeah, looks strange. Anything in your make.conf EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS ? - -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVJDpPXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0RkJDMzI0NjNBOTIwMDY5MTQ2NkMzNDBF MTM4NkZEN0VGNEI1Nzc5AAoJEOE4b9fvS1d5AmAQAMblxzu6NwC130CAkREcoGXy LfsbXL0b7JRKkFpK79Zmb7GYZfdwMYOTgJkWJhlgpWrQ+ZZY9jm+iye7yw1qtbj2 Wy9eqH/z6SY0uf/sxwj07OZG4Gn2wxS7n7f1LvdnFWjZZtP8U9C9OlsswZhuqE00 7D6ENKMqHYDp9mlpXPlGrFq5koWM8AcMG+08KNY+jrlZyWZbI9cMYEnJL4fY6eIv Ou+DFaXB8EWoc4X1l2SxuQ4md0JYETKbTozYnBob2q8WeUyoVF6NJq496IkQMllB EpSJ8RG3fD/QWkja588ffWwMmkVBhKm+xgW3JSqcjLjLV1eFHdkg1JK1PXxVq7jV JSP4RAbRVFyijygVWN40L6PD/AdXDDshwxw+88Np30CePn2m1vvAbx0ljTEUUjYX yAGNSIvm5kuNa8vdNfxwEZNybSNd6KHtfP1I9evNyqyNZ+lVprkJg6o4HHq3VYxZ vJnUj+pWh3GeobSZB5nQMP7tu1d3WcmT1mGU/unW9zcI7l0bc/CAaodcTg/F3dHJ TCjlhAxTpCklCKzoUAJqGyvy2KcVvR2GzLZyXqzcTO5pcvpfYQlo+aiNcke+MYDX E6hyZbrM+Aoa2LDV+Gs8fiURIFnOlzP/0f2GEoDJ6kqWTAHy6CA0ZxHib4IQm+FJ SxgT3vSxeI/muGjhEDKc =gQJm -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
On Tuesday 07 April 2015 22:12:57 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Dienstag, 7. April 2015, 11:20:07 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
Then I chose one of the silently ignored packages and tried to emerge it
myself, but still portage did nothing:
-
$ sudo emerge -1av dev-perl/Text-WrapI18N
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies done!
Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 KiB
Nothing to merge; quitting.
-
Yeah, looks strange. Anything in your make.conf EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS ?
$ grep EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS /etc/portage/make.conf
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--autounmask=n --changed-use --keep-going --nospinner
--quiet-unmerge-warn
$ cat make.conf # I made a local copy and removed a lot of comments
#CFLAGS=-O2 -march=core2 -pipe [1]
CFLAGS=-O2 -march=corei7 -pipe
CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
CPU_FLAGS_X86=mmx mmxext popcnt sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
ACCEPT_LICENSE=dlj-1.1 google-chrome Intel-SDP sun-bcla-java-vm
Oracle-BCLA-JavaSE PUEL AdobeFlash-11.x googleearth
ALSA_CARDS=hda-intel
CHECKREQS_ACTION=error
CONFIG_PROTECT=/etc /usr/share/config /usr/share/gnupg/qualified.txt
/usr/share/consolefonts /usr/bin/startx
/usr/share/applications/boincmgr-boinc.desktop
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK=/etc/init.d /etc/pam.d
DISTDIR=/usr/portage/distfiles
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--autounmask=n --changed-use --keep-going --nospinner
--quiet-unmerge-warn
FEATURES=buildpkg buildsyspkg
FETCHCOMMAND=/usr/bin/wget --progress=bar:force -t 2 -T 30 --passive-ftp -O
\\${DISTDIR}/\${FILE}\ \\${URI}\
ftp_proxy=http://serv.prhnet:8080;
GENTOO_MIRRORS=http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/gentoo/
http://mirror.qubenet.net/mirror/gentoo/
http://gentoo.virginmedia.com/;
GRUB_PLATFORMS=pc
http_proxy=http://serv.prhnet:8080;
INPUT_DEVICES=evdev
LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8
LIBREOFFICE_EXTENSIONS=pdfimport
LINGUAS=en_GB en
MAKEOPTS=-j -l16
PKGDIR=/usr/portage/packages
PORTAGE_NICENESS=3
PORTAGE_TMPDIR=/var/tmp
PORTDIR=/var/portage
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/local/portage
RESUMECOMMAND=/usr/bin/wget --progress=bar:force -c -t 2 -T 30 --passive-ftp
-O \\${DISTDIR}/\${FILE}\ \\${URI}\
USE=-bluetooth -fortran -gcj -gnome -iodbc -ldap -lirc -nis -odbc -systemd
-thin -upower
mmx mmxext popcnt sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3
VIDEO_CARDS=nouveau
[1] This bothers me. Various docs tell me to specify march=core17, but this
is an i5 CPU. Could this be my problem?
