Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2 and 3.5

2009-02-01 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:41:35 -0600, Dale wrote: > >> emerge -C kde > >> emerge --depclean -a > >> emerge -av kde-meta > >> > > > > That's what I was afraid of. Sigh. Thanks. > > > > > > > > Could he just emerge -C kde then re-emerge whatever he wanted without > having to reinstall a

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2 and 3.5

2009-02-01 Thread Dale
Daniel D Jones wrote: > On Sunday 01 February 2009 17:49:03 Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:07:37 +, Daniel D Jones wrote: >> >>> 3.5.10 is available under the meta package system but not under the KDE >>> package. Do I have to switch to the meta package to go to 3.5.10

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2 and 3.5

2009-02-01 Thread Daniel D Jones
On Sunday 01 February 2009 17:49:03 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:07:37 +, Daniel D Jones wrote: > > 3.5.10 is available under the meta package system but not under the KDE > > package. Do I have to switch to the meta package to go to 3.5.10? > > (Without, that is, manually unbl

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2 and 3.5

2009-02-01 Thread Norberto Bensa
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Daniel D Jones wrote: > Uh, someone's confused here. It may very well be me but I'm not following you > at all. The other post concerned startkde blocking kdelibs. Yes. I'm sorry. You're using monolithic KDE. I don't remember if startkde was part of kdebase. Mayb

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2 and 3.5

2009-02-01 Thread Daniel D Jones
On Sunday 01 February 2009 17:17:59 Norberto Bensa wrote: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel D Jones wrote: > > On Sunday 01 February 2009 15:40:29 Norberto Bensa wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Daniel D Jones > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > I have KDE 3.5 and 4.1 installed and am t

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2 and 3.5

2009-02-01 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:07:37 +, Daniel D Jones wrote: > 3.5.10 is available under the meta package system but not under the KDE > package. Do I have to switch to the meta package to go to 3.5.10? > (Without, that is, manually unblocking lots and lots of packages.) Can > I simply install the

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2 and 3.5

2009-02-01 Thread Norberto Bensa
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel D Jones wrote: > On Sunday 01 February 2009 15:40:29 Norberto Bensa wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Daniel D Jones > wrote: >> > I have KDE 3.5 and 4.1 installed and am trying to upgrade to 4.2. I'm >> > getting the following: >> >> You'll need kd

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2 and 3.5

2009-02-01 Thread Daniel D Jones
On Sunday 01 February 2009 15:40:29 Norberto Bensa wrote: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Daniel D Jones wrote: > > I have KDE 3.5 and 4.1 installed and am trying to upgrade to 4.2. I'm > > getting the following: > > You'll need kde-3.5.10 (or kdebase-startkde at least) > > Look in the archive

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2 and 3.5

2009-02-01 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:38:03 +, Daniel D Jones wrote: > As a second question, can anyone point me to an informative reference > on ~arch? http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3&chap=3 -- Neil Bothwick Law of Mechanical Repair: After your hands become coated with gre

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.2 and 3.5

2009-02-01 Thread Norberto Bensa
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Daniel D Jones wrote: > I have KDE 3.5 and 4.1 installed and am trying to upgrade to 4.2. I'm getting > the following: > You'll need kde-3.5.10 (or kdebase-startkde at least) Look in the archives, a similar question was posted a few days ago.

[gentoo-user] KDE 4.2 and 3.5

2009-02-01 Thread Daniel D Jones
I have KDE 3.5 and 4.1 installed and am trying to upgrade to 4.2. I'm getting the following: <=kde-base/kdebase-3.5.9-r4 ("<=kde-base/kdebase-3.5.9-r4" is blocking kde-base/kdelibs-4.2.0) Is there an issue with 3.5 and 4.2 being installed together? Is the above block a known issue that's bei