--
Rgds
Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
On Tuesday 07 April 2015 22:24:38 Peter Humphrey wrote: $ cat make.conf # I made a local copy and removed a lot of comments #CFLAGS=-O2 -march=core2 -pipe [1] ---8 [1] This bothers me. Various docs tell me to specify march=core17, but this is an i5 CPU. Could this be my problem? s/17/i7/ -- Rgds Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
On Tuesday 07 Apr 2015 22:48:54 Peter Humphrey wrote: On Tuesday 07 April 2015 22:24:38 Peter Humphrey wrote: $ cat make.conf # I made a local copy and removed a lot of comments #CFLAGS=-O2 -march=core2 -pipe [1] ---8 [1] This bothers me. Various docs tell me to specify march=core17, but this is an i5 CPU. Could this be my problem? s/17/i7/ I doubt it, but is there any reason you do not use: -march=native instead of core2 or i7 ? -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
On Sunday 05 April 2015 21:05:15 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 19:03:43 schrieb Peter Humphrey: On Sunday 05 April 2015 18:29:05 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Do you see anything that is actually broken? Apart from perl-cleaner and portage? Emerge exiting silently after being given a list of packages to emerge doesn't exactly seem like normal behaviour to me. It was told emerge -v1 ...[list of packages] as in perl- cleaner's usual behaviour. No ifs, no buts - just do it. Very strange. Portage does to my best knowledge not use perl and not even depend on it. After a bit more thought I remember that GCC was upgraded last week, and the change log referred to many bug fixes. (That's what my memory tells me, anyway, but I can't see where I found it now.) So I decided to emerge -e world, which I did in two passes: first emerge -eB world, then boot to a minimal system and emerge -eK world. Then etc-update and reboot, compile the kernel again (gentoo-sources-3.18.9) and a final reboot. Maybe something went wrong in the middle of that, so I've set off the same process again. It'll take a few hours, so I'm off to bed again meanwhile - it's 04:30 here. -- Rgds Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
On Sunday 05 April 2015 12:24:20 Mick wrote: ---8 and then portage proceeds in emerging them. So something must not be right with your circumstances, but I am not sure what ... It has me scratching my head too. Thanks for the report. -- Rgds Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
On Sunday 05 Apr 2015 10:50:53 Peter Humphrey wrote: Hello list, Today's routine update included dev-lang/perl-5.20.2 and two perl virtuals. Since emerging those portage has stopped working: perl-cleaner gives it a list of 71 packages to emerge but portage does nothing with them - it just exits silently. Then perl-cleaner lists some hundreds of files that it can't do anything with. What's going on here? I've restored from last week's backup and added the offending perl packages to package.mask, but is that the right thing to do? This sounds odd. I emerged virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.64.0 yesterday, but haven't sync'ed today. perl-cleaner gives me this: = # perl-cleaner --reallyall * Removing perl-core packages from world file *emerge --deselect perl-core/Data-Dumper perl-core/File-Temp perl- core/Module-Build perl-core/libnet No matching atoms found in world favorites file... * Updating installed Perl virtuals *emerge -u1 virtual/perl-Archive-Tar virtual/perl-CPAN-Meta virtual/perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 virtual/perl- Compress-Raw-Zlib virtual/perl-Data-Dumper virtual/perl-Digest-MD5 virtual/perl-Digest-SHA virtual/perl-Encode virtual/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder virtual/perl-ExtUtils-Install virtual/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker virtual/perl- ExtUtils-Manifest virtual/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS virtual/perl-File-Spec virtual/perl-File-Temp virtual/perl-Getopt-Long virtual/perl-IO virtual/perl- IO-Compress virtual/perl-JSON-PP virtual/perl-MIME-Base64 virtual/perl-Module- Build virtual/perl-Module-Metadata virtual/perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta virtual/perl- Perl-OSType virtual/perl-Scalar-List-Utils virtual/perl-Storable virtual/perl- Test-Harness virtual/perl-Test-Simple virtual/perl-Text-ParseWords virtual/perl-Time-Local virtual/perl-libnet virtual/perl-version Calculating dependencies... done! Auto-cleaning packages... No outdated packages were found on your system. * Beginning a clean up of .ph files * Excluding files for 0.0.0 and 0.0.0/x86_64-linux from cleaning * Locating ph files for removal * Updating ph files. * Ignore all No such file... messages! Can't open machine/ansi.h: No such file or directory Can't open sys/_types.h: No such file or directory Can't open gnu/stubs-x32.h: No such file or directory Can't open gnu/stubs-x32.h: No such file or directory Can't open gnu/stubs-x32.h: No such file or directory Can't open gnu/stubs-x32.h: No such file or directory * Locating packages for an update * Locating ebuilds linked against libperl * Adding to list: perl-core/libnet:0 * virtual/perl-libnet:0 * Adding to list: perl-core/File-Temp:0 * virtual/perl-File-Temp:0 * Adding to list: perl-core/Data-Dumper:0 * virtual/perl-Data-Dumper:0 * Adding to list: perl-core/Module-Build:0 * virtual/perl-Module-Build:0 * Adding to list: x11-terms/rxvt-unicode:0 * Adding to list: dev-vcs/git:0 * Adding to list: net-irc/irssi:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/HTML-Parser:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/File-BaseDir:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/IO-Socket-SSL:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/XML-LibXML:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/File-Listing:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/Encode-Locale:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/File-MimeInfo:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/XML-SAX:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/DateManip:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/HTTP-Negotiate:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/XML-SAX-Base:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/WWW-RobotRules:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/Archive-Zip:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/Locale-gettext:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/File-DesktopEntry:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/URI:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/libwww-perl:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/HTTP-Daemon:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/Net-HTTP:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/Error:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/XML-Parser:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/Net-SMTP-SSL:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/Authen-SASL:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/LWP-Protocol-https:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/XML-NamespaceSupport:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/HTML-Tagset:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/LWP-MediaTypes:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/Net-SSLeay:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/Digest-HMAC:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/HTTP-Message:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/JSON:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/XML-Simple:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/HTTP-Cookies:0 * Adding to list: dev-perl/HTTP-Date:0 * Adding to list: media-libs/exiftool:0 * emerge -v1 --backtrack=100 perl-core/libnet:0 virtual/perl-libnet:0 perl- core/File-Temp:0 virtual/perl-File-Temp:0 perl-core/Data-Dumper:0 virtual/perl-Data-Dumper:0 perl-core/Module-Build:0 virtual/perl-Module- Build:0 x11-terms/rxvt-unicode:0 dev-vcs/git:0 net-irc/irssi:0 dev-perl/HTML- Parser:0 dev-perl/File-BaseDir:0 dev-perl/IO-Socket-SSL:0 dev-perl/XML-
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
On 05/04/2015 11:50, Peter Humphrey wrote: Hello list, Today's routine update included dev-lang/perl-5.20.2 and two perl virtuals. Since emerging those portage has stopped working: perl-cleaner gives it a list of 71 packages to emerge but portage does nothing with them - it just exits silently. Then perl-cleaner lists some hundreds of files that it can't do anything with. What's going on here? I've restored from last week's backup and added the offending perl packages to package.mask, but is that the right thing to do? When I occasionally run into bizarre weirdness like this, I usually wait one hor, re-sync and try again. If it still fails, then go looking further. Significant updates to the CVS tree are not atomic and every now and then you can do a sync while a dev is making his own updates. Especially in the light that it all works fine for Mick. If you use a third party tree mirror, you can also update against the master at rsync.gentoo.org to get the very latest tree. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
[gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
Hello list, Today's routine update included dev-lang/perl-5.20.2 and two perl virtuals. Since emerging those portage has stopped working: perl-cleaner gives it a list of 71 packages to emerge but portage does nothing with them - it just exits silently. Then perl-cleaner lists some hundreds of files that it can't do anything with. What's going on here? I've restored from last week's backup and added the offending perl packages to package.mask, but is that the right thing to do? -- Rgds Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 11:50:53 schrieb Peter Humphrey: Hello list, Today's routine update included dev-lang/perl-5.20.2 and two perl virtuals. Since emerging those portage has stopped working: perl-cleaner gives it a list of 71 packages to emerge but portage does nothing with them - it just exits silently. Then perl-cleaner lists some hundreds of files that it can't do anything with. Do you see anything that is actually broken? Minor updates (5.x.y - 5.x.y+1) do not need any rebuilds or reinstallations of modules. Not 100% sure what perl-cleaner does when you run it anyway. Maybe it reinstalls all, but it's not necessary. [Side note, your information on what perl-cleaner does is very vague, I can't distll anything useful out of it.] - -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVIWLRXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0RkJDMzI0NjNBOTIwMDY5MTQ2NkMzNDBF MTM4NkZEN0VGNEI1Nzc5AAoJEOE4b9fvS1d5G8kP/RZuTdZbi+lB8Ts4khQcVMKr 7snXkSV+yfV5tWnMu9loJI9HEq3T3kr9WKdsR+YCcNlozT20n6h7kDfmOwbRem9V QZCOKsMLh4ITlJ6c1cGOe7g1TAuMc2othQn3y0OgymDAWGELhYrs5JynDcAWWZxY kJSHbu7RRBmaxklIkRD5BevFDSwCgXvFK1qGjEtU1NRqJ3vHlKU7WcLclYKVCVqQ qzsgQkwxthjCTCQfPx0ffCBxarKkp1DdENNpPpuRnHhrlf0GxNnea4iVcrqMaMdL Hepc1fpro2z/mc3VcmneP+Oe9vXKDzIVMYd3Q3d6jjsL2dPLjDHMDeguCIUgtnVj yoHAYQAiaFphtgQmo4aKKO5le4dyBO9aDf5PcYPAIQ0KgUH9rFPfDeCtJb2ztjcD gxiLAQaDvmgLYGo6wi7tjifHh7Kgo0qIF1sQNsPWxAk0dy/zAX3V6BXFAeh5UmCZ PPN78GbvlsVvKW2kHIZf4D6qYROiR3ncDwOiw+LGVkiMeO7dui7UtKXo1Czv09Fr bLn4ORVjARyF/cfr5CD6pe+p8iEUbLogcKnaHnGcaOiI+S0D5ihxFoKXpSqe8GpI aSExy1rVqmOSd+rXwdznM5ZgHOSXFZGaYfRj2IwzWsxst0wJScP49ZU7q4Q0lWTB O4JIj+FE1mpY0m4p9GVk =AGGJ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
On Sunday 05 April 2015 13:44:25 Alan McKinnon wrote: When I occasionally run into bizarre weirdness like this, I usually wait one hour, re-sync and try again. If it still fails, then go looking further. Significant updates to the CVS tree are not atomic and every now and then you can do a sync while a dev is making his own updates. Especially in the light that it all works fine for Mick. Nope. Didn't help. I re-synced 11 hours later but got the same result. -- Rgds Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
On Sunday 05 April 2015 18:29:05 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Do you see anything that is actually broken? Apart from perl-cleaner and portage? Emerge exiting silently after being given a list of packages to emerge doesn't exactly seem like normal behaviour to me. It was told emerge -v1 ...[list of packages] as in perl- cleaner's usual behaviour. No ifs, no buts - just do it. Minor updates (5.x.y - 5.x.y+1) do not need any rebuilds or reinstallations of modules. Not 100% sure what perl-cleaner does when you run it anyway. Maybe it reinstalls all, but it's not necessary. I just ran it to see what it'd do. I got more than I'd bargained for. [Side note, your information on what perl-cleaner does is very vague, I can't distll anything useful out of it.] The two virtuals were perl-File-Spec-3.480.100 and perl-Storable-2.490.100. I hope you don't want me to list the hundreds of files it can't handle. -- Rgds Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Is perl broken?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 19:03:43 schrieb Peter Humphrey: On Sunday 05 April 2015 18:29:05 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Do you see anything that is actually broken? Apart from perl-cleaner and portage? Emerge exiting silently after being given a list of packages to emerge doesn't exactly seem like normal behaviour to me. It was told emerge -v1 ...[list of packages] as in perl- cleaner's usual behaviour. No ifs, no buts - just do it. Very strange. Portage does to my best knowledge not use perl and not even depend on it. - -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVIYdxXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0RkJDMzI0NjNBOTIwMDY5MTQ2NkMzNDBF MTM4NkZEN0VGNEI1Nzc5AAoJEOE4b9fvS1d5SaQP/0/l39fTkrn7tLGu7Z2OYub9 q8OCBQQg6Vhde6A5d8gZf0OsWpP2FpNmdHudAXGXJdfntiCEUWiZ+BA2yBGQLxP1 gifiToD8ACOUEiN9KZzI5o+0yr12//AE1le5QHgBEA0cPOor6vsuLPxeeT9DB806 crB2WB7cHS+Tg/Szan5Px/sm4AUNitgRsHfJH19MLP9cK5Y/8SEfcv8c4qeBVwIN UPKI6Gp9NdvQAOLNMFWbO2Hr727l49VzayqAUktZF6lwIWrOnc1SBWJTkwwgteTM wfopfk82z2llaAqfrYPmfLxjLgXjyXBjmsXngXR8fHjQWFWPF+ww1JuRLTojXjXW kB9RUvg3a8tY25uwfFmtnaRMll0DgA7piJKjgUnj/oxqvu9zGdHULZZHFwW94lDu xB5SId0QYsHOAXdd3xJ13slODGlZxrgUUcrDyW97mwUwFN79g5O0uxt/TuiDCu5o lr8TGqJ1NohLDFH8k7t9B5vBO16sgWa713HayR7kEif6gOOoxyNBfx/blJkcOBC2 aXmABGany+jaPVmTHir/Y9pa2UgpyitYp/Qei+nCrekuM1ifMVtm572AArVK/pf2 vM+Flg13lxqLk1jGC5glfDUTwmQB42QYhTdltMDOxRDNwHwwFQjw2f25+vyB0OqZ a3WfNAnqplT6rRLqsA7v =WYbK -END PGP SIGNATURE-